박영희·임화 비평의 사유 체계와 인식소들 = The thinking system and recognition factors of Park, Young-hee and Im, Hwa’s criticism

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper compared and reviewed the identification of the thinking system shown in the review of Park, Young-hee and Im, hwa. It was a medieval recognition center for Marxism and the relationship between objective existence and subjective will. As discussed in chapter 2, the overall confusion of Park Young-hee's criticism was attributed to the loss of a sense of balance between the two. In some ways, it is possible to say that Park's critical nature has not changed at all. That's because Park's comments are seen as a product of consistent subjective will. In the end, he is judged to have failed to reach an objective perception of the empirical reality he is involved in.
On the other hand, Im, hwa's criticism seems to have been trying to consistently carry out the adventures of the thinking, which pursues the dialectical unification of the objective and subjective. As discussed in Chapter 3, sources of cause and recognition theory of clinical criticism were the exercise of the conceptual power and purpose of the mind represented by the romantic spirit. And it served as a principle of unwavering criticism in the context of romanticism and realism, a long way from sustaining the whole cause of pregnancy. This aspect continues to the post-liberation criticism, especially in the late 1930s, when the reality of the forestry criticism unfolds.
Marx's repeated emphasis was not on subjective activities but on historical aspects of empirical reality. Marx's thought, who wanted to move from ‘abstract’ to ‘concrete’ through historical materialism, is also here. Marx's plans and intentions can be understood, for example, through the framework of Marx's representative work, Capital. After all, it would be fair to assume that the place where Marx ultimately wanted to reach was a reality itself as a world of facts and vast land that cannot be redeemed by any principle. In this regard, the record of KAPF's historical failure is likely to be reversed again, and I think the internal logic of the process also needs to be reconstructed based on the empirical reality of colonial Joseon.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김영민, "한국근대문학비평사" 소명출판 75-, 1999

2 손유경, "프로문학의 감성구조" 소명출판 2012

3 칼 마르크스, "칼 맑스․프리드리히 엥겔스 저작 선집 2" 박종철출판사 1990

4 임규찬, "카프비평자료총서 I~VIII" 태학사 1990

5 송민호, "카프 초기 문예론의 전개와 과학적 이상주의의 영향 : 회월 박영희의 사상적 전회 과정과 그 의미" 한국문학연구소 (42) : 146-179, 2012

6 최병구, "초기 프로문학에 나타난 ‘감성’과 ‘제도’의 문제" 한국문학연구학회 (47) : 159-189, 2012

7 칼 마르크스, "정치경제학 비판을 위하여" 중원문화 6-, 1988

8 칼 마르크스, "정치경제학 비판 요강 I" 백의 80-83, 2000

9 칼 마르크스, "자본 I~III" 길 2008

10 임화문학예술전집 편찬위원회, "임화문학예술전집 1~5" 소명출판 2009

11 김윤식, "임화 연구" 문학사상사 1989

12 이현식, "임화 문학의 재인식" 소명출판 2004

13 권성우, "임화 문학 연구 3" 소명출판 2012

14 이명원, "임화 문학 연구 3" 소명출판 2012

15 김수이, "임화 문학 연구 2" 소명출판 2011

16 박정선, "언제나 지상은 아름답다-임화 산문선집" 역락 2012

17 김지형, "식민지 이성과 마르크스의 방법-김남천과 임화의 창작방법론 연구" 소명출판 2013

18 이동희, "박영희전집 I~VI" 영남대출판부 1997

19 박현수, "박영희의 초기 행적과 문학 활동" 상허학회 24 : 104-126, 2008

20 김윤식, "박영희 연구" 열음사 1989

21 자크 데리다, "마르크스의 유령들" 그린비 2007

22 정주아, "동지애와 증오애(hurting love)-회월 박영희의 전향선언과 ‘좌파/문학’" 한국현대문학회 (48) : 7-39, 2016

23 김동식, "‘리얼리즘의 승리’와 텍스트의 무의식 - 임화의 「의도와 작품의 낙차와 비평」에 관한 몇 개의 주석" 민족문학사학회 (38) : 94-130, 2008

24 K. Marx, "Marx-Engels Collected Works(MECW) V o l. 48" Lawrence & Wishart 2001

25 칼 마르크스, "1844년의 경제학-철학 수고" 이론과 실천 132-, 1987