수업목적 복제보상금제도의 문제점 = Problems with the Remuneration System for the purpose of Teaching

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Korean Copyright Act provides three kinds of remuneration systems: one for limitation and exception of copyright, another one for neighboring right holders and the third one for statutory license. Among them, the remuneration system for limitation and exception of copyright exists for the purpose of adjusting between right holder`s economic benefits and the excessive use of a work in the scope where in principle the work may be used for free but the economic benefits of right holders may be prejudiced with excessive use. From the viewpoint of international treaty, 3 step test may be the standard of the remuneration system for limitation and exception of copyrights. It is doubtful that the use of copyrighted works for the purpose of teaching which is subject to remuneration at issue would go beyond 3 step test at Korean universities where coursepacks as supplementary material are scarcely used in comparison with Anglo-American countries. Also, Korean Copyright Act provides the provisions of ``Quotations from Works Made Public`` (Art.28) and ``Fair Use of Works``(Art.35ter) which allow works to be used for the purpose of education without permission and for free. However the Korea Reproduction and Transmission Rights Association forces every university to pay remuneration for the use of works for the purpose of teaching. Besides, even if there are two ways to pay remuneration for: blanket license and individual license, only blanket license, which is in the form of a levy, is expected to be enforced. The levy system has difficulty in finding how works are used, whereupon the collected remuneration is hard to be fairly distributed. Accordingly, this article examines how other countries operate the remuneration system for the purpose of teaching at the universities and it will take account into the problems with the remuneration system under Korean Copyright Act and the improvement plan.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박경화, "캐나다 대학 연합, 대학 개강 시기에 맞춰 공정이용 가이드라인 발표" 한국저작권위원회 (19) : 2013

2 김경숙, "저작권법상 보상금제도의 유형과 특징" 한국저작권위원회 25 (25): 157-194, 2012

3 박성호, "저작권법 제25조 소정의 법정허락과 미분배 보상금 문제" (471) : 2013

4 이해완, "저작권 집중관리제도의 현황과 발전방향" 한국정보법학회 8 (8): 2004

5 김경숙, "일본의 사적녹음녹화보상금제도의현황 및 시사점" 비교법학연구소 40 : 93-128, 2013

6 박익환, "원격교육과 저작권법 : 최근 미국법 개정을 중심으로" 저작권심의조정위원회 2003

7 문화체육관광부, "수업목적 저작물이용 보상기준에 관한 연구보고서" 2009

8 대한출판문화협회, "수업목적 저작물 이용 보상금제도 이렇게 만들어졌다" 47 (47): 2010

9 문화체육관광부, "수업목적 이용저작물 보상금 공청회 자료"

10 최승재, "미분배 보상금의 활용에 대한 연구-미국제도를 포함하여-" 2013

11 조승현, "미국의 원격교육제도에 관한 연구 : 법학분야를 중심으로" 한국방송통신대학교 51 : 2011

12 윤태영, "교육현장에서의 저작물 인용기준에 관한 연구" 한국교육학술정보원 2009

13 이상정, "교과용도서 저작권보상금 지급관련 업무개선 연구" 한국교과서연구재단 2003

14 김경숙, "공정이용과 3단계테스트" 세창출판사 (69) : 2012

15 문화관광부, "개정저작권법해설"

16 최진원, "각국의 교육기관에서의 저작물 이용 제도 비교" 한국복사전송권협회 2010

17 加戸守行, "著作権法逐条講義" 著作権情報センター 2006

18 Universities Australia, "Response to the ALRC Issues Paper: Copyright and the Digital Economy"

19 Ann Bartow, "Educational Fair Use in Copyright: Reclaiming the Right To Photocopy Freely" 60 : 149-, 1999

20 Australian Copyright Council, "Education: Copyright Basics"

21 Jonathan Band, "EDUCATIONAL FAIR USE TODAY"

22 Australian Law Reform Commission, "Copyright and the Digital Economy" 2012