RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      대학생 쓰기 교육을 위한 텍스트 특성 비교 -대학생 필자와 전문 필자의 텍스트를 중심으로- = Comparison of the Quality of Texts Written by Students and Experts

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82634376

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was considered to compare the quality of texts written by students with that of experts for college composition. It analyzed the quality of texts of each twenty text of three groups; upper group and lower group of students, and experts group. This study used nine theological Analysis Tools; X1: T-unit numbers, X2: topics of sentence number, X3: whole word numbers, X4: incorrect sentence number/ whole sentence number, X5: cohesive ties number/ whole sentence number, X6: the number of thematic chunks, X7: whole word numbers/ T-unit numbers, X8: T-unit numbers / topics of sentence number, X9 the number of thematic chunks/the number of sentence theme. The result of analysis is as follows: there is no difference upper group and lower groups of students, on the other hand there is a big difference between students and experts. According to the result of Kruskal Walls test and Nonparametric Two-Independent-Sample TEST, there are big differences students and experts in X4: incorrect sentence number/whole sentence number, X6: the number of thematic chunks, X9 : the number of thematic chunks/the number of sentence theme. Experts have no incorrect sentences whereas students have a lot of incorrect sentences. the topic of sentence written by experts are connected consistently each other toward The topics of text, but students show the lack of coherent states in it. Therefore in order to write good texts, students should closely connect topics of sentence toward The topics of text.
      번역하기

      This study was considered to compare the quality of texts written by students with that of experts for college composition. It analyzed the quality of texts of each twenty text of three groups; upper group and lower group of students, and experts grou...

      This study was considered to compare the quality of texts written by students with that of experts for college composition. It analyzed the quality of texts of each twenty text of three groups; upper group and lower group of students, and experts group. This study used nine theological Analysis Tools; X1: T-unit numbers, X2: topics of sentence number, X3: whole word numbers, X4: incorrect sentence number/ whole sentence number, X5: cohesive ties number/ whole sentence number, X6: the number of thematic chunks, X7: whole word numbers/ T-unit numbers, X8: T-unit numbers / topics of sentence number, X9 the number of thematic chunks/the number of sentence theme. The result of analysis is as follows: there is no difference upper group and lower groups of students, on the other hand there is a big difference between students and experts. According to the result of Kruskal Walls test and Nonparametric Two-Independent-Sample TEST, there are big differences students and experts in X4: incorrect sentence number/whole sentence number, X6: the number of thematic chunks, X9 : the number of thematic chunks/the number of sentence theme. Experts have no incorrect sentences whereas students have a lot of incorrect sentences. the topic of sentence written by experts are connected consistently each other toward The topics of text, but students show the lack of coherent states in it. Therefore in order to write good texts, students should closely connect topics of sentence toward The topics of text.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼