대리인 비용과 권력의 결합 = 기업소유구조가 경영진의 보상 수준에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구에서 저자는 주식 소유에 기반을 둔 권력이 경영진의 보상 수준에 미치는 영향을 분석했다. 우리나라 증권거래소 에 상장된 기업 158개를 대상으로 하여 실증 분석한 결과, 기업의 성과와 규모, 그리고 최고 경영자의 지분율은 경영진 의 보상 수준에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 최고경영자 및 기관투자가 지분율은 기업 성과가 경영진 의 보상에 미치는 영향을 負的으로 조절하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 말미에는 이러한 연구 결과가 함의하는 바와 미 래 연구의 방향에 대한 토론이 이어진다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Adams, "＂Toward an understandingof inequity ” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology" 341-351, 1963

2 박헌준, "한국기업의 대리인 비용과 기업가치: 외국인 지분의 역할" 33 (33): 655-682, 2004

3 한국경제신문사, "한경비즈니스 6" 서울: 한국경제신문출판사 2004

4 김경묵, "직급 간 임금 격차(Pay Dispersion) 결정 요인에 관한 연구: 토너먼트 이론(TournamentTheory)의 검증" 29 (29): 177-218, 2005

5 지청, "소유구조와 기업 가치의 상호관계에 관한 실증적 분석" 2001

6 김경묵, "기업 지배구조와 혁신: 소유구조가 연구개발(R&D) 투자에 미치는 영향" 32 (32): 1799-1832, 2003

7 이경묵, "경영진 구성에 대한 정부 규제:사외이사제도의 형성 과정에 대한 고찰" 24 (24): 317-348, 2001

8 신현한, "경영자보상구조에 관한 실증연구" 경영연구소 40 (40): 47-72, 2003

9 Smith, "”Journal of Financial Economics" 262-292, 1992

10 Fama, "” Journal of Lawand Economics" “separatio (“separatio): 301-325, 1983

11 Murphy, "” Journal of Accounting and Economics" 11-42, 1985

12 Eisenhardt, "” Academy of Management Review" 57-74, 1989

13 Balkin, "“Toward a contingency theory of compensationstrategy" 169-182, 1987

14 Becker, "“Theincentive effects of tournament compensationsystems" 336-350, 1992

15 Hambrick, "“Theeffects of ownership structure on conditionsat the top The case of CEO pay raises" 175-193, 1995

16 Tosi, "“Thedecoupling of CEO pay and performance" 169-189, 1989

17 Zajac, "“Thecosts and benefits of managerial incentivesand monitoring in large US corporations" 121-142, 1994

18 Lambert, "“The structure of organizational incentives" 438-461, 1993

19 Bethel, "“The effectsof ownership structure on corporate restructuring" 15-31, 1993

20 Baysinger, "“The composition of boards of directors andstrategic control Effects on corporatestrategy ” Academy of Management Review" 72-87, 1990

21 Lev, "“Risk reduction asa managerial motive for conglomeratemergers ” Bell Journal of Economics" 605-616, 1981

22 A, "“Managerial incentives and investmentin R&D in multiproduct firms" 325-341, 1993

23 Hambrick, "“Fragmentation and the otherproblems CEOs have with their topmanagement teams" 110-127, 1995

24 Finkelstein, "“Effectsof strategic orientation and environmentalchange on senior management rewardsystems" 127-142, 1992

25 Pfeffer, "“Effects ofownership and performance on executivetenure in U" 653-664, 1980

26 Gibbs, "“Determinants of corporaterestructuring" 51-68, 1993

27 Kroll, "“Determinant of chief executive officercompensation following major acquisitions ”Journal of Business Research" 349-366, 1990

28 O’Reilly, "“CEO compensation as tournament and socialcomparison A tale of two theories" 257-274, 1988

29 Fama, "“Agency problems and the theory of the firm ” Journal of Political Economy" 288-307, 1980

30 Coff, R, "wars over R&D-intensivefirms: Knowledge, opportunism, and themarket for corporate control" 46 (46): 74-85, 2003

31 Carpenter, M. A, "team compensation: Themissing link between CEO pay and firmperformance?" 23 : 367-375, 2002

32 Hayward, M, "premiums paid for large acquisitions:Evidence of CEO hubris" 42 : 103-127, 1997

33 Tosi., H. L, "much does performancematter? A meta-analysis of CEO paystudies" 26 : 301-339, 2000

34 Kidder, D, "excessbring success? CEO compensation and thepsychological contract" 12 : 599-617, 2002

35 David, P, "effect of institutional investors on thelevel and mix of CEO compensation" 41 (41): 200-208, 1998

36 Miozzo, M, "competitiveadvantage: innovation and corporategovernance in European construction" 31 : 989-1008, 2002

37 Fatemi, A, "Wealth creation and managerial pay:MVA and EVA as determinants of executivecompensation" 69 : 1-21, 2003

38 Finkelstein, S, "TopExecutives and Their Effects on Organizations" Minneapolis St.Paul, West 1996

39 Carpenter, M. A, "Top management teams, global strategicposture, and the moderating role ofuncertainty" 44 (44): 533-545, 2001

40 Henderson, A, "Top management team coordination needs and the CEO pay gap: A competitive test ofeconomic and behavior views" 4 : 96-117, 2001

41 Wright, P, "The structure of ownership andcorporate acquisition strategies" 23 : 41-53, 2002

42 Geletkanycz, M. A, "The strategic value of CEOexternal directorate networks: Implicationsfor CEO compensation" 22 : 889-898, 2001

43 David, P, "The influence of activism by institutionalinvestors on R&D" 44 : 144-157, 2001

44 Carpenter, M. A, "The implications ofstrategy and social context for the relationshipbetween top management teamheterogeneity and firm performance" 23 : 275-284, 2002

45 Miller, J, "The fit between CEO compensationdesign and firm risk" 45 (45): 745-756, 2002

46 Eisenmann, T. R, "The effects of CEOequity ownership and firm diversificationon risk taking" 23 : 513-534, 2002

47 Aguilera, R. V, "The crossnationaldiversity of corporate governance:Dimensions and determinants" 28 (28): 447-465, 2003

48 Salancik, G. R, "The basesand use of power in organizational decisionmaking" London, Sage Vol.Ⅴ : 20-42, 2002

49 Boyd, B. K, "Strategicreward systems: A contingency model ofpay system design" 22 : 777-792, 2001

50 Gomez-Mejia, L. R, "Reframing executive compensation" 23 (23): 291-374, 1997

51 Reisen, H, "Prospects for emerging-marketflows amid investor concerns about corporategovernance, Corporate Governanceand Capital Flows in a Global Economy" New York, Oxford University Press 161-182, 2003

52 Lee, P. M, "Ownershipstructures and R&D investments of U.S.and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardshipperspectives" 13 (13): 95-112, 2003

53 Durand, R, "Ownership,organization, and private firms’ efficientuse of resources" 24 (24): 667-675, 2003

54 Gedajalovic, E. R, "Ownership structure and firm profitabilityin Japan" 45 : 565-576, 2002

55 Rapport, A, "New thinking on how to linkexecutive pay with performance, HarvardBusiness Review on Compensation" BostonMA., Harvard Business School Press 1-28, 2001

56 Combs, J. G, "Managerialistand human capital explanations for keyexecutive pay premiums: A contingency perspective" 46 (46): 63-73, 2003

57 Barkema, H. R, "Managerial compensation and firm performance:A general research framework" 41 (41): 135-145, 1998

58 "Journal of Financial Economics" 163-38 184, 1995

59 Useem, M. A, "Investor capitalism: Howmoney managers are changing the faceof corporate America" New York, Basic Books 1996

60 Sanders, W. G, "Internationalization and firm governance:The role of CEO compensation, top teamcomposition and board structure" 41 : 158-178, 1998

61 Acemoglu, D, "Institutions,corporate governance, and crisis, Corporate Governance and Capital flows ina Global Economy" New York, Oxford University Press 327-347, 2003

62 Kochhar, R, "Institutionalinvestors and firm innovation: A test ofcompeting hypotheses" 17 (17): 73-84, 1996

63 Henderson, A, "Informationprocessing demands as a determinantof CEO compensation" 39 : 575-606, 1996

64 Finkelstein, S, "How muchdoes the CEO matter? The role of Managerialdiscretion in the setting of CEO compensation" 41 (41): 179-199, 1998

65 Kroll, M, "Form of control: A critical determinantof acquisition performance and CEOrewards" 18 (18): 85-96, 1997

66 George, R, "Foreignand domestic ownership, business groupsand firm performance: An emerging marketperspective, Academy ofManagement Seattle" 2003

67 Cornelius, P. K, "Foreign bank ownershipand corporate governance in emerging-marketeconomics, Corporate Governance andCapital Flows in a Global Economy" NewYork, Oxford University Press 241-266, 2003

68 “Determinantsof top management compensation, "Explaining the impact of economic and strategic constructs and the moderationeffects of industry ” Journal of Management" 515-538, 1990

69 Kochhar, R, "Explaining firm capitalstructure: The role of agency theory vs.transaction cost economics" 17 (17): 713-728, 1996

70 Kassinis, G, "Corporateboards and outside stakeholders as determinantsof environmental litigation" 23 : 399-415, 2002

71 Mobius, M, "Corporate governance: Responsibilitiesof fund managers and institutionalinvestors, Corporate Governance andCapital flows in a Global Economy" NewYork, Oxford University Press 401-412, 2003

72 Core, J. E, "Corporate governance, chief executiveofficer compensation, and firm performance" 51 : 371-406, 1999

73 Heneman Ⅲ, H. G, "Compensation researchdirections and suggestions for the newmillennium" 12 : 75-80, 2002

74 Milkovich, G. T, "Compensation" Boston, McGraw-Hill 2004

75 Westphal, J. D, "Collaboration in theboardroom: Behavior and performance consequencesof CEO-board social ties" 42 (42): 7-24, 1999

76 Jayaraman, N, "CEO founder status and firmfinancial performance" 21 : 1215-1224, 2000

77 Conyon, M. J, "Board control,remuneration committees, and top managementcompensation" 41 (41): 146-157, 1998

78 Sanders, W. G, "Behavioral Responses ofCEOs to stock ownership and stock optionpay" 44 (44): 477-492, 2001

79 Bougon, M, "Ananalysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra" Fundamentals of OrganizationalBehavior, London, Sage 101-137, 2002

80 Denis, D. D, "Agency Problems, equity ownership andcorporate diversification" 52 (52): 135-160, 1998

81 Finkelstein, "A study of theintersection of markets and political processes" 121-134, 1989

82 Beatty, "A study of executive compensation and board structure in initial publicofferings" “Managerialincentives 313-335, 1994

83 Hadlock, C. J, ",turnover, and top management incentives: Historical evidence" 70 (70): 153-187, 1997