RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Through the Looking-Glass: Conway, Cavendish, and Specular Metaphors of Self-Knowledge for Early Modern Women

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109080840

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study explores Anne Conway’s and Margaret Cavendish’s critique of Cartesian and Hookean accounts of specular (self-)knowledge, at the intersections of three developments that precluded women further from pursuing knowledge in the seventeenth century: technical advances in glass mirrors and lenses, the emergence of Cartesian reflexive subjectivity based upon “double vision,” and a new partitioning and elevation of good/male over bad/female curiosity. Contemporary with Galileo’s telescopic discoveries and the heyday of Venetian glass mirrors, Cesare Ripa’s Iconologia (1603) depicted various female figures with a looking glass, adumbrating the issues and disputes to proliferate around specular metaphors and instruments with the rise of Cartesian subjectivity and experimental philosophy. It was Descartes, sceptic of mimetic mirrors, who turned the epistemic mirror inward for the soul, not eyes, to do the seeing, as surety for all ensuing knowledge. Conway refutes Descartes’s mechanist vision as incapable of seeing beneath the surface and predicates all reflection or seeing on reciprocation with objects. Unlike Descartes, Hooke was enthusiastic about the new optic glasses, to the extent of taking any glassy surfaces, including lifeless ommatidia, for the seeing eye. Cavendish defies and foregoes the Hookean glass metaphor entirely, as self-knowledge inheres in bodies, most notably, female bodies (including mermaids) in her fiction. Conway and Cavendish challenge the glasses of male curiosity, thus advocating self-knowing female bodies curious for further knowledge.
      번역하기

      This study explores Anne Conway’s and Margaret Cavendish’s critique of Cartesian and Hookean accounts of specular (self-)knowledge, at the intersections of three developments that precluded women further from pursuing knowledge in the seventeenth ...

      This study explores Anne Conway’s and Margaret Cavendish’s critique of Cartesian and Hookean accounts of specular (self-)knowledge, at the intersections of three developments that precluded women further from pursuing knowledge in the seventeenth century: technical advances in glass mirrors and lenses, the emergence of Cartesian reflexive subjectivity based upon “double vision,” and a new partitioning and elevation of good/male over bad/female curiosity. Contemporary with Galileo’s telescopic discoveries and the heyday of Venetian glass mirrors, Cesare Ripa’s Iconologia (1603) depicted various female figures with a looking glass, adumbrating the issues and disputes to proliferate around specular metaphors and instruments with the rise of Cartesian subjectivity and experimental philosophy. It was Descartes, sceptic of mimetic mirrors, who turned the epistemic mirror inward for the soul, not eyes, to do the seeing, as surety for all ensuing knowledge. Conway refutes Descartes’s mechanist vision as incapable of seeing beneath the surface and predicates all reflection or seeing on reciprocation with objects. Unlike Descartes, Hooke was enthusiastic about the new optic glasses, to the extent of taking any glassy surfaces, including lifeless ommatidia, for the seeing eye. Cavendish defies and foregoes the Hookean glass metaphor entirely, as self-knowledge inheres in bodies, most notably, female bodies (including mermaids) in her fiction. Conway and Cavendish challenge the glasses of male curiosity, thus advocating self-knowing female bodies curious for further knowledge.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최재목, "퇴계사상과 ‘거울’의 은유" 24 (24): 265-311,

      2 Campbell, Mary Baine, "Wonder and Science : Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe" Cornell UP 1999

      3 Cottegnies, Line, "Women and Curiosity in Early Modern England and France" Brill 2016

      4 Broad, Jacqueline, "Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century" Cambridge UP 2009

      5 Lascano, Marcy P., "What Kind of Monist is Anne Finch Conway?" 4 (4): 280-297, 2018

      6 Conway, Anne, "The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy" Cambridge UP 1996

      7 Melchior-Bonnet, Sabine, "The Mirror: A History" Routledge 2014

      8 Fleming, James Dougal, "The Mirror of Information in Early Modern England" Palgrave Macmillan 2016

      9 White, Carol Wayne, "The Legacy of Anne Conway (1631-1679):Reverberations from a Mystical Naturalism" State U of New York P 2008

      10 Hutton, Sarah, "The Interrogative Anne Conway: Curiosity in a Philosophical Context" 141-159,

      1 최재목, "퇴계사상과 ‘거울’의 은유" 24 (24): 265-311,

      2 Campbell, Mary Baine, "Wonder and Science : Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe" Cornell UP 1999

      3 Cottegnies, Line, "Women and Curiosity in Early Modern England and France" Brill 2016

      4 Broad, Jacqueline, "Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century" Cambridge UP 2009

      5 Lascano, Marcy P., "What Kind of Monist is Anne Finch Conway?" 4 (4): 280-297, 2018

      6 Conway, Anne, "The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy" Cambridge UP 1996

      7 Melchior-Bonnet, Sabine, "The Mirror: A History" Routledge 2014

      8 Fleming, James Dougal, "The Mirror of Information in Early Modern England" Palgrave Macmillan 2016

      9 White, Carol Wayne, "The Legacy of Anne Conway (1631-1679):Reverberations from a Mystical Naturalism" State U of New York P 2008

      10 Hutton, Sarah, "The Interrogative Anne Conway: Curiosity in a Philosophical Context" 141-159,

      11 Cavendish, Margaret, "The Description of a New World, Called the Blazing World" Broadview 2016

      12 Cavendish, Margaret, "The Convent of Pleasure and Other Plays" Johns Hopkins UP 1999

      13 Georgescu, Laura, "Self-knowledge, Perception, and Margaret Cavendish’s Metaphysics of the Individual" 25 (25): 618-639, 2020

      14 Mudde, Anna, "Self-Images and ‘Perspicuous Representations’: Reflection, Philosophy, and the Glass Mirror" 46 (46): 539-554, 2015

      15 Shuger, Deborah, "Renaissance Culture and the Everyday" U Pennsylvania P 21-41, 1998

      16 Hutton, Sarah, "Receptions of Descartes:Cartesianism and anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe" Routledge 3-23, 2005

      17 Lee, Kyoo, "Reading Descartes Otherwise: Blind, Mad, Dreamy, and Bad" Fordham UP 2013

      18 Cavendish, Margaret, "Poems and Fancies with The Animal Parliament" Iter 2018

      19 Descartes, René, "Optics. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes Volume I" Cambridge UP 152-175, 1985

      20 Cavendish, Margaret, "Observations upon Experimental Philosophy" Cambridge UP 2001

      21 Pugliese, Nastassja, "Monism and Individuation in Anne Conway as a Critique of Spinoza" 27 (27): 771-785, 2019

      22 Hooke, Robert, "Micrographia, or, Some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses with observations and inquiries thereupon"

      23 Wiseman, Susan, "Mermaids, Women and Curiosity in Seventeenth-Century England"

      24 Pedersen, Tara E., "Mermaids and the Production of Knowledge in Early Modern England" Routledge 2015

      25 이시연, "Libertas philosophandi and Cloistered Women in Margaret Cavendish’s The Convent of Pleasure" 19 (19): 31-66, 2022

      26 Ripa, Cesare, "Iconologia: or Moral Emblems"

      27 Reeves, Eileen, "Galileo’s Glassworks: The Telescope and the Mirror" Harvard UP 2008

      28 Brailowsky, Yan, "From Genesitic Curiosity to Dangerous Gynocracy in Sixteenth-Century England" 27-40,

      29 Pellegrin, Marie-Frédérique, "Female Curiosity and Male Curiosity about Women: The Views of the Cartesian Philosophers" 160-174,

      30 Gallagher, Catherine, "Embracing the Absolute: The Politics of the Female Subject in Seventeenth-Century England" 1 (1): 24-39, 1988

      31 Aulisio, George J., "Descartes’s Epistemic Commitment to Telescopes and Microscopes" 58 (58): 405-437, 2019

      32 Kenny, Neil, "Curiosity in Early Modern Europe: Word Histories" Harrassowitz 1998

      33 Bell, Susan Groag, "Christine de Pizan in Her Study" 2008

      34 Harth, Erica, "Cartesian Women: Versions and Subversions of Rational Discourse in the Old Regime" Cornell UP 1992

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼