RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      벼 재배방법에 따른 기대소득의 확률우위성 분석 = Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Expected Income by Rice Cultivation Practices

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106606102

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Recently, no-tillage cultivation practice of rice are receiving great attention from agricultural researchers, policy makers and farmers because it is related to environmentally friendly practice to reduce carbon and greenhouse gasses and to cope with...

      Recently, no-tillage cultivation practice of rice are receiving great attention from agricultural researchers, policy makers and farmers because it is related to environmentally friendly practice to reduce carbon and greenhouse gasses and to cope with labor shortage and rapid aging of workforce in the agricultural sector. Among the interest groups, farmers are final decision makers weather to accept or not the practice compared to other cultivation practices of rice is available to farmers, especially regarding the economic outcome under uncertainty. Fortunately, National institute of Crop Science(NICS) produced data for yields and greenhouse gas emissions from several practices including no-tillage practice with three years experiments in rice fields. This study analysis the economic outcome of several cultivation practices under uncertainty with the field data obtained from NICS from 2014 to year 2016, during which the practices include tillage, wet-direct seeding, partial tillage and no-tillage. For the analysis we introduce farmers risk preference to reflect his/her risk averse attitude and adopt stochastic dominance analysis, which are basically grounded on simulation techniques and utility function. We form empirical distribution functions and beta distribution functions for each alternative practice, where the former are based on empirical field data and latter based on the best fitted distribution functions from empirical data. The negative exponential utility function is adopted to refect farmers risk aversion coefficient with constant absolute risk aversion(CARA). This study also provides confidence premium(risk premium) that makes indifferent between the most preferred practice(the base practice) and the comparable alternatives according to the mix of risk preference and magnitude of cost saving. The premium is a kind of compensation to be given to farmers for choosing one alternative to the other alternative. The bigger the premium, the harder the alternation of alternatives from the most preferred practice(the base practice). This study is expected to be helpful to farmers decision making for adoption of cultivation practices of rice. Farmers can choose the best alternative according to their risk preference among the rankings of alternatives determined by the mix of risk preference and magnitude of cost saving. In addition, policy makers can choose any alternatives desirable to protect the environment and support the selected alternative with appropriate government programs.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 연구방법 Ⅲ. 분석자료 Ⅳ. 분석결과 Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 연구방법 Ⅲ. 분석자료 Ⅳ. 분석결과 Ⅴ. 결론
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼