RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    한국의 사회 · 문화 · 제도 속에서의 여성의 무력화와 세력화(Empowerment) 전략 = Empowerment Strategies for Women in Korean Culture

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104175884

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this paper, we'd like to argue that the power of women has been weakened by means of society and social institution in Korean culture. First of all, we reviewed how the power has been conceptualized in academic society compared feminists' viewpoint on power. The concept of power has been studied as a thing, which is objectified and decontextualized, and treated as a psychological attribute possessed by a person. The powerful person is always a normal, male, capitalist, and dominant class. In addition, those individuals have the power to control the abnormal, female, laborer, and subordinate class. However, feminists argued that the notion of power has to be conceptualized from the viewpoint of social and cultural context. That is, the power as capacity or potentials will be transformed the weak into the strong through social relationship such as networking and mentoring. In Korean culture, there has been a discourse of middle-aged women, i.e. Adjumma. They are stereotyped as ugly, selfish, and impolite as well as mother-like representation such as warm, generous and frugal, and discriminated institutionally. Thus, to be empowered, women themselves have to develop their capacity or potential and make social network in order to support each other. Lastly, we suggest several strategies for empowering Korean women in terms of individual, interpersonal (intergroup) and societal level.
    번역하기

    In this paper, we'd like to argue that the power of women has been weakened by means of society and social institution in Korean culture. First of all, we reviewed how the power has been conceptualized in academic society compared feminists' viewpoint...

    In this paper, we'd like to argue that the power of women has been weakened by means of society and social institution in Korean culture. First of all, we reviewed how the power has been conceptualized in academic society compared feminists' viewpoint on power. The concept of power has been studied as a thing, which is objectified and decontextualized, and treated as a psychological attribute possessed by a person. The powerful person is always a normal, male, capitalist, and dominant class. In addition, those individuals have the power to control the abnormal, female, laborer, and subordinate class. However, feminists argued that the notion of power has to be conceptualized from the viewpoint of social and cultural context. That is, the power as capacity or potentials will be transformed the weak into the strong through social relationship such as networking and mentoring. In Korean culture, there has been a discourse of middle-aged women, i.e. Adjumma. They are stereotyped as ugly, selfish, and impolite as well as mother-like representation such as warm, generous and frugal, and discriminated institutionally. Thus, to be empowered, women themselves have to develop their capacity or potential and make social network in order to support each other. Lastly, we suggest several strategies for empowering Korean women in terms of individual, interpersonal (intergroup) and societal level.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국인 심리학" 중앙대학교 출판부 2000

    2 "한국아줌마 무죄론: 한국아줌마론속의 사회심리와 약자누명씌우기 현상분석" 162-184, 2000

    3 "한국사회에서 아줌마의 사회적 표상과 아줌마론" 4 (4): 56-67, 1999b

    4 "한국 정치에서의 여성 Empowerment의 과제와 전망" 1-8, 2003

    5 "한국 아줌마론속의 사회심리분석" 250-257, 2001

    6 "한국 기혼여성(아줌마)들의 성격 특성과 주관적 삶의 질." 4 (4): 41-55, 1999

    7 "일상의 정치를 통한 여성의 Empowerment" 19-26, 2003

    8 "여성의 리더쉽 커뮤니케이션과 사회적 권력" 9-18, 2003

    9 "아줌마의 사회적 표상과 역능고찰" 206-209, 1999a

    10 "심리적 구성체로서의 한국 아줌마 분석" 20 (20): 327-437, 2001

    1 "한국인 심리학" 중앙대학교 출판부 2000

    2 "한국아줌마 무죄론: 한국아줌마론속의 사회심리와 약자누명씌우기 현상분석" 162-184, 2000

    3 "한국사회에서 아줌마의 사회적 표상과 아줌마론" 4 (4): 56-67, 1999b

    4 "한국 정치에서의 여성 Empowerment의 과제와 전망" 1-8, 2003

    5 "한국 아줌마론속의 사회심리분석" 250-257, 2001

    6 "한국 기혼여성(아줌마)들의 성격 특성과 주관적 삶의 질." 4 (4): 41-55, 1999

    7 "일상의 정치를 통한 여성의 Empowerment" 19-26, 2003

    8 "여성의 리더쉽 커뮤니케이션과 사회적 권력" 9-18, 2003

    9 "아줌마의 사회적 표상과 역능고찰" 206-209, 1999a

    10 "심리적 구성체로서의 한국 아줌마 분석" 20 (20): 327-437, 2001

    11 "사회심리학의 이해" 학지사 1995

    12 "동아메이트 국어사전" 동아출판사 1996

    13 "The third-person-psychology and the first-person psychology:Two perspectives on human relations" 25 : 239-264, 1998

    14 "The roots of modern social psychology" Blackwell Publishers 1996

    15 "The problem of silence in feminist psychology" 22 (22): 603-625, 1996

    16 "The nature of prejudice" 1954

    17 "The handbook of social psychology" Oxford University Press 1998

    18 "Synonyms or antonyms? In S A century of psychology as science" 60-74, 1992

    19 "Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination" The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc 2 : 357-411, 1998

    20 "Social psychology" Prentice Hall 2000

    21 "Social psychology" Brown & Bench Mark 1996

    22 "Self-determination and empowerment: A feminist standpoint analysis of talk about disability." 28 (28): 671-695, 2000

    23 "Encouragement as a vehicle to empowerment in counseling:An existential perspective" 60 : 6-11, 1994

    24 "Categorical and contextual bases of personal memory and stereotyping Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 778-793, 1978

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.59 1.59 1.81
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.73 1.74 2.599 0.19
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼