RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Thematic Organization of Discourse and Referential Choices in Australian Languages

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76196745

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Thematic Organization of Discourse and Referential Choices in Australian Languages. Discourse and Cognition 8.2,. 1-21. The present paper aims to investigate how the speakers use the referential choices available in discourse in Australian Aboriginal languages. Three narrative texts from Mayali and Kala Lagaw Ya are examined by employing three different approaches: ⅰ) linear topic continuity measurements, ⅱ) thematicity of the participants, and ⅲ) discourse structure. The results show that the two languages utilize different sets of referring expressions, and that even the comparable forms do not have the same functions in discourse. In Mayali, pronouns are found to be globally-motivated, referring to the most salient characters at episode boundaries whereas demonstratives are more locally-motivated, referring to minor characters or major props marking contrast or emphasis. On the other hand, in Kala Lagaw Ya, pronouns are used as a regular referentical device marking continuous participants whereas demonstratives are used, among other things, to refer back to important props of the story.
    번역하기

    Thematic Organization of Discourse and Referential Choices in Australian Languages. Discourse and Cognition 8.2,. 1-21. The present paper aims to investigate how the speakers use the referential choices available in discourse in Australian Aboriginal ...

    Thematic Organization of Discourse and Referential Choices in Australian Languages. Discourse and Cognition 8.2,. 1-21. The present paper aims to investigate how the speakers use the referential choices available in discourse in Australian Aboriginal languages. Three narrative texts from Mayali and Kala Lagaw Ya are examined by employing three different approaches: ⅰ) linear topic continuity measurements, ⅱ) thematicity of the participants, and ⅲ) discourse structure. The results show that the two languages utilize different sets of referring expressions, and that even the comparable forms do not have the same functions in discourse. In Mayali, pronouns are found to be globally-motivated, referring to the most salient characters at episode boundaries whereas demonstratives are more locally-motivated, referring to minor characters or major props marking contrast or emphasis. On the other hand, in Kala Lagaw Ya, pronouns are used as a regular referentical device marking continuous participants whereas demonstratives are used, among other things, to refer back to important props of the story.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. General Descriptions of the Data
    • 3. Methodology
    • 4. Results
    • 5. Conclusion
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. General Descriptions of the Data
    • 3. Methodology
    • 4. Results
    • 5. Conclusion
    • References
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼