RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    노인 돌봄 가족을 지원하는 지역사회 서비스: 한국과 미국의 비교를 통한 정책 제언 = Community Services Supporting Family Caregivers for the Elderly: Lessons from the Comparison between Korea and the United States

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103852815

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to provide useful insights into community-level support services for family caregivers in Korea by comparing them with the services in the United States. Similar to most developed countries, life expectancy has led to rapid population aging in Korea over the last several decades. However, despite increased social needs of long-term care for the elderly, many elderly Koreans are still dependent on their family for the long-term care. Yet, existing support programs for family caregivers are very limited. As a result, family caregivers often suffer from a lack of financial resources and emotional support. In this study, we comprehensively review the extensive literature, including relevant studies and documents of community-level support services for family caregivers of the elderly at home in Korea and the United States. One of the most important differences is that compared to Korea, diverse services based on the law of NFCSP to support the family caregivers, such as counseling, organization of support group, and educating have been available in the United States since 2000. Additionally, the legal definition of family caregivers in the United State is broader than that in Korea, where family caregivers are limited to those who are related by blood or marriage. Therefore, more caregivers are eligible for support programs and benefit from the programs in the United States. The findings of the study suggest that policy makers in Korea should legislate for diverse and comprehensive services for family caregivers. Further, it is necessary to define legal terms for family caregivers more broadly to extend beneficiaries of the programs.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to provide useful insights into community-level support services for family caregivers in Korea by comparing them with the services in the United States. Similar to most developed countries, life expectancy has led to rapi...

    The purpose of this study is to provide useful insights into community-level support services for family caregivers in Korea by comparing them with the services in the United States. Similar to most developed countries, life expectancy has led to rapid population aging in Korea over the last several decades. However, despite increased social needs of long-term care for the elderly, many elderly Koreans are still dependent on their family for the long-term care. Yet, existing support programs for family caregivers are very limited. As a result, family caregivers often suffer from a lack of financial resources and emotional support. In this study, we comprehensively review the extensive literature, including relevant studies and documents of community-level support services for family caregivers of the elderly at home in Korea and the United States. One of the most important differences is that compared to Korea, diverse services based on the law of NFCSP to support the family caregivers, such as counseling, organization of support group, and educating have been available in the United States since 2000. Additionally, the legal definition of family caregivers in the United State is broader than that in Korea, where family caregivers are limited to those who are related by blood or marriage. Therefore, more caregivers are eligible for support programs and benefit from the programs in the United States. The findings of the study suggest that policy makers in Korea should legislate for diverse and comprehensive services for family caregivers. Further, it is necessary to define legal terms for family caregivers more broadly to extend beneficiaries of the programs.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 권재문, "친자간의 협조의무 ― 비교법적 연구와 입법론 ―" 법학연구소 13 (13): 371-397, 2012

    2 임정기, "중고령층의 부모수발 여부에 따른 삶의 만족도 변화에 대한 종단적 연구 : 잠재성장모형의 적용" 한국노인복지학회 (51) : 215-246, 2011

    3 한경혜, "미국의 농촌노인을 위한 지역사회보호 지원프로그램" 한국지역사회생활과학회 13 (13): 77-86, 2002

    4 장동민, "미국 장기요양보허정책의 운영 경험 및 개혁 논의의 시사점" 한국보건사회학회 18 : 81-114, 2005

    5 이주재, "노인장기요양 인력의 직무 스트레스와 직무 만족이 이직 의도에 미치는 영향" 한국노년학회 31 (31): 277-290, 2011

    6 최현석, "노인의 생활전반 만족에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 한국데이터정보과학회 23 (23): 131-142, 2012

    7 최희경, "노부모를 돌보는 아들의 돌봄 경험에 관한 탐색적 연구" 한국노인복지학회 (55) : 7-32, 2012

    8 김미혜, "고령화 한국사회의 부양체계 구축을 위한 연구:성공적 노후 삶의 유형별 부양체계 분석을 통하여" 한국노년학회 26 (26): 617-639, 2006

    9 김영옥, "가족에 의한 노인돌봄서비스 가치 추정" 한국여성정책연구원 (1) : 181-215, 2011

    10 United Nations, "World population aging 2009"

    1 권재문, "친자간의 협조의무 ― 비교법적 연구와 입법론 ―" 법학연구소 13 (13): 371-397, 2012

    2 임정기, "중고령층의 부모수발 여부에 따른 삶의 만족도 변화에 대한 종단적 연구 : 잠재성장모형의 적용" 한국노인복지학회 (51) : 215-246, 2011

    3 한경혜, "미국의 농촌노인을 위한 지역사회보호 지원프로그램" 한국지역사회생활과학회 13 (13): 77-86, 2002

    4 장동민, "미국 장기요양보허정책의 운영 경험 및 개혁 논의의 시사점" 한국보건사회학회 18 : 81-114, 2005

    5 이주재, "노인장기요양 인력의 직무 스트레스와 직무 만족이 이직 의도에 미치는 영향" 한국노년학회 31 (31): 277-290, 2011

    6 최현석, "노인의 생활전반 만족에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 한국데이터정보과학회 23 (23): 131-142, 2012

    7 최희경, "노부모를 돌보는 아들의 돌봄 경험에 관한 탐색적 연구" 한국노인복지학회 (55) : 7-32, 2012

    8 김미혜, "고령화 한국사회의 부양체계 구축을 위한 연구:성공적 노후 삶의 유형별 부양체계 분석을 통하여" 한국노년학회 26 (26): 617-639, 2006

    9 김영옥, "가족에 의한 노인돌봄서비스 가치 추정" 한국여성정책연구원 (1) : 181-215, 2011

    10 United Nations, "World population aging 2009"

    11 Kim, D. L, "Where are the lots of caregivers? The Pressian"

    12 Bodenheimer, T. S., "Understanding health policy : a clinical approach" McGraw-Hill Medical 2005

    13 Korean Statistical Information Service, "The ratio of care and caregiver for the elderly"

    14 Sloane, P. D., "The public health impact of Alzheimer’s disease, 2000-2050 : Potential implication of treatment advances" 23 : 213-231, 2002

    15 Choi, I. H., "The policy for the family caring the elderly : for the improvement and additional support of long-term care institution" Korean Women’s Development Institute 2011

    16 Ministry of Health and Welfare, "The information for the dementia"

    17 Choi, I. H., "The effect of long-term care insurance on family" 22 (22): 89-92, 2011

    18 안미영, "The Changing Shape of Care-time Diamond: Social Care Expansions in the 21st Century in Korea" 한국사회정책학회 19 (19): 137-161, 2012

    19 Korea Health and Welfare Information Service, "Social service voucher"

    20 Korea Law, "Social security act"

    21 Konrad. T. R., "North Carolina long term care workforce turnover survey: Descriptive results, 2007" North Carolina Institute on Aging 2008

    22 Seoul National University Hospital., "Nationwide study on the prevalence of dementia in Korea elders" Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs 2008

    23 Korea Law, "Law of long-term care insurance"

    24 Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Investigation on the Aged" The Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2011

    25 Jo, H. K., "Introduction to healthy families" Shin-Jung 2005

    26 Gelardin, S., "Introducing the family caregiver wellness model" 23 (23): 150-156, 2007

    27 Healthy Family Support Centers., "Information on the family support services"

    28 Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Information and notice"

    29 Long-Term Care Insurance, "Information"

    30 Kim, S. H., "Homo hundred: Shock or disaster?"

    31 Administration on Aging, "Family caregiver support program"

    32 The Editorial, "Does long-term care start reconstructing in this situation?"

    33 Yoo, S. H., "Comparative study on the older citizens act between Korea and U. S. A. : Proposing some comments related to the amendments of the older Koreans act" 14 : 141-163, 2001

    34 Haigler, D. H., "Caring for You, Caring for Me" 학지사 2011

    35 Standing, G., "Care work: Overcoming insecurity and neglect, In Care work: The quest for security" International Labour Office 15-31, 2001

    36 Jang, H. K., "Care work of family" Korean Women’s Development Institute 2006

    37 Lee, H. S., "An analysis on the management longterm care insurance" The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea 2012

    38 Family Caregiver Alliance, "About FCA"

    39 Feinberg, L. F., "A study of 10 states since passage of the national family caregiver support program : policies, perceptions, and program development" 44 (44): 760-769, 2004

    40 Riggs, J. A., "A family caregiver policy agenda for the twentyfirst century" 27 (27): 68-73, 2003

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-11 통합 KCI등재
    2013-06-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한가정학회지 -> Family and Environment Research
    외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association -> Family and Environment Research
    KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-11-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.76 0.76 0.96
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.02 1.04 1.279 0.17
    더보기
    해외이동버튼