RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      청 제국의 지배이념과 지배체제 = Rules and ideology of the Qing Empire

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101897221

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      By addressing that today China’s territorial boundaries and ethnic composition were largely built on the historical legacy of the imperial China, this paper aims to analyze the ruling structure and ideology that had sustained the complex and diverse aspects of the Qing empire. This paper especially focuses on recent studies published in Japan and the US. It has been widely known that since the early twentieth century the Japanese scholarship has paid special attentions to close connections between the Mongols and Manchus, further highlighting the Inner Asian tradition and the Tibetan Buddhism in the Qing rule. Notably, since the late 1990s, the so-called New Qing History in the US has questioned the conventional assumptions about sinicization and raised a new concern with the Manchus and their relationship to China, as well as that of other non-Han groups under the Qing rule. Through introducing the scholarly literature written in Japanese and English, this paper explores the various elements of Qing government structures and ruling ideology, and rediscovers the Qing as an Inner Asian, as well as a Chinese, empire. By so doing, it shows that given the persistent difficulties the Chinese Communist Party faces in extending its Chinese national vision to Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia, the revelation of features of the Qing imperial ruling can retain a great significance today.
      번역하기

      By addressing that today China’s territorial boundaries and ethnic composition were largely built on the historical legacy of the imperial China, this paper aims to analyze the ruling structure and ideology that had sustained the complex and diverse...

      By addressing that today China’s territorial boundaries and ethnic composition were largely built on the historical legacy of the imperial China, this paper aims to analyze the ruling structure and ideology that had sustained the complex and diverse aspects of the Qing empire. This paper especially focuses on recent studies published in Japan and the US. It has been widely known that since the early twentieth century the Japanese scholarship has paid special attentions to close connections between the Mongols and Manchus, further highlighting the Inner Asian tradition and the Tibetan Buddhism in the Qing rule. Notably, since the late 1990s, the so-called New Qing History in the US has questioned the conventional assumptions about sinicization and raised a new concern with the Manchus and their relationship to China, as well as that of other non-Han groups under the Qing rule. Through introducing the scholarly literature written in Japanese and English, this paper explores the various elements of Qing government structures and ruling ideology, and rediscovers the Qing as an Inner Asian, as well as a Chinese, empire. By so doing, it shows that given the persistent difficulties the Chinese Communist Party faces in extending its Chinese national vision to Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia, the revelation of features of the Qing imperial ruling can retain a great significance today.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 백영서, "핵심현장에서 동아시아를 다시 묻다" 창비 2013

      2 Fairbank, John F., "캠브리지 중국사: 청 제국 말, 1800-1911, 전4권" 새물결 10-11, 2007

      3 구범진, "청나라, 키메라의 제국" 민음사 [서울] 2012

      4 이시하마 유미코, "중앙유라시아의 역사" 소나무 2005

      5 吉澤誠一郎, "중국근현대사 1: 청조와 근대세계, 19세기" 삼천리 2013

      6 유정아, "준가르부 침공기간(1728-1733) 중 청조의 티베트 지배의 실상" 한국중국학회 (59) : 275-295, 2009

      7 이삼성, "제국" 小花 2014

      8 강진아, "문명제국에서 국민국가로" 창비 2009

      9 茂木敏夫, "淸末における中國の創出と日本" (10) : 1995

      10 岡洋樹, "淸朝の外藩モンゴル統治における新政の位置" (725) : 2010

      1 백영서, "핵심현장에서 동아시아를 다시 묻다" 창비 2013

      2 Fairbank, John F., "캠브리지 중국사: 청 제국 말, 1800-1911, 전4권" 새물결 10-11, 2007

      3 구범진, "청나라, 키메라의 제국" 민음사 [서울] 2012

      4 이시하마 유미코, "중앙유라시아의 역사" 소나무 2005

      5 吉澤誠一郎, "중국근현대사 1: 청조와 근대세계, 19세기" 삼천리 2013

      6 유정아, "준가르부 침공기간(1728-1733) 중 청조의 티베트 지배의 실상" 한국중국학회 (59) : 275-295, 2009

      7 이삼성, "제국" 小花 2014

      8 강진아, "문명제국에서 국민국가로" 창비 2009

      9 茂木敏夫, "淸末における中國の創出と日本" (10) : 1995

      10 岡洋樹, "淸朝の外藩モンゴル統治における新政の位置" (725) : 2010

      11 杉山淸彦, "淸朝とは何か" 藤原書店 2009

      12 岸本美緖, "淸朝とは何か" 藤原書店 2009

      13 村上信明, "淸朝とは何か" 藤原書店 2009

      14 岡田英弘, "淸朝とは何か" 藤原書店 2009

      15 송미령, "淸 중기 總理事務王大臣 체제와 정국운영" 동양사학회 (124) : 179-210, 2013

      16 岡洋樹, "東北アジア地域史と淸朝の帝國統治" (642) : 2003

      17 片岡一忠, "朝賀規定からみた淸朝と外藩朝貢國の關係" (52) : 1998

      18 전인갑, "帝國에서 帝國性 國民國家로(Ⅱ)— 제국의 지배전략과 근대적 재구성" 한국중국학회 (66) : 243-274, 2012

      19 전인갑, "帝國에서 帝國性 國民國家로(Ⅰ) ― 제국의 구조와 이념 ―" 한국중국학회 (65) : 161-183, 2012

      20 杉山正明, "帝國の硏究-原理類型關係" 名古屋大學出版會 2003

      21 山本有造, "帝國の硏究-原理類型關係" 名古屋大學出版會 2003

      22 杉山淸彦, "大淸帝國の支配構造と八旗制- マンジュ王朝として國制試論" 18 : 2009

      23 平野聰, "大淸帝國と中華の混迷" 講談社 2007

      24 毛里和子, "周緣からの中國 : 民族問題と國家" 東京大學出版會 1998

      25 川島真, "シリーズ中国近現代史2 : 近代国家への模索, 1894-1925" 삼천리 2013

      26 Crossley, Pamela K, "Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology" University of California Press 1999

      27 Sutton, Donald S., "The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State" University of Pennsylvania Press 2005

      28 Crossley, Pamela K, "The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State" University of Pennsylvania Press 2005

      29 Perdue, Peter C., "The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State" University of Pennsylvania Press 2005

      30 Kirby, William C., "The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State" University of Pennsylvania Press 2005

      31 Callahan, William A, "Sino-speak : Chinese Eceptionalism and the Politics of History" 71 (71): 2012

      32 Lopez Jr., Donald S., "New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde" RoutledgeCurzon 2004

      33 Millward, James A., "New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde" RoutledgeCurzon 2004

      34 Herman, John E., "Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China" University of California Press 2006

      35 Lipman, Jonathan N, "Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China" University of California Press 2006

      36 Crossley, Pamela K., "Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China" University of California Press 2006

      37 Millward, James A., "Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China" University of California Press 2006

      38 Crossley, Pamela K, "Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China" University of California Press 2006

      39 Elliott, Mark C., "Elliott and Philippe Forȇt. New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde" RoutledgeCurzon 2004

      40 Dunnell, Ruth W., "Elliott and Philippe Forȇt. New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde" RoutledgeCurzon 2004

      41 김성수, "17世紀初 滿蒙 關係와 內陸 아시아 -만주-호르친・몽골 관계를 중심으로-" 중국사학회 (82) : 61-92, 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-11-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SA-CHONG(sa) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.11 1.11 0.84
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.73 0.71 1.55 0.54
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼