RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      전쟁과 재난으로 보는 동아시아안전공동체 = East Asian Safe Community in view of Wars and Disasters

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101897222

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      To respond to the ‘East Japan Tsunami’ occurred at 14:46 on March 11, 2011, the Global Institute for Japan Studies (former Center for Japanese Studies) of Korea University immediately operated the so-called ‘Earthquake Analysis Team’ from March 14, 2011, which was three days after the occurrence date of the severe earthquake. The starting point was to expect that Japan would take passive and introvert aspects in any forms after the severe damage. Since the launch, the team discovered several keywords based on the achievements made over the past five years. The keywords set for the first time included ‘disaster (accident), safety and East Asia’, which have been useful and important until now. Next, the team was interested in how to figure out the disasters/accidents of Japan from the point of view of South Korea, which reflected self-reflection of the achievements of the research team focused only on translation of the Japanese researches on disasters. On such reflection, this research focused on ‘human safety’ and ‘safe community’ putting first ‘human’ and ‘coexistence’. These are matched with the keywords of the existing symposiums including ‘lessons from the disaster’, ‘cooperation of disaster research’ and ‘coexistence from the field’ and ‘pursuit of safe community’. The counterparts of ‘safety’ in the human society should not only be ‘disasters’ or ‘accidents’. ‘War’ will also have a huge significance. Then it is only natural that ‘disaster and safety’ is related to ‘war and security’. In other words, ‘war and peace’ is in the two-sided relationship with ‘disaster and safety’. Lastly, the ‘theory of East Asian safe community’ should be established for coexistence, symbiosis and co-prosperity of the East Asian world. There should be no rooms for such goals to be intervened by any political intentions or impure thoughts. Even if the ‘theory of East Asian safe community’ has yet to be completed, it is considered not to put off the issue as a college student given that university is a member of the society.
      번역하기

      To respond to the ‘East Japan Tsunami’ occurred at 14:46 on March 11, 2011, the Global Institute for Japan Studies (former Center for Japanese Studies) of Korea University immediately operated the so-called ‘Earthquake Analysis Team’ from Marc...

      To respond to the ‘East Japan Tsunami’ occurred at 14:46 on March 11, 2011, the Global Institute for Japan Studies (former Center for Japanese Studies) of Korea University immediately operated the so-called ‘Earthquake Analysis Team’ from March 14, 2011, which was three days after the occurrence date of the severe earthquake. The starting point was to expect that Japan would take passive and introvert aspects in any forms after the severe damage. Since the launch, the team discovered several keywords based on the achievements made over the past five years. The keywords set for the first time included ‘disaster (accident), safety and East Asia’, which have been useful and important until now. Next, the team was interested in how to figure out the disasters/accidents of Japan from the point of view of South Korea, which reflected self-reflection of the achievements of the research team focused only on translation of the Japanese researches on disasters. On such reflection, this research focused on ‘human safety’ and ‘safe community’ putting first ‘human’ and ‘coexistence’. These are matched with the keywords of the existing symposiums including ‘lessons from the disaster’, ‘cooperation of disaster research’ and ‘coexistence from the field’ and ‘pursuit of safe community’. The counterparts of ‘safety’ in the human society should not only be ‘disasters’ or ‘accidents’. ‘War’ will also have a huge significance. Then it is only natural that ‘disaster and safety’ is related to ‘war and security’. In other words, ‘war and peace’ is in the two-sided relationship with ‘disaster and safety’. Lastly, the ‘theory of East Asian safe community’ should be established for coexistence, symbiosis and co-prosperity of the East Asian world. There should be no rooms for such goals to be intervened by any political intentions or impure thoughts. Even if the ‘theory of East Asian safe community’ has yet to be completed, it is considered not to put off the issue as a college student given that university is a member of the society.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김현구, "한일 상호간 집단거주지의 역사적 연구" 경인문화사 2011

      2 하라 아키라, "청일러일전쟁 어떻게 볼 것인가" 살림 2015

      3 하라다 게이치, "청일러일전쟁" 어문학사 2012

      4 한명기, "정묘병자호란과 동아시아" 푸른역사 2009

      5 송완범, "저팬리뷰2012-3.11 동일본대지진과 일본-" 문 2012

      6 서승원, "저팬리뷰 2013" 고려대학교출판부 2013

      7 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" 역사비평사 1999

      8 김현구, "임나일본부설은 허구인가" 창비 2010

      9 송완범, "일본의 재해부흥-3.11 동일본대지진과 인간-" 인문사 2014

      10 김현구, "일본의 대외위기론과 팽창의 역사적 구조" 제이앤씨 2008

      1 김현구, "한일 상호간 집단거주지의 역사적 연구" 경인문화사 2011

      2 하라 아키라, "청일러일전쟁 어떻게 볼 것인가" 살림 2015

      3 하라다 게이치, "청일러일전쟁" 어문학사 2012

      4 한명기, "정묘병자호란과 동아시아" 푸른역사 2009

      5 송완범, "저팬리뷰2012-3.11 동일본대지진과 일본-" 문 2012

      6 서승원, "저팬리뷰 2013" 고려대학교출판부 2013

      7 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" 역사비평사 1999

      8 김현구, "임나일본부설은 허구인가" 창비 2010

      9 송완범, "일본의 재해부흥-3.11 동일본대지진과 인간-" 인문사 2014

      10 김현구, "일본의 대외위기론과 팽창의 역사적 구조" 제이앤씨 2008

      11 김현구, "백제는 일본의 기원인가" 창비 2002

      12 학습원여자대학, "동일본대지진-부흥을 위한 인문학적 모색-" 고려대학교출판부 2013

      13 관서대학 사회안전학부, "검증 3.11동일본대지진" 문 2012

      14 歴史学研究会, "震災核災害の時代と歴史学" 青木書店 2012

      15 "西嶋定生東アジア史論集 (全5巻)" 岩波書店 2002

      16 "石母田正著作集 (全16巻)" 岩波書店 2000

      17 송완범, "白村江싸움과 倭-東아시아세계의 재편과 관련하여-" 한국고대사학회 (45) : 69-96, 2007

      18 平川南, "環境の日本史 (全5巻)" 吉川広文館 2013

      19 公益財団法人史学会, "災害環境から戦争を読む" 山川出版社 2015

      20 桃木至朗, "海域アジア史硏究入門" 岩波書店 2011

      21 東北文化研究センター, "東北学" はる書房 2014

      22 国分良成, "東アジア研究所講座『世界のなかの東アジア』" 慶応義塾大学東アジア研究所 2006

      23 進藤榮一, "東アジア共同体をどうつくるか" ちくま新書 2007

      24 廣瀨憲雄, "東アジアの国際秩序と古代日本" 吉川弘文館 2011

      25 王勇, "奈良平安期の日中文化交流-ブックロードの視点から-" 農文協 2001

      26 廣瀨憲雄, "古代日本外交史-東部ユーラシアの視点から読み直す-" 講談社 2014

      27 鄭淳一, "九世紀の來航新羅人と日本列島" 勉誠出版 2011

      28 송완범, "‘環東海지역’의 災難·安全으로 생각하는 ‘環東海學’" 국제지역연구원 19 (19): 87-111, 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-11-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SA-CHONG(sa) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.11 1.11 0.84
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.73 0.71 1.55 0.54
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼