RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중력모형을 이용한 해상국립공원 탐방수요 추정 = The Estimation of the Visiting Demand for Marine National Parks using Gravity Model

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101850135

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Although the gravity model had been neglected by the tourism demand literature for decades, it re-emerged as a way for modeling tourism demand as the role of structural factors on tourism became more essential. Gravity models use the Newton``s universal law of gravitation in order to describe the patterns of international trade. The model considers that the bilateral flows between two countries are directly proportional to the countries``economic masses and inversely proportional to the distance between them. Gravity models fit well when it comes to explaining the international flows of trade, migration and foreign investment. Thus, since tourism can be considered as a special type of trade in services, the movement of international travellers and tourists can also be analysed through the gravity approach. In this study, we employed five gravity models for four marine national parks. The gravity models employ either gross regional domestic product or population, while the distance between major metropolitan cities and national parks are considered as independent variables. The gravity Equations have the form of regressing tourism demand on bilateral distance and two measures of region size. The panel data, which combined the time series and cross-sectional observation, are composed of 4 national parks and 15 years. The gravity model 1 regress visitors on distance between Hallyeo Marine National Park and Seoul and Gross Regional Domestic Product of Seoul for Hallyeo Marine National Park, on distance between Odongdo and Seoul and GRDP of Seoul for Odongdo, on distance between Tae-An Seashore National Park and Seoul and GRDP of Seoul for Tae-An Seashore National Park and on distance between Dadohae Marine National Park and Seoul and GRDP of Seoul for Dadohae Marine National Park. The gravity model 2 inputs Busan instead of Seoul for Hallyeo Marine National Park, Gwangju for Odongdo and Dadohae Marine National Park, and Daejeon for Tae-An Seashore National Park. The gravity model 3 and 4 use population instead of GRDP for measuring the region``s economic mass. The panel cointegrating vectors shows that the number of visitors have a negative relationship with distance, but shows a positive association with the population of metropolitan cities. GDP and the distance between two regions play a principal role in the gravity model. The panel analysis indicates that the population of the nearby metropolitan city and the distance between the national park and the nearest metropolitan should be employed. However, neither the GRDP of the nearby metropolitan city, nor the Seoul city, and nor the population of Seoul is appropriate for explaining the visiting demand for marine parks.
    번역하기

    Although the gravity model had been neglected by the tourism demand literature for decades, it re-emerged as a way for modeling tourism demand as the role of structural factors on tourism became more essential. Gravity models use the Newton``s univers...

    Although the gravity model had been neglected by the tourism demand literature for decades, it re-emerged as a way for modeling tourism demand as the role of structural factors on tourism became more essential. Gravity models use the Newton``s universal law of gravitation in order to describe the patterns of international trade. The model considers that the bilateral flows between two countries are directly proportional to the countries``economic masses and inversely proportional to the distance between them. Gravity models fit well when it comes to explaining the international flows of trade, migration and foreign investment. Thus, since tourism can be considered as a special type of trade in services, the movement of international travellers and tourists can also be analysed through the gravity approach. In this study, we employed five gravity models for four marine national parks. The gravity models employ either gross regional domestic product or population, while the distance between major metropolitan cities and national parks are considered as independent variables. The gravity Equations have the form of regressing tourism demand on bilateral distance and two measures of region size. The panel data, which combined the time series and cross-sectional observation, are composed of 4 national parks and 15 years. The gravity model 1 regress visitors on distance between Hallyeo Marine National Park and Seoul and Gross Regional Domestic Product of Seoul for Hallyeo Marine National Park, on distance between Odongdo and Seoul and GRDP of Seoul for Odongdo, on distance between Tae-An Seashore National Park and Seoul and GRDP of Seoul for Tae-An Seashore National Park and on distance between Dadohae Marine National Park and Seoul and GRDP of Seoul for Dadohae Marine National Park. The gravity model 2 inputs Busan instead of Seoul for Hallyeo Marine National Park, Gwangju for Odongdo and Dadohae Marine National Park, and Daejeon for Tae-An Seashore National Park. The gravity model 3 and 4 use population instead of GRDP for measuring the region``s economic mass. The panel cointegrating vectors shows that the number of visitors have a negative relationship with distance, but shows a positive association with the population of metropolitan cities. GDP and the distance between two regions play a principal role in the gravity model. The panel analysis indicates that the population of the nearby metropolitan city and the distance between the national park and the nearest metropolitan should be employed. However, neither the GRDP of the nearby metropolitan city, nor the Seoul city, and nor the population of Seoul is appropriate for explaining the visiting demand for marine parks.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "해양수산주요통계"

    2 강신겸, "커뮤니티 중심의 섬관광 개발" 경남발전연구원 24-34, 2012

    3 김상구, "중력모형을 이용한 우리나라 냉동 수산물의 교역형태 분석" 한국수산경영학회 43 (43): 19-34, 2012

    4 노래영, "섬⋅갯벌 올림픽축제 활성화 방안에 관한 연구-제1회 신안섬⋅갯벌 올림픽축제 결과를 중심으로" 한국도서(섬)학회 19 (19): 37-92, 2007

    5 이동신, "섬 연구의 특수성과 향후 발전방향 - 한국도서연구지의 발행과정과 관련하여-" 한국도서(섬)학회 22 (22): 1-24, 2010

    6 김재호, "섬 방문객의 관광동기가 관광 후 태도에 미치는 영향 연구 - 인천광역시 섬 지역을 중심으로 -" 관광경영학회 18 (18): 125-145, 2014

    7 한상겸, "섬 관광지 선택속성이 만족도와 재방문에 미치는 영향 -강화도를 중심으로-" 한국도서(섬)학회 24 (24): 1-18, 2012

    8 김영준, "섬 관광의 동향과 지속가능한 발전 전략" 국토연구원 358 : 34-39, 2011

    9 심진범, "문화예술과 연계한 섬 관광정책 방향" 국토연구원 381 : 40-48, 2013

    10 이동호, "대학생들의 섬(도서) 지역에 대한 지식수준 분석을 통한 섬 관광활성화 방안" 한국도서(섬)학회 22 (22): 19-34, 2010

    1 "해양수산주요통계"

    2 강신겸, "커뮤니티 중심의 섬관광 개발" 경남발전연구원 24-34, 2012

    3 김상구, "중력모형을 이용한 우리나라 냉동 수산물의 교역형태 분석" 한국수산경영학회 43 (43): 19-34, 2012

    4 노래영, "섬⋅갯벌 올림픽축제 활성화 방안에 관한 연구-제1회 신안섬⋅갯벌 올림픽축제 결과를 중심으로" 한국도서(섬)학회 19 (19): 37-92, 2007

    5 이동신, "섬 연구의 특수성과 향후 발전방향 - 한국도서연구지의 발행과정과 관련하여-" 한국도서(섬)학회 22 (22): 1-24, 2010

    6 김재호, "섬 방문객의 관광동기가 관광 후 태도에 미치는 영향 연구 - 인천광역시 섬 지역을 중심으로 -" 관광경영학회 18 (18): 125-145, 2014

    7 한상겸, "섬 관광지 선택속성이 만족도와 재방문에 미치는 영향 -강화도를 중심으로-" 한국도서(섬)학회 24 (24): 1-18, 2012

    8 김영준, "섬 관광의 동향과 지속가능한 발전 전략" 국토연구원 358 : 34-39, 2011

    9 심진범, "문화예술과 연계한 섬 관광정책 방향" 국토연구원 381 : 40-48, 2013

    10 이동호, "대학생들의 섬(도서) 지역에 대한 지식수준 분석을 통한 섬 관광활성화 방안" 한국도서(섬)학회 22 (22): 19-34, 2010

    11 김은희, "대부도 와인관광을 활용한 섬 관광 활성화 방안" 한국도서(섬)학회 26 (26): 99-120, 2014

    12 김태영, "경남의 섬관광 활성화를 위한 정책제언" 경남발전연구원 2012

    13 Nunkoo, R., "Use of Structural Equation Modelling in Tourism Research: Past, Present, and Future" 52 : 759-771, 2013

    14 Sheldon, P., "Tourism Forecasting: A Review of Empirical Research" 4 : 183-195, 1985

    15 Pedroni, P., "Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels" 83 (83): 727-731, 2001

    16 Hausman, J. A, "Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects" 49 : 1377-1398, 1981

    17 Pedroni, P, "Panel Cointegration; Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests, with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis: New Results" Indiana University 1997

    18 Kao, C, "On the Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel Data" 15 : 467-474, 2000

    19 이진의, "IPA기법을 활용한 섬 생태관광지 매력요인 분석 - 여수 금오도를 중심으로 -" 한국도서(섬)학회 25 (25): 63-82, 2013

    20 Anderson, J.E, "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle" 93 : 170-192, 2003

    21 Morley, C, "Gravity Models for Tourism Demand: Theory and Use" 48 : 1-10, 2014

    22 Pedroni, P., "Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels" 15 : 93-130, 2000

    23 Head, K, "FDI as an Outcome of the Market for Corporate Control: Theory and Evidence" 74 : 2-20, 2008

    24 Nuroglu E, "Competing Specifications of the Gravity Equation: A Three-way Model, Bilateral Interaction Effects, or a Dynamic Gravity Model with Time-varying Country Effects?" 46 : 733-741, 2014

    25 Bergstrand, J.H, "A Knowledge-and-Physical-Capital Model of International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Foreign Affiliates: Developed Countries" 73 (73): 278-308, 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.42 0.42 0.42
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.44 0.43 0.573 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼