This study investigated the basic architectural planning of Youth Housing, hypothesizing that differences in perception regarding architectural elements—based on age group, household type, and marital status—significantly impact young people's res...
This study investigated the basic architectural planning of Youth Housing, hypothesizing that differences in perception regarding architectural elements—based on age group, household type, and marital status—significantly impact young people's residential satisfaction. The goal was to understand residential characteristics and propose customized design directions reflective of generational needs.
Key Findings by Demographic Group
Analysis Method: Survey of young people aged 19–39, analyzed using independent samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA.
Age Group Differences: Significant differences were found in exclusive floor area, balcony/utility room, and view.
35-39 age group preferred larger exclusive areas for comfort/privacy and showed a high preference for balcony/utility rooms for efficiency.
Ages 30 and over valued view assurance for quality of life and psychological stability.
Early 30s prioritized parking convenience (need increasing with age).
Late 30s scored high on the diversity and necessity of community facilities, while late 20s preferred practical convenience facilities.
Household Type Differences (2+ people): Significant factors included preference for duplex layouts, ventilation performance, and the aging of materials. In shared areas, factors like exterior design, parking convenience/security, building security systems (CCTV), and the quality of community facilities were significant.
Marital Status Differences (Married Group): Significant differences were observed across almost all private and shared areas, excluding built-in items and convenience facilities.
Study Implications and Recommendations
The study concluded that the current standardized supply and architectural planning of Youth Housing must be improved to meet diverse needs. Recommendations include:
Unit Layouts (Private Space): Configure floor plans to reflect individual activities and leisure space, moving beyond fixed minimum areas.
Auxiliary Space: Discourage balcony expansion and instead plan for a multi-functional utility room (for laundry/drying).
Well-being: Implement eco-friendly design to secure views and ensure proper natural light and ventilation for emotional/psychological satisfaction.
Shared Facilities: Enhance parking convenience through customized/shared spaces and establish age-tailored, exchange-supportive community facilities.
Convenience: Reinforce unmanned automated convenience facilities.
Significance: This research provides the empirical evidence needed to shift future supply-focused rental housing policies to a demand-centered approach by offering basic data for customized housing design based on young people's specific needs and lifestyles.