RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      타부와 의례 = `이항대립적 사고체계`의 구성과 해체, 그리고 정치적 재구성

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99929088

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Claude Levi-Strauss argued that human cognition, which is based on logical thought, is independent of social context. From this, he proposed that the taboo is a comprehensive and coherent classificatory system enabling individuals to classify the world in a rational fashion. In this judgment, he explained that the taboo is a nominal difference which has a logical validity. Its acceptance amounts to validate the differential attribute between the forbidden and the permitted, in epistemology between one cognizable and another cognizable, and to renounce their mixture. When we abide by the nominal rule, its effectiveness will be maintained. The rule dishonored will be naturally related to the loss or weakening of meaning, even if a punishment is imposed.
      But, in our perspective, the taboo is the epistemological difference involved in the dynamic activity of thought based on the opposition between the sacred and the impure; in other words, between the non-cognizable and the cognizable, which should be defined only in terms of one another. Here, in dignity and power and as a source of inspiration and identity, the sacred is superior to the impure. It is therefore directly related to the discriminative judgment.
      In this condition, it is necessary to understand that violation the taboo is usually not considered to be a loss or weakening of its significance, because an intentional defiance, what we said as a ritual violation, is inherent in the system itself of taboo. The efficiency of taboo is fundamentally based on the existence of the inevitable violation. Actually, if the entire member does not attend in the ritual, the ritual violation will reproduce a discriminative structure between the attendants and the non-attendants.
      번역하기

      Claude Levi-Strauss argued that human cognition, which is based on logical thought, is independent of social context. From this, he proposed that the taboo is a comprehensive and coherent classificatory system enabling individuals to classify the worl...

      Claude Levi-Strauss argued that human cognition, which is based on logical thought, is independent of social context. From this, he proposed that the taboo is a comprehensive and coherent classificatory system enabling individuals to classify the world in a rational fashion. In this judgment, he explained that the taboo is a nominal difference which has a logical validity. Its acceptance amounts to validate the differential attribute between the forbidden and the permitted, in epistemology between one cognizable and another cognizable, and to renounce their mixture. When we abide by the nominal rule, its effectiveness will be maintained. The rule dishonored will be naturally related to the loss or weakening of meaning, even if a punishment is imposed.
      But, in our perspective, the taboo is the epistemological difference involved in the dynamic activity of thought based on the opposition between the sacred and the impure; in other words, between the non-cognizable and the cognizable, which should be defined only in terms of one another. Here, in dignity and power and as a source of inspiration and identity, the sacred is superior to the impure. It is therefore directly related to the discriminative judgment.
      In this condition, it is necessary to understand that violation the taboo is usually not considered to be a loss or weakening of its significance, because an intentional defiance, what we said as a ritual violation, is inherent in the system itself of taboo. The efficiency of taboo is fundamentally based on the existence of the inevitable violation. Actually, if the entire member does not attend in the ritual, the ritual violation will reproduce a discriminative structure between the attendants and the non-attendants.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김기현, "현대 인식론" 민음사 2003

      2 Vries, Josef de, "인식의 근본 문제(1980)" 가톨릭출판사 2007

      3 Rovighi, V. Sofia, "인식론의 역사" 가톨릭대학교출판부 2004

      4 Eliade, Mircea, "성과 속(1957)" 한길사 1998

      5 김성례, "무교 신화와 의례의 신성성과 연행성" 10 : 1997

      6 강진옥, "‘신성과의 소통방식’을 통해 본 무속의례와 신화의 공간성 연구" 비교민속학회 39 (39): 387-438, 2009

      7 Coppet, Daniel de, "tabou, In Encyclopaedia Universalis" CORPUS 2002

      8 Lévi-Strauss,Claude, "Totémisme aujourd'hui" PUF 1962

      9 Freud, Sigmund, "Totem et Tabou(1913), trad. fr. par Serge Jankélévitch" Petite Bibliothèque Payot 1965

      10 Turner, Victor, "The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure" Aldine de Gruyter 1969

      1 김기현, "현대 인식론" 민음사 2003

      2 Vries, Josef de, "인식의 근본 문제(1980)" 가톨릭출판사 2007

      3 Rovighi, V. Sofia, "인식론의 역사" 가톨릭대학교출판부 2004

      4 Eliade, Mircea, "성과 속(1957)" 한길사 1998

      5 김성례, "무교 신화와 의례의 신성성과 연행성" 10 : 1997

      6 강진옥, "‘신성과의 소통방식’을 통해 본 무속의례와 신화의 공간성 연구" 비교민속학회 39 (39): 387-438, 2009

      7 Coppet, Daniel de, "tabou, In Encyclopaedia Universalis" CORPUS 2002

      8 Lévi-Strauss,Claude, "Totémisme aujourd'hui" PUF 1962

      9 Freud, Sigmund, "Totem et Tabou(1913), trad. fr. par Serge Jankélévitch" Petite Bibliothèque Payot 1965

      10 Turner, Victor, "The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure" Aldine de Gruyter 1969

      11 Bonte, Pierre, "Tabou, In Dictionnaire de l’ethnologie et de l’anthropologie" Paris: PUF 1991

      12 Steiner, Franz, "Taboo" Routledge 1956

      13 Bastide, Roger, "Sociologie et Psychanalyse" PUF 1950

      14 Kilani, Mondher, "Sacré, In Le Dictionnaire des Sciences humaines" PUF 2006

      15 Douglas, Mary, "Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1966

      16 Cuisenier, Jean, "Penser le rituel" PUF 2006

      17 Caillois, Roger, "L’homme et le sacré" Gallimard 1939

      18 Dubuisson, Daniel, "L’Occident et la religion : mythes, science et idéologie" Éditions Complexe 1998

      19 Cazeneuve,Jean, "Les rites et la condition humaine" PUF 1958

      20 Durkheim, Émile, "Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse : le système totémique en Australie(1912)" PUF 1960

      21 Ries, Julien, "Les chemins du sacré dans l’histoire" Aubier 1985

      22 Lévi-Strauss, Claude, "Les Structures élémentaires de la parenté(1949)" Mouton & Co 1967

      23 Masson, Michel, "Le sacré en Chine" BREPOLS 2008

      24 Jankélévitch, Vladimir, "Le pur et l’impur, In Philosophie morale(1960)" Flammarion 1998

      25 Parrinder,Geoffrey, "Le Sexe dans les religions du monde" Le Centurion 1980

      26 Frazer, James Georges, "Le Rameau d’Or (The Golden Bough), t. I : Le Roi magicien dans la société primitive" Robert Laffont 1981

      27 Maranda, P, "Le Crâne et l’Utérus : Deux Théorèmes Nord-Malaitains, In Échanges et Communications, Hommages offerts à Claude Lévi-Strauss pour son 60e anniversaire" Mouton 1970

      28 Lévi-Strauss,Claude, "La pensée sauvage" Plon 1962

      29 Lombard, Jacques, "La peine et la répression, In Histoire des Mœurs II" Gallimard 1991

      30 Calame-Griaule, Geneviève, "La parole et le discours, In Histoire des Mœurs II" Gallimard 1991

      31 Rabant, Claude, "Interdit, In Encyclopaedia Universalis" CORPUS 2002

      32 André, Jacques, "Incestes" PUF 2001

      33 Laplanche, Jean, "Inceste, In Vocabulaire de la Psychanalyse" PUF 1998

      34 Durkheim,Émile, "De la définition des phénomènes religieux L’Année sociologique, 1897-1898" PUF 1969

      35 Durkheim,Émile, "Cours sur les origines de la vie religieuse, L’Année sociologique, 1897-1898" PUF 1969

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.46 0.46 0.44
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.42 0.801 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼