RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      LMX 차별화: 연구의 동향과 과제

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100576842

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of the present study was to develop research agendas for future studies by critiquely reviewing research results conducted thus far concerning LMX(Leader-Member Exchange) differentials. For the last 30 years, LMX theory rooted in social exchange theory yielded distinctive research results in such areas as antecedents and outcomes of LMX, developmental stages of leader-member relations, social network analysis, and what not. Recently, however, scholars came to a conclusion that rather than taking a in- or out-group dyadic perspective it is more appropriate to take a group level perspective, focusing on the within-group percentages of in- vs. out-group members, namely, LMX differentials. After reviewing articles on LMX differentials published so far, several conclusions have accrued as in: firstly, the effects of LMX differentials are stronger on attitudinal outcomes such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, innovativeness than on performances; secondly, instead of taking solely group level perspective it is more effective to look at the differentials from multi-level perspectives across individual, dyadic, as well as group levels of analysis; thirdly, the differential-outcome relations are moderated by group traits, job characteristics, organizational justice, and role clarity; finally, the results differ depending on whether means of modes are used in measuring LMX differentials. Considering few studies conducted on LMX differentials in Korea, the present review is expected to attract more attention from diverse leadership researchers. Future research directions are also discussed.
      번역하기

      The purpose of the present study was to develop research agendas for future studies by critiquely reviewing research results conducted thus far concerning LMX(Leader-Member Exchange) differentials. For the last 30 years, LMX theory rooted in social ex...

      The purpose of the present study was to develop research agendas for future studies by critiquely reviewing research results conducted thus far concerning LMX(Leader-Member Exchange) differentials. For the last 30 years, LMX theory rooted in social exchange theory yielded distinctive research results in such areas as antecedents and outcomes of LMX, developmental stages of leader-member relations, social network analysis, and what not. Recently, however, scholars came to a conclusion that rather than taking a in- or out-group dyadic perspective it is more appropriate to take a group level perspective, focusing on the within-group percentages of in- vs. out-group members, namely, LMX differentials. After reviewing articles on LMX differentials published so far, several conclusions have accrued as in: firstly, the effects of LMX differentials are stronger on attitudinal outcomes such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, innovativeness than on performances; secondly, instead of taking solely group level perspective it is more effective to look at the differentials from multi-level perspectives across individual, dyadic, as well as group levels of analysis; thirdly, the differential-outcome relations are moderated by group traits, job characteristics, organizational justice, and role clarity; finally, the results differ depending on whether means of modes are used in measuring LMX differentials. Considering few studies conducted on LMX differentials in Korea, the present review is expected to attract more attention from diverse leadership researchers. Future research directions are also discussed.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼