RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      정치도감(整治都監) 운영의 제양상에 대한 재검토 = Reviewing several aspects of the Jeongchi Dogam’s reform efforts

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the early 1340s, Yuan dynasty requested a series of reforms to Goryeo, based upon its decades’ old policy which chose to condemn the Muslim ministers’ economic policies, employ a gentler taxation policy, and endeavored to restore order in official appointments while maintaining the government’s size and integrity. Although such policy had indeed gone through some changes over the years, a new Yuan minister named Tokto, particularly interested in reinforcing such policies, came to power in the early 1340s and condemned the ruling of Goryeo King Chunghae-wang, whose policies concentrated upon foreign trades and therefore inflicted considerable pain upon the Goryeo population. To him, Chunghae-wang’s policies were too much reminiscent of the Muslim ministers’.
      So, at the request of the Yuan emperor, the Jeongchi Dogam office was established in the mid-1340s. Despite the fact that Yuan urged them to install such office, Goryeo officials did not resent it and instead fully utilized it in their political and social reform efforts, which turned out to be quite similar to the efforts that had already been attempted by Kings Chungseon-wang and Chungsuk-wang.
      Jeongchi Dogam’s main target was Jeongdong Haengseong. It was originally established as an overseer for the Japanese campaign preparations, yet later Goryeo figures(like Gi Cheol) with intimate connections to Yuan gathered together there and joined forces. They were committing all kinds of economical crimes and abusing their political power. So Jeongchi Dogam tried to eliminate those crimes and abuses. Yet its efforts were blocked, when a relative of Gi Cheol was killed during an interrogation process conducted by the Dogam officers. And with the help of Queen Gi(Gi Cheol’s sister), the Gi family succeeded in neutralizing Jeongchi Dogam. But it should be noted that during all those events Yuan emperor and the government officials maintained its official position supporting Dogam’s reform efforts, and that they remained blatantly indifferent to Haengseong’s apparent plight of being investigated by Dogam. We can see that Yuan government at that point had essentially abandoned Jeongdong Haengseong as a political, administrative entity affiliated to the Yuan government, and the Goryeo office Jeongchi Dogam was in fact ‘authorized’ by Yuan as a legitimate entity to oversee reforms in Goryeo. This progress ultimately enabled King Gongmin-wang to dismantle Haengseong’s Imun-so office, and eliminate the Gi faction once and for all, in 1356.
      번역하기

      In the early 1340s, Yuan dynasty requested a series of reforms to Goryeo, based upon its decades’ old policy which chose to condemn the Muslim ministers’ economic policies, employ a gentler taxation policy, and endeavored to restore order in offic...

      In the early 1340s, Yuan dynasty requested a series of reforms to Goryeo, based upon its decades’ old policy which chose to condemn the Muslim ministers’ economic policies, employ a gentler taxation policy, and endeavored to restore order in official appointments while maintaining the government’s size and integrity. Although such policy had indeed gone through some changes over the years, a new Yuan minister named Tokto, particularly interested in reinforcing such policies, came to power in the early 1340s and condemned the ruling of Goryeo King Chunghae-wang, whose policies concentrated upon foreign trades and therefore inflicted considerable pain upon the Goryeo population. To him, Chunghae-wang’s policies were too much reminiscent of the Muslim ministers’.
      So, at the request of the Yuan emperor, the Jeongchi Dogam office was established in the mid-1340s. Despite the fact that Yuan urged them to install such office, Goryeo officials did not resent it and instead fully utilized it in their political and social reform efforts, which turned out to be quite similar to the efforts that had already been attempted by Kings Chungseon-wang and Chungsuk-wang.
      Jeongchi Dogam’s main target was Jeongdong Haengseong. It was originally established as an overseer for the Japanese campaign preparations, yet later Goryeo figures(like Gi Cheol) with intimate connections to Yuan gathered together there and joined forces. They were committing all kinds of economical crimes and abusing their political power. So Jeongchi Dogam tried to eliminate those crimes and abuses. Yet its efforts were blocked, when a relative of Gi Cheol was killed during an interrogation process conducted by the Dogam officers. And with the help of Queen Gi(Gi Cheol’s sister), the Gi family succeeded in neutralizing Jeongchi Dogam. But it should be noted that during all those events Yuan emperor and the government officials maintained its official position supporting Dogam’s reform efforts, and that they remained blatantly indifferent to Haengseong’s apparent plight of being investigated by Dogam. We can see that Yuan government at that point had essentially abandoned Jeongdong Haengseong as a political, administrative entity affiliated to the Yuan government, and the Goryeo office Jeongchi Dogam was in fact ‘authorized’ by Yuan as a legitimate entity to oversee reforms in Goryeo. This progress ultimately enabled King Gongmin-wang to dismantle Haengseong’s Imun-so office, and eliminate the Gi faction once and for all, in 1356.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 머리말
      • 1. 정치도감 설치의 배경: 원의 ‘정치(整治)’ 권유
      • 2. 정치도감 개혁의 전개: 종래 개혁의 연장
      • 3. 정치도감 개혁의 결과: 공민왕 개혁의 여건 마련
      • 맺음말
      • 머리말
      • 1. 정치도감 설치의 배경: 원의 ‘정치(整治)’ 권유
      • 2. 정치도감 개혁의 전개: 종래 개혁의 연장
      • 3. 정치도감 개혁의 결과: 공민왕 개혁의 여건 마련
      • 맺음말
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 고병익, "麗代 征東行省의 硏究" 14 : 1962

      2 박종기, "원간섭기 사회현실과 개혁론의 전개" 49 : 2003

      3 "고려후기 元 屯田의 운영과 변화" 역사학회 196 : 2007

      4 이익주, "고려말의 정치사회적 혼돈과 신흥사대부의 성장 In: 한국사시민강좌" 일조각 35-, 2004

      5 장동익, "高麗後期外交史硏究" 一潮閣 1994

      6 김인호, "高麗後期 士大夫의 經世論 硏究" 혜안 1999

      7 高惠玲, "高麗後期 士大夫와 性理學 受容" 一潮閣 2001

      8 김용선, "高麗墓誌銘集成" 한림대학교 아시아문화연구소 2001

      9 "高麗史"

      10 이익주, "高麗·元關係의 構造와 高麗後期 政治體制" 서울대학교 1996

      1 고병익, "麗代 征東行省의 硏究" 14 : 1962

      2 박종기, "원간섭기 사회현실과 개혁론의 전개" 49 : 2003

      3 "고려후기 元 屯田의 운영과 변화" 역사학회 196 : 2007

      4 이익주, "고려말의 정치사회적 혼돈과 신흥사대부의 성장 In: 한국사시민강좌" 일조각 35-, 2004

      5 장동익, "高麗後期外交史硏究" 一潮閣 1994

      6 김인호, "高麗後期 士大夫의 經世論 硏究" 혜안 1999

      7 高惠玲, "高麗後期 士大夫와 性理學 受容" 一潮閣 2001

      8 김용선, "高麗墓誌銘集成" 한림대학교 아시아문화연구소 2001

      9 "高麗史"

      10 이익주, "高麗·元關係의 構造와 高麗後期 政治體制" 서울대학교 1996

      11 전병무, "高麗 忠惠王의 商業활동과 財政정책 『역사와현실』10 및 이강한, 2007 『13~14세기 高麗-元 交易의 展開와 性格』, 서울대학교 문학박사학위논문"

      12 민현구, "整治都監의 性格" 23 : 1980

      13 "征東行省官 闊里吉思의 高麗制度 改變 시도" 한국사연구회 139 : 2007

      14 植松正, "彙輯 『至元新格』?ぴに解說" 30 (30):

      15 "元史"

      16 고병익, "元代의 法制 In: 東亞交涉史의 硏究" 서울대학교출판부 1970

      17 "元代性理學 槪觀 In: 元代性理學" 포은사상연구원 1993

      18 김형수, "元 干涉期 高麗의 政治勢力과 政局動向" 경북대학교 2001

      19 田村實造, "世祖と三人の財政家 In: 中國征服王朝史の硏究" 同朋舍出版 1974

      20 김창현, "『高麗後期 政房 硏究』, 고려대학교 민족문화연구원"

      21 "『新元史』 券24 本紀24 惠帝 至元6年(1340) 4月"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼