RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    헤겔의 『정신현상학』에 비추어 본 마음과 교육 = Mind and Education from the Viewpoint of Hegel`s Phenomenology of Spirit

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82566591

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to exhibit the theory of mind implicit in Hegel`s Phenomenology of Spirit, and explore how it can be interpreted as an educational theory. For this purpose, this study raises Kant`s transcendental philosophy and Hegel`s Phenomenology of Spirit as two perspectives on mind and knowledge, and compares them. In this comparison, Hegel`s mind theory subsumes the very modes of mind presented by Kant`s mind theory, into the process of education(Bildung) as self-knowing activity: Kant`s theory argues that all modes of mind presuppose Reason`s Idea as an a priori condition, whereas Hegel`s theory elucidates that they are the positive manifestations of universal Reason`s own, i.e., Spirit`s self-manifestations in the sequence of development of Consciousness. And by distinguishing empirical cognition from the process of education and fixing it as an objective fact, Kant justifies it as an objective knowing, but leaves Reason`s Idea as the unknowable beyond it. On the other hand, by returning it into its original state, i.e., the process of education, Hegel exhibits that its true identity is the turning point of universal Reason`s conceptual thinking, and that education is the self-knowing activity in which Reason thinks conceptually all the modes of mind and all the ideas of knowledge which it produced in its Consciousness days, and then knows them as its own actual manifestations, i.e., Spirit`s self-manifestations. So, in Spirit`s view, education is the self-sufficient activity which purpose is to know the meaning of education as such. The process of education is the process of self-recollection in which Spirit manifests itself as the sequential modes of Consciousness and the other-beings, subsumes them into itself, and then returns into itself as self-conscious Spirit. In conclusion, this ``metaphysical`` or ``substantial`` aspect of Hegel`` mind theory is a warning to nowadays` common notions that relegate education to a kind of temporary activity of delivering pre-established ideas, thereby treating it as an indifferent object to oneself, especially adult`s own self.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to exhibit the theory of mind implicit in Hegel`s Phenomenology of Spirit, and explore how it can be interpreted as an educational theory. For this purpose, this study raises Kant`s transcendental philosophy and Hegel`s Ph...

    The purpose of this study is to exhibit the theory of mind implicit in Hegel`s Phenomenology of Spirit, and explore how it can be interpreted as an educational theory. For this purpose, this study raises Kant`s transcendental philosophy and Hegel`s Phenomenology of Spirit as two perspectives on mind and knowledge, and compares them. In this comparison, Hegel`s mind theory subsumes the very modes of mind presented by Kant`s mind theory, into the process of education(Bildung) as self-knowing activity: Kant`s theory argues that all modes of mind presuppose Reason`s Idea as an a priori condition, whereas Hegel`s theory elucidates that they are the positive manifestations of universal Reason`s own, i.e., Spirit`s self-manifestations in the sequence of development of Consciousness. And by distinguishing empirical cognition from the process of education and fixing it as an objective fact, Kant justifies it as an objective knowing, but leaves Reason`s Idea as the unknowable beyond it. On the other hand, by returning it into its original state, i.e., the process of education, Hegel exhibits that its true identity is the turning point of universal Reason`s conceptual thinking, and that education is the self-knowing activity in which Reason thinks conceptually all the modes of mind and all the ideas of knowledge which it produced in its Consciousness days, and then knows them as its own actual manifestations, i.e., Spirit`s self-manifestations. So, in Spirit`s view, education is the self-sufficient activity which purpose is to know the meaning of education as such. The process of education is the process of self-recollection in which Spirit manifests itself as the sequential modes of Consciousness and the other-beings, subsumes them into itself, and then returns into itself as self-conscious Spirit. In conclusion, this ``metaphysical`` or ``substantial`` aspect of Hegel`` mind theory is a warning to nowadays` common notions that relegate education to a kind of temporary activity of delivering pre-established ideas, thereby treating it as an indifferent object to oneself, especially adult`s own self.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이홍우, "형식도야이론의 매력과 함정. in: 증보 교육과정탐구" 박영사 357-380, 1992

    2 고영준, "헤겔 「정신현상학」에 비추어 본 교과교육의 의미와 정당성" 한국도덕교육학회 20 (20): 259-279, 2009

    3 고영준, "학문과 교과: 헤겔 「정신현상학」의 교육학적 해석" 서울대학교 2008

    4 임석진, "피히테와 셸링 철학체계의 차이" 지식산업사 1989

    5 서동익, "철학강요" 을유문화사 1983

    6 임석진, "정신현상학 1, 2" 한길사

    7 박병기, "정신철학" 울산대학교 출판부 2000

    8 Kant, I, "순수이성비판" 박영사 1983

    9 황설중, "믿음과 지식" 아카넷 2003

    10 Miller, A. V, "대논리학 I, II, III" 지학사 1983

    1 이홍우, "형식도야이론의 매력과 함정. in: 증보 교육과정탐구" 박영사 357-380, 1992

    2 고영준, "헤겔 「정신현상학」에 비추어 본 교과교육의 의미와 정당성" 한국도덕교육학회 20 (20): 259-279, 2009

    3 고영준, "학문과 교과: 헤겔 「정신현상학」의 교육학적 해석" 서울대학교 2008

    4 임석진, "피히테와 셸링 철학체계의 차이" 지식산업사 1989

    5 서동익, "철학강요" 을유문화사 1983

    6 임석진, "정신현상학 1, 2" 한길사

    7 박병기, "정신철학" 울산대학교 출판부 2000

    8 Kant, I, "순수이성비판" 박영사 1983

    9 황설중, "믿음과 지식" 아카넷 2003

    10 Miller, A. V, "대논리학 I, II, III" 지학사 1983

    11 Hegel, G. W. F, "Wissenschaft der Logik" 5-6 : 1970

    12 Talyor, C, "The Opening Arguments of the Phenomenology. in: Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays" University of Notre Dame Press 151-187, 1972

    13 Hamlyn, D. W, "The Logical and Psychological Aspects of Learning. in: The Concept of Education" Routledge & Kegan Paul 24-43, 1967

    14 Harris, H. S, "The Difference between Fichte's and Schelling's System of Philosophy" State University of New York Press 1977

    15 Hegel, G. W. F, "Phänomenologie des Geistes" 3 : 1970

    16 Miller, A. V, "Phenomenology of Spirit" Oxford University Press 1977

    17 Oakeshott, M, "Leaning and Teaching. in: The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education" 43-65, 1989

    18 Solomon, R. C, "In the Spirit of Hegel" Oxford Unversity Press 1983

    19 Hamlyn, D. W, "Human Learning. in: the Philosophy of Education" Oxford University Press 178-194, 1973

    20 Kaufmann, W, "Hegel: Texts and Commentary" Doubleday 1977

    21 Miller, A. V, "Hegel's Philosophy of Mind" Oxford University Press 1971

    22 Maker, W, "Hegel's Phenomenology as Introduction to Science. in: G. W. R. Hegel: Critical Assessments III" Routledge 78-92, 1993

    23 Pippin, R. B, "Hegel's Phenomenological Criticism. in: G. W. F. Hegel: Critical Assessments III" Routledge 39-56, 1993

    24 Wallace, W, "Hegel's Logic. with foreword" Oxford University Press 1975

    25 Mackenzie, H. M, "Hegel's Educational Theory and Practice" Greenwood Publishing Group 1970

    26 Hegel, G. W. F, "Glauben und Wissen oder Reflexionsphiloshphie der Subjektivität in der Vollständigkeit ihrer Formen als Kanntische, Jacobische und Fichtesche Philosophie. Jenar Shcriften 1801-1807" 2 : 287-433, 1970

    27 Cerf, W, "Faith & Knowledge" State University of New York Press 1977

    28 Hegel, G. W. F, "Enzyklopädie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften in Grundrisse" 8-10 : 1970

    29 Hegel, G. W. F, "Differenz des Fichteshen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie. Jenar Shcriften 1801-1807" 2 : 9-138, 1970

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : 교육철학 -> 교육철학연구 KCI등재
    2011-03-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 교육철학회 -> 한국교육철학학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Philosophy of Education Society
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Philosophy of Education Society -> The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.86
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.88 1.27 0.33
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼