RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      온라인 정치 담론에서의 극단화 위험 측정 : 유튜브 댓글의 자동 담론 분류와 사건 기반 위험도 분석 = Measuring Radicalization Risk in Online Political Discourse : Automated Discourse Classification and Event-Driven Risk Analysis of YouTube Comments

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110109082

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to quantitatively assess radicalization risk in online political discourse and to examine how such risk intensifies in response to political events. Focusing on videos and comments from the most-subscribed far-right YouTube channel in South Korea, the study proposes an automated analytical framework that integrates functional discourse classification, a behavioral stage scale, and a continuous risk index.
      The results show that the majority of comments fall into the low-risk category, and the average risk level remains relatively low. However, despite this overall stability, a markedly asymmetric risk structure emerges in the upper tail of the distribution. In particular, following the issuance of an arrest warrant for a former president, both the 95th percentile of the risk distribution and the proportion of explicit violent discourse increased sharply on the following day.
      Discourse-level analysis reveals that mobilization-related discourse appears more frequently than explicit violent discourse, while dehumanization and conspiratorial narratives tend to co-occur with mobilization or violence, facilitating escalation to higher-risk stages. In addition, reclassification of symbolic expressions demonstrates that removing non- actionable symbolic-only content reduces false positives without diminishing the detection of genuinely high-risk discourse.
      Overall, the findings suggest that online political radicalization is not characterized by a uniform shift in average discourse intensity, but rather by selective escalation within attitude-aligned groups in response to salient events. This study highlights the importance of tail-focused risk indicators and stage-based analysis for effective assessment of online extremism, offering practical implications for platform governance and policy interventions.
      번역하기

      This study aims to quantitatively assess radicalization risk in online political discourse and to examine how such risk intensifies in response to political events. Focusing on videos and comments from the most-subscribed far-right YouTube channel in ...

      This study aims to quantitatively assess radicalization risk in online political discourse and to examine how such risk intensifies in response to political events. Focusing on videos and comments from the most-subscribed far-right YouTube channel in South Korea, the study proposes an automated analytical framework that integrates functional discourse classification, a behavioral stage scale, and a continuous risk index.
      The results show that the majority of comments fall into the low-risk category, and the average risk level remains relatively low. However, despite this overall stability, a markedly asymmetric risk structure emerges in the upper tail of the distribution. In particular, following the issuance of an arrest warrant for a former president, both the 95th percentile of the risk distribution and the proportion of explicit violent discourse increased sharply on the following day.
      Discourse-level analysis reveals that mobilization-related discourse appears more frequently than explicit violent discourse, while dehumanization and conspiratorial narratives tend to co-occur with mobilization or violence, facilitating escalation to higher-risk stages. In addition, reclassification of symbolic expressions demonstrates that removing non- actionable symbolic-only content reduces false positives without diminishing the detection of genuinely high-risk discourse.
      Overall, the findings suggest that online political radicalization is not characterized by a uniform shift in average discourse intensity, but rather by selective escalation within attitude-aligned groups in response to salient events. This study highlights the importance of tail-focused risk indicators and stage-based analysis for effective assessment of online extremism, offering practical implications for platform governance and policy interventions.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼