RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    韓半島 居住 日本人의 歸還 後 團體 結成과 財産權 補償 要求

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104956162

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper intends to investigate how the Japanese Relief Society for Repatriates was organized in Tokyo and worked for compensation of property left in Korean peninsula. And this flashes over how its claim was reflected in Korea-Japan negotiations for normalization of the diplomatic relations and in Japanese government’s post-war readjustment for her nationals. The problem of repatriates’ property which was the most important task to solve in their association carried over into breakdown of first meeting for Korea-Japan negotiations because Korea couldn’t accept Japan’s insistence as an audacious claim for rights of the post colonizers.
    The Japanese Relief Society for Repatriates started in March 1946 and ended in April of the next year. As a point of view in the staffs and supporting services for unrepatriated, we can regard it as a follow-up organization of Sewakai established in Korea soon after the Japan’s defeat. But we can also consider it as a new type of organization contrary to one in Korea, in light of its activities for repatriated towards Japanese government. We can look upon the association as the first one to request repatriates’ individual claim rights in the Japanese society in the postwar period.
    The claim rights of Japanese repatriates were subject to lapse by San Fransisco Peace Treaty by which Japan’s postwar independence was recognized in the world. To loosen repatriates’ frustration sprang from the treaty, Japanese government enacted the laws to disburse compensation funds for them in 1957 and 1967. But she has never been admitting her liability for reparation in law on the ground that repatriates’ rights were dissipated by measures of Allied Powers in occupied period. And she implemented the strategy in negotiations with Korean government in 1950’s to offset the Japanese property in Korea by Korean property in Japan using the stance of America as a shield, that is, Korea should consider the rights of Japanese repatriates when arguing the claim.
    번역하기

    This paper intends to investigate how the Japanese Relief Society for Repatriates was organized in Tokyo and worked for compensation of property left in Korean peninsula. And this flashes over how its claim was reflected in Korea-Japan negotiations fo...

    This paper intends to investigate how the Japanese Relief Society for Repatriates was organized in Tokyo and worked for compensation of property left in Korean peninsula. And this flashes over how its claim was reflected in Korea-Japan negotiations for normalization of the diplomatic relations and in Japanese government’s post-war readjustment for her nationals. The problem of repatriates’ property which was the most important task to solve in their association carried over into breakdown of first meeting for Korea-Japan negotiations because Korea couldn’t accept Japan’s insistence as an audacious claim for rights of the post colonizers.
    The Japanese Relief Society for Repatriates started in March 1946 and ended in April of the next year. As a point of view in the staffs and supporting services for unrepatriated, we can regard it as a follow-up organization of Sewakai established in Korea soon after the Japan’s defeat. But we can also consider it as a new type of organization contrary to one in Korea, in light of its activities for repatriated towards Japanese government. We can look upon the association as the first one to request repatriates’ individual claim rights in the Japanese society in the postwar period.
    The claim rights of Japanese repatriates were subject to lapse by San Fransisco Peace Treaty by which Japan’s postwar independence was recognized in the world. To loosen repatriates’ frustration sprang from the treaty, Japanese government enacted the laws to disburse compensation funds for them in 1957 and 1967. But she has never been admitting her liability for reparation in law on the ground that repatriates’ rights were dissipated by measures of Allied Powers in occupied period. And she implemented the strategy in negotiations with Korean government in 1950’s to offset the Japanese property in Korea by Korean property in Japan using the stance of America as a shield, that is, Korea should consider the rights of Japanese repatriates when arguing the claim.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    本研究は、韓半島から引揚た日本人が日本でどのような利益団体を作り、韓半島に残してきた財産に対する補償のために、どのような運動を展開してきたか、そして彼らの個人財産権の問題が韓日会談の請求権交渉と日本政府の自国民への戦後処理政策においてどのように扱われたか、を実証するものである。海外に残してきた財産の問題は、日本人引揚者の最も切実な関心事であり、ひいては韓日会談第一次会談を決裂させた'逆請求権'主張に繋がる問題であった。1946年3月結成され1947年4月まで活動した、朝鮮引揚同胞世話会は、役員の構成や引揚者援護活動の面においては、韓半島の世話会の延長線で存在した団体である。しかし、日本政府を相手にした権益保護活動の面においては、韓半島の世話会とは異なる、新しい形態の利益団体でもあった。いわゆる韓半島出身の引揚者のために戦後処理問題の解決を要求する、最初の団体だったのである。サンフランシスコ講和条約の締結によって、日本人引揚者の個人請求権は消滅された。ただこの問題を補う形で、日本政府は1957年と1967年に引揚者への支援のための法律を制定し、法律的に補償の義務はないとしながらも、戦後処理というべく補償に準じる金額を支給した。今日に至るまで引揚者の個人請求権は、講和条約によって連合国の措置により済んだものと看做されている。また、韓国との国交正常化交渉においては、韓国の対日請求権要求には在韓日本人財産の問題を考慮しなければならないという米国の見解を盾にし、日本政府は在韓日本人財産と在日朝鮮人財産を相殺する、方針を貫いてきた。
    번역하기

    本研究は、韓半島から引揚た日本人が日本でどのような利益団体を作り、韓半島に残してきた財産に対する補償のために、どのような運動を展開してきたか、そして彼らの個人財産権の...

    本研究は、韓半島から引揚た日本人が日本でどのような利益団体を作り、韓半島に残してきた財産に対する補償のために、どのような運動を展開してきたか、そして彼らの個人財産権の問題が韓日会談の請求権交渉と日本政府の自国民への戦後処理政策においてどのように扱われたか、を実証するものである。海外に残してきた財産の問題は、日本人引揚者の最も切実な関心事であり、ひいては韓日会談第一次会談を決裂させた'逆請求権'主張に繋がる問題であった。1946年3月結成され1947年4月まで活動した、朝鮮引揚同胞世話会は、役員の構成や引揚者援護活動の面においては、韓半島の世話会の延長線で存在した団体である。しかし、日本政府を相手にした権益保護活動の面においては、韓半島の世話会とは異なる、新しい形態の利益団体でもあった。いわゆる韓半島出身の引揚者のために戦後処理問題の解決を要求する、最初の団体だったのである。サンフランシスコ講和条約の締結によって、日本人引揚者の個人請求権は消滅された。ただこの問題を補う形で、日本政府は1957年と1967年に引揚者への支援のための法律を制定し、法律的に補償の義務はないとしながらも、戦後処理というべく補償に準じる金額を支給した。今日に至るまで引揚者の個人請求権は、講和条約によって連合国の措置により済んだものと看做されている。また、韓国との国交正常化交渉においては、韓国の対日請求権要求には在韓日本人財産の問題を考慮しなければならないという米国の見解を盾にし、日本政府は在韓日本人財産と在日朝鮮人財産を相殺する、方針を貫いてきた。

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 (11) : 1-, 1947

    2 (14) : 3-4, 1947

    3 水田直昌, "落葉籠"

    4 최영호, "현대한일관계사" 국학자료원 91-92, 2002

    5 최영호, "해방직후의 일본인 귀환: 세화회 활동을 중심으로" 선인 62-63, 2010

    6 한국학중앙연구원, "해방직후 한국소재 일본인 자산 관련자료" 선인 ⅷ-, 2005

    7 박진희, "한일회담: 제1공화국의 대일정책과 한일회담 전개과정" 선인 178-187, 2008

    8 국민대학교일본학연구소, "한일회담 일본외교문서 목록집" 선인 2010

    9 "한일회담 외교문서 in 제1차 한일회담 청구권분과위원회회의록 제1~8차(1952년 2월 20일~4월 1일)" 364-, 1952

    10 이동준, "한일청구권교섭과 ‘미국해석’: 회담 ‘공백기’를 중심으로"

    1 (11) : 1-, 1947

    2 (14) : 3-4, 1947

    3 水田直昌, "落葉籠"

    4 최영호, "현대한일관계사" 국학자료원 91-92, 2002

    5 최영호, "해방직후의 일본인 귀환: 세화회 활동을 중심으로" 선인 62-63, 2010

    6 한국학중앙연구원, "해방직후 한국소재 일본인 자산 관련자료" 선인 ⅷ-, 2005

    7 박진희, "한일회담: 제1공화국의 대일정책과 한일회담 전개과정" 선인 178-187, 2008

    8 국민대학교일본학연구소, "한일회담 일본외교문서 목록집" 선인 2010

    9 "한일회담 외교문서 in 제1차 한일회담 청구권분과위원회회의록 제1~8차(1952년 2월 20일~4월 1일)" 364-, 1952

    10 이동준, "한일청구권교섭과 ‘미국해석’: 회담 ‘공백기’를 중심으로"

    11 이원덕, "한일과거사 처리의 원점: 일본의 전후처리 외교와 한일회담" 79-100,

    12 이원덕, "한일 과거사 처리의 원점: 일본의 전후처리 외교와 한일회담" 서울대학교출판부 51-58, 1996

    13 최영호, "한반도 거주 일본인의 패전 직후 단체 활동" 17 : 78-89, 2010

    14 최영호, "한반도 거주 일본인의 귀환과정에서 나타난 식민지 지배에 관한 인식" 동북아역사재단 (21) : 263-303, 2008

    15 정병욱, "조선총독부관료의 일본 귀환 후 활동과 한일교섭-1950, 60년대 동화협회·중앙일한협회를 중심으로-" (14) : 2005

    16 이형식, "조선총독부 관료들의 식민지 지배 경험" 2010

    17 외무부정무국아주과, "제6차 한일회담 일반청구권소위원회 제7차회의회의록(1961년 12월 15일)" 218-248, 1961

    18 이연식, "전후 해외 귀환자에 대한 한일 양국의 지원법 비교연구: 입범의 역사적 배경과 성격을 중심으로, In 근현대 한일관계의 제문제" 동북아역사재단 136-144, 2010

    19 김경남, "재조선 일본인들의 귀환과 전후의 한국 인식" 동북아역사재단 (21) : 305-359, 2008

    20 아사노 도요미, "식민지의 물리적 청산과 심리적 청산: 청구권의 법적 문맥과 정치적 해결 in 한일회담과 국제사회" 국민대학교일본학연구소 2010

    21 盧琦霙, "解放 後 日本人의 歸還과 中央日韓協會" 한일민족문제학회 (10) : 125-160, 2006

    22 厚生省援護局, "続々引揚援護の記錄" 417-, 1963

    23 森田芳夫, "朝鮮終戦の記錄: 資料編第二巻" 巖南堂 1980

    24 森田芳夫, "朝鮮終戦の記錄: 米ソ両軍の進駐と日本人の引揚" 巖南堂 1964

    25 秋山昌平, "朝鮮引揚同胞世話会: どんな団体で、何をするか" 1 (1): 22-,

    26 浅野豊美, "日韓国交正常化問題資料: 第1期1945~1953年<請求権問題>" 現代史料出版 2010

    27 若槻泰雄, "戦後引揚げの記錄" 時事通信社 46-, 1991

    28 小林英夫, "戦後アジアにおける日本人団体の活動と特徴 , 小林英夫·柴田善雅·吉田千之輔, 戦後アジアにおける日本人団体: 引揚げから企業進出まで" ゆまに書房 2008

    29 柴田善雅, "引揚者経済団体の活動と在外財産補償要求" ゆまに書房 2008

    30 関屋貞三郎, "引揚同胞にうつたふ" 1 (1): 2-,

    31 "引揚同胞"

    32 宣在源, "引揚企業団体の活動: 戦前期海外進出企業の国内経済復帰過程" 東京大学出版会 481-492, 2002

    33 朝鮮引揚同胞世話會, "在朝鮮日本人個人財産額調" 朝鮮引揚同胞世話會 1947

    34 大藏省令第, "在外財産等ノ報告ニ關スル大藏省令" 大藏省外資局 1945

    35 内閣総理大臣官房管理室, "在外財産問題の処理記録: 引揚者特別交付金の支給" 内閣総理大臣官房管理室 70-71, 1973

    36 穗積眞六郞外四名, "在外個人財産報償に關する陳情"

    37 "同和"

    38 朝鮮引揚同胞世話會, "事業槪況"

    39 "フリー百科事典, ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)"

    40 吳圭祥, "ドキュメント在日本朝鮮人連盟 1945~1949" 岩波書店 317-318, 2009

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.85 0.85 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.66 0.61 1.461 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼