간접정범과 정범우위성에 관한 연구 = A Study of Indirect Principal and Precedence of Principal

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Where more than one person are involved in the same crime, the Korean Criminal Act classifies them as a principal and an accomplice. A principal is a person who directly commits a criminal act, and an accomplice is a person who assists in the commission of a crime. In general, a principal includes not only a person that actually commits the crime but also a person that materializes his criminal intent by ruling the intent of another actor without directly performing the criminal act (Rule by Intent). The former is defined as direct principal, and the latter, as indirect principal. An accomplice is a person who is involved in the crime on the premise of the existence of a principal. Thus, a principal is an actor who is primarily responsible for the commitment of a criminal act, and an accomplice is a person who is secondarily responsible for that. Then, when more than one person are involved in a crime, a principal should be identified first, and only then can an accomplice be held responsible for the crime (Predominance of a Principal). In other words, who caused the criminal consequence should be first identified and then a person involved in the principal's act should be held responsible for the crime.
However, Paragraph 1 of Article 34 of the Korean Criminal Act defines an indirect principal as "a person who is not punishable" or "a person who is punishable as an offender through negligence" regardless of Rule by Intent. This produces the result far from the principle of Predominance of a Principal. This is attributed to the lack of sufficient review of the principle that an accomplice shall be punished subject to the punishment of a principle.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 간접정범의 본질과 행위책임 동시존재의 원칙
• Ⅲ. 간접정범의 성립과 정범우위성의 원칙
• Ⅳ. 맺으며(공범종속성의 새로운 이해를 통한 해결)
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이영란, "형법학총론강의" 형설출판사 2008

2 이건호, "형법학개론" 고대출판부 1964

3 성낙현, "형법총론" 동방문화사 2010

4 안동준, "형법총론" 학현사 1998

5 오영근, "형법총론" 박영사 2009

6 배종대, "형법총론" 홍문사 545-, 2009

7 권오걸, "형법총론" 형설출판사 2009

8 김성천, "형법총론" 소진출판사 2014

9 정성근, "형법총론" 삼지원 2008

10 신동운, "형법총론" 법문사 2006

11 진계호, "형법총론" 대왕출판사 2007

12 조준현, "형법총론" 법원사 2004

13 임웅, "형법총론" 법문사 2014

14 이재상, "형법총론" 박영사 2013

15 정영일, "형법강의(총론)" 학림출판사 2013

16 정성근, "법철학과 형법의 제문제" 1989

17 오정용, "공범성립에 있어서 위법의 연대성에 대한 비판적 고찰" 부설법학연구소 34 : 325-350, 2011

18 이보영, "간접정범의 정범성과 성립 범위 - 형법 개정안과 관련하여 -" 한국법학회 (31) : 335-360, 2008

19 김종구, "간접정범의 미수에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 (36) : 217-237, 2009

20 최우찬, "간접정범과 교사범의 관계" 2 : 81-, 2000

21 김일수, "(새로쓴)형법총론" 박영사 2007