사실적 이해 능력 평가를 위한 한국어능력시험 읽기 문항의 환언 적절성 연구 = A Study on the Adequacy of Paraphrasing Test of Proficiency in Korean(TOPIK) Reading Questions in Testing Literal Comprehension Ability

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this research is to set appropriate standards for paraphrasing when writing multiple-choice reading questions for testing literal comprehension ability and to make suggestions for appropriate paraphrasing based on the results obtained through test-item analysis. Three main criteria were set for evaluating the level of adequacy in paraphrasing, which includes the adequacy of the paraphrased unit, the consistency of meaning between the original and the paraphrased texts, and the linguistic level of paraphrased text. The unit of the paraphrasing should be done at the syntactic level rather than at the lexical level, and the meanings of the original and the paraphrased texts must exactly match. In addition, the language level of the paraphrased text ought to be equal to or lower than that of the original text. Based on these criteria, the items measuring literal comprehension ability in the TOPIK(Test of Proficiency in Korean) were analysed.
First, observing the adequacy of the paraphrased unit, it was found that although paraphrasing was done mostly at the syntactic level, there were more lexical-level paraphrasing in the beginner level than the intermediate and advanced level.
Next, the results showed that there were more discrepancies of meaning in the intermediate and advanced level than the beginner level, and more cases of inconsistencies in syntactic-level paraphrasing than the lexical-level paraphrasing.
Lastly, it revealed that the ratio of the linguistic level of the paraphrased text being higher than that of the original text were somewhat higher in the beginner level than the intermediate and advanced level.
Thus, when creating multiple-choice items for assessing literal comprehension ability, it is necessary to construct the questions based upon these criteria of the adequacy and to check the items against the criteria in the editing stage.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김의수, "환언관계 속담들의 통사구조 비교" 한국어교육학회 (123) : 405-436, 2007

2 이홍매, "한국어 환언문 연구" 한국어의미학회 40 : 219-248, 2013

3 조남호, "한국어 학습용 어휘 선정 결과 보고서" 국립국어원 2003

4 장은경, "한국어 학문 목적 쓰기 교육 방안 연구 : 참고 텍스트의 내용 통합과 재구성을 중심으로" 고려대학교 교육대학원 2009

5 강승혜, "한국어 평가론" 태학사 53-54, 2006

6 최숙기, "중등학생의 자료 통합적 글쓰기에 나타난 자료 글 차용하기 수행 양상 연구 - 인용과 환언을 중심으로-" 한국작문학회 (38) : 201-245, 2018

7 김중섭, "국제 통용 한국어 표준 교육과정 적용 연구" 국립국어원 453-467, 2017

8 "국립국제교육원"

9 이성연, "구약 '아가'의 환언과 대용형 연구" 한국국어교육학회 (67) : 229-247, 2004

10 Heaton J. B., "Writing English Language Tests : A practical guide for teachers of English as a second or foreign language" Longman 1975

11 Roig, M., "When college students' attempts at paraphrasing become instances of potential plagiarism" 84 (84): 73-982, 1999

12 Keck, C., "The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers" 15 : 261-278, 2006

13 Shi, L., "Textual borrowing in second-language writing" 21 : 171-200, 2004

14 Pearson P. D., "Teaching Reading Comprehension" Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1972

15 Campbell, "Second language writing; Research insights for the classroom" Cambridge University Press 1990