RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국 주요 기업의 지배구조 운용 현황 검토 = A Study and Survey Research on the Current Situation of the U.S. Corporate Governance System

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99915783

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A draft of a proposed Korean Commercial Code of 2013 included ① mandatory regulations of corporate executive officers system, ② phased obligation of the cumulative voting, when election of director, ③ separate election of the Audit Committee of the Board, ④ introduction of the electronic ballot system, ⑤ compulsory regulations of multiple derivative suits. As National Assembly passes the draft, significant changes of Korean corporate governance systems are expected.
    Korean corporate governance systems of corporate law have been seriously affected by U.S. systems. Thus, it is important to review for U.S. corporate governance regime and its present conditions of actual systems. This paper researched and surveyed for the current situation of the U.S. corporate governance system by giving specific examples, concretely, which is the systems of principal public held corporations such as Walmart, Exxon Mobil, Apple, JPMorgan & Chase, General Electric, Chevron, Berkshire Hathaway, AT&T, Ford Motor, and IBM.
    In conclusion, the time is not yet ripe for the mandatory regulations of corporate executive officers system, the obligation of the cumulative voting, and separate election of the Audit Committee members under the draft in view of facts that American corporate governance legal systems of actual examples give companies greater autonomy in their own systems. It is the time when we should study and ponder this trend of American legal system with great interest.
    번역하기

    A draft of a proposed Korean Commercial Code of 2013 included ① mandatory regulations of corporate executive officers system, ② phased obligation of the cumulative voting, when election of director, ③ separate election of the Audit Committee of ...

    A draft of a proposed Korean Commercial Code of 2013 included ① mandatory regulations of corporate executive officers system, ② phased obligation of the cumulative voting, when election of director, ③ separate election of the Audit Committee of the Board, ④ introduction of the electronic ballot system, ⑤ compulsory regulations of multiple derivative suits. As National Assembly passes the draft, significant changes of Korean corporate governance systems are expected.
    Korean corporate governance systems of corporate law have been seriously affected by U.S. systems. Thus, it is important to review for U.S. corporate governance regime and its present conditions of actual systems. This paper researched and surveyed for the current situation of the U.S. corporate governance system by giving specific examples, concretely, which is the systems of principal public held corporations such as Walmart, Exxon Mobil, Apple, JPMorgan & Chase, General Electric, Chevron, Berkshire Hathaway, AT&T, Ford Motor, and IBM.
    In conclusion, the time is not yet ripe for the mandatory regulations of corporate executive officers system, the obligation of the cumulative voting, and separate election of the Audit Committee members under the draft in view of facts that American corporate governance legal systems of actual examples give companies greater autonomy in their own systems. It is the time when we should study and ponder this trend of American legal system with great interest.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 미국형 기업지배구조론과 관련 문제들
    • Ⅲ. 미국 주요 기업의 지배구조 현황 분석
    • Ⅳ. 결어 - 시사점에 갈음하여
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 미국형 기업지배구조론과 관련 문제들
    • Ⅲ. 미국 주요 기업의 지배구조 현황 분석
    • Ⅳ. 결어 - 시사점에 갈음하여
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Murray L. Weidenbaum, Transactions Pub. 1967

    2 John W. Pratt, Harvard Business School Press 55-56, 1991

    3 권종호, "바람직한 기업지배구조 관련 상법개정 방안" 15-, 2013

    4 임재연, "미국기업법" 박영사 407-, 2009

    5 정경영, "독립적 사외이사, 집중투표" 5-, 2013

    6 권종호, "기업지배구조의 획일화 - 집행임원제도의 도입의무화에 관한 상법개정안을 보고 -" 한국기업법학회 27 (27): 247-271, 2013

    7 "http://www.ge.com/investor-relations/governance/board-of-directors"

    8 "http://www.fortune500-app.com/"

    9 "http://www.forbes.com/global2000"

    10 "United States v. Bernard J. Ebbers, 458 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)"

    1 Murray L. Weidenbaum, Transactions Pub. 1967

    2 John W. Pratt, Harvard Business School Press 55-56, 1991

    3 권종호, "바람직한 기업지배구조 관련 상법개정 방안" 15-, 2013

    4 임재연, "미국기업법" 박영사 407-, 2009

    5 정경영, "독립적 사외이사, 집중투표" 5-, 2013

    6 권종호, "기업지배구조의 획일화 - 집행임원제도의 도입의무화에 관한 상법개정안을 보고 -" 한국기업법학회 27 (27): 247-271, 2013

    7 "http://www.ge.com/investor-relations/governance/board-of-directors"

    8 "http://www.fortune500-app.com/"

    9 "http://www.forbes.com/global2000"

    10 "United States v. Bernard J. Ebbers, 458 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)"

    11 Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., "The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business" Harvard University Press 1977

    12 Melvin A. Eisenberg, "The Structure of Corporation Law" 89 : 1461-, 1989

    13 Gordon Smith, "The Shareholder Primacy Norm" 23 : 277-277, 1998

    14 William W. Bratton, "The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History" 41 : 1471-1476, 1989

    15 Harold Koontz, "The Management Theory Jungle" 4 : 174-178, 1961

    16 Rudolph E. Uhlman, "The Legal Status of Corporate Directors" 19 : 12-13, 1939

    17 Henry Hansmann, "The End of History for Corporate Law" 89 : 439-442, 2001

    18 Frank Easterbrook, "The Economic Structure of Corporate Law" Harvard University Press 5-, 1996

    19 Lissa L. Broome, "The Corporate Boardroom: Still a Male Club" 33 : 665-, 2008

    20 Luca Enriques, "The Basic Governance Structure: The Interests of Shareholder as a Class, in the Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach" Oxford University Press 55-64, 2009

    21 "Shields v. Cape Fox Corp., 42 P.3d 1083 (Alaska 2002)"

    22 Louis Loss, "Securities Regulation" Aspen Pub. 716-, 2001

    23 "Restatement (Second) of Agency § 14C (1958)"

    24 Dennis R. Beresford, "Report of Investigation by The Special Investigative Committee of the Board of Directors of Worldcom, Inc."

    25 Lyman P. Q. Johnson, "Recalling Why Corporate Officers Are Fiduciaries" 46 : 1597-1605, 2005

    26 "Potter v. Pohlad, 560 N.W.2d 389, 394 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997)"

    27 "Pinnacle Labs, LLC v. Goldberg, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65620 (W.D. Wis. 2007)"

    28 Michael Rowlinson, "Marxist Political Economy, Revolutionary Politics, and Labor Process Theory" 30 : 85-88, 2000

    29 "Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Northeast Concrete Prods., LLC, 756 N.W.2d 93"

    30 Harry G. Henn, "Laws of Corporations and Other Business Enterprises" West 135-, 2002

    31 William W. Bratton, "Incomplete Contracts Theories of the Firm and Comparative Corporate Governance" 2 : 745-747, 2001

    32 William W. Bratton, "Incomplete Contracts Theories of the Firm and Comparative Corporate Governance" 2 : 745-747, 2001

    33 Roberta S. Karmel, "Implications of the Stakeholder Model" 61 : 1156-1163, 1993

    34 Thomas F. McInerney, "Implications of High Performance Production and Work Practices for Theory of the Firm and Corporate Governance" 2004 : 135-167, 2004

    35 "Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 166 Cal. App. 4th 1438 (Cal. App. 2008)"

    36 "Goodwin v. Hobza, 17 Neb. Ct. App. 353"

    37 Arthur R. Pinto, "Globalization and the Study of Comparative Corporate Governance" 23 : 477-484, 2005

    38 Allen Kaufman, "From Trust to Contract: The Legal Language of Managerial Ideology, 1920-1980" 66 : 523-530, 1992

    39 "ExxonMobil's Corporate Governance Guidelines, as amended on October 29"

    40 "ExxonMobil's Audit Committee Charter, as revised on April 27"

    41 Kathleen F. Brickey, "Enron's Legacy" 8 : 221-, 2004

    42 Richard A. Posner, "Economic Analysis of Law" Aspen Pub. 441-, 2007

    43 Myles L. G. Mace, "Directors: Myth and Reality" Harvard Univ. Press 208-, 1986

    44 Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance" 97 : 547-, 2003

    45 Melvin A. Eisenberg, "Corporations and Other Business Organizations" West 204-, 2000

    46 James D. Cox, "Corporations" Aspen Pub. 117-, 2003

    47 Adam Winkler, "Corporate Law or the Law of Business?: Stakeholders and Corporate Governance at the End of History" (Autumn) : 109-110, 2004

    48 Robert A. G. Monks, "Corporate Governance" Wiley 223-, 2008

    49 Richard S. F. Eells, "Conceptual Foundations of Business" Homewood 120-, 1974

    50 "Certificate of Incorporation of Exxon Mobil, as amended effective June 20"

    51 "Bylers Alaska Wilderness Adventures Inc. v. City of Kodiak, 197 P.3d 199 (Alaska 2008)"

    52 "Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc., 77 P.3d 130 (Kan. 2003)"

    53 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, "Audit Committee Charter, amended on April 12"

    54 "Arnold v. Soc'y for Sav. Bancorp, Inc., 678 A.2d 533 (Del. 1996)"

    55 IBM, "Annual Report"

    56 Edward B. Rock, "America's Shifting Fascination with Comparative Corporate Governance" 74 : 367-369, 1996

    57 Donald C. Langevoort, "Agency Law Inside the Corporation: Problems of Candor and Knowledge" 71 : 1187-1191, 2003

    58 Margaret M. Blair, "A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law" 85 : 247-252, 1999

    59 "2012 Form 10-K, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc."

    60 Ford Motor Company, "2012 Annual Report" Ford Motor Company 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
    2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
    영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
    KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼