RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    違憲條約의 效力과 司法審査 = Validity of Unconstitutional Treaty and Judicial Review

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40109549

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Any discussion of the relationship between international Law and municipal Law must itself with two main problems.
    First, there is the theoretical question of whether international Law and municipal Law are part of a universal legal order(monism), or form two distinct systems of Law(dualism).
    Secondly, a court may be faced with the practical difficulty of reaching a decision where there exists a conflict between the rules of international Law and the rules of municipal Law relevant to the particular sitution.
    The object of the present discussion is to ascertain in what manner and to what extent municipal courts do apply a rule of international Law.
    A further question is, how far a rule of municipal Law will be applied by a municipal court if is a ctually conflicts with a rule of municipal Law judge-made statutory rule.
    The answers to these questions will be found to require distinctions to be made, on the one hand, between customary and treaty rules of international Law; and on the other between statutory and judge-made municipal Law.
    Based on this premise, this study atempts to clarify the relationship between treaties and constitution focused on the formality of concluding treaties and the effect.
    Common throughout the constutional provisions and constitutional traditions of various nation is their recognition of the national validity of treaties.
    Conflicts between treaties and constitutional involve both discrepancies in contents and conclusion procedures that run counter to the constiution.
    The constitutional system of modern states seeks to achieve harmony in contents between the two statutroy entities under the principle of public Law unity.
    In practice, too, the two statutroy entities are being adjusted to another from the viewpoint of respecting treaties and increasing trends twoard internationalism.
    번역하기

    Any discussion of the relationship between international Law and municipal Law must itself with two main problems. First, there is the theoretical question of whether international Law and municipal Law are part of a universal legal order(monism), or...

    Any discussion of the relationship between international Law and municipal Law must itself with two main problems.
    First, there is the theoretical question of whether international Law and municipal Law are part of a universal legal order(monism), or form two distinct systems of Law(dualism).
    Secondly, a court may be faced with the practical difficulty of reaching a decision where there exists a conflict between the rules of international Law and the rules of municipal Law relevant to the particular sitution.
    The object of the present discussion is to ascertain in what manner and to what extent municipal courts do apply a rule of international Law.
    A further question is, how far a rule of municipal Law will be applied by a municipal court if is a ctually conflicts with a rule of municipal Law judge-made statutory rule.
    The answers to these questions will be found to require distinctions to be made, on the one hand, between customary and treaty rules of international Law; and on the other between statutory and judge-made municipal Law.
    Based on this premise, this study atempts to clarify the relationship between treaties and constitution focused on the formality of concluding treaties and the effect.
    Common throughout the constutional provisions and constitutional traditions of various nation is their recognition of the national validity of treaties.
    Conflicts between treaties and constitutional involve both discrepancies in contents and conclusion procedures that run counter to the constiution.
    The constitutional system of modern states seeks to achieve harmony in contents between the two statutroy entities under the principle of public Law unity.
    In practice, too, the two statutroy entities are being adjusted to another from the viewpoint of respecting treaties and increasing trends twoard internationalism.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 序言
    • Ⅱ. 內容的 違憲條約의 效力
    • 1. 二元論
    • 2. 一元論
    • 3. 結論
    • Ⅰ. 序言
    • Ⅱ. 內容的 違憲條約의 效力
    • 1. 二元論
    • 2. 一元論
    • 3. 結論
    • Ⅲ. 形式的 違憲條約의 效力
    • 1. 國內法的 效力
    • 2. 國際法的 效力
    • Ⅳ. 行政協定의 國內的 效力問題
    • Ⅴ. 條約의 違憲審査
    • 1. 條約의 違憲審査 可能性
    • 2. 違憲條約의 審査機關
    • Ⅵ. 結言
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼