RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

      Husserlian Phenomenology in Korean Nursing Research: Analysis, Problems, and Suggestions

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106587477

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: This paper is a critical review of descriptive phenomenological methodology in Korean nursing research. We propose constructive suggestions for the improvement of descriptive phenomenological methodology in light of Husserl’s phenomenological approaches. Methods: Using the key words of ‘phenomenology,’ ‘experience,’ and ‘nursing,’ we identify and analyze 64 Korean empirical phenomenological studies (selected from 282 studies) published in 14 Korean nursing journals from 2005 to 2018. The PubMed and the Korea Citation Index were used to identify the studies. Results: Our analysis shows that all the reviewed articles used Giorgi’s or Colaizzi’s scientific phenomenological methodology, without critical attention to Husserl’s philosophical phenomenological principles. Conclusions: The use of scientific phenomenology in nursing research, which originated in North America, has become a global phenomenon, and Korean phenomenological nursing research has faithfully followed this scholarly trend. This paper argues that greater integration of Husserlian phenomenological principles into scientific phenomenological methodology in nursing research, such as participant-centered bracketing and eidetic reduction, is needed to ensure that scientific phenomenology lives up to its promise as a research methodology.
      번역하기

      Purpose: This paper is a critical review of descriptive phenomenological methodology in Korean nursing research. We propose constructive suggestions for the improvement of descriptive phenomenological methodology in light of Husserl’s phenomenologic...

      Purpose: This paper is a critical review of descriptive phenomenological methodology in Korean nursing research. We propose constructive suggestions for the improvement of descriptive phenomenological methodology in light of Husserl’s phenomenological approaches. Methods: Using the key words of ‘phenomenology,’ ‘experience,’ and ‘nursing,’ we identify and analyze 64 Korean empirical phenomenological studies (selected from 282 studies) published in 14 Korean nursing journals from 2005 to 2018. The PubMed and the Korea Citation Index were used to identify the studies. Results: Our analysis shows that all the reviewed articles used Giorgi’s or Colaizzi’s scientific phenomenological methodology, without critical attention to Husserl’s philosophical phenomenological principles. Conclusions: The use of scientific phenomenology in nursing research, which originated in North America, has become a global phenomenon, and Korean phenomenological nursing research has faithfully followed this scholarly trend. This paper argues that greater integration of Husserlian phenomenological principles into scientific phenomenological methodology in nursing research, such as participant-centered bracketing and eidetic reduction, is needed to ensure that scientific phenomenology lives up to its promise as a research methodology.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이남인, "현상학과 질적연구방법" 한국현상학회 (24) : 91-122, 2005

      2 공병혜, "간호연구에서의 현상학" 한국현상학회 (23) : 151-178, 2004

      3 Norlyk, A., "What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies" 20 (20): 420-431, 2010

      4 Giorgi, A., "The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure" 28 : 235-260, 1997

      5 Giorgi, A., "The status of Husserlian phenomenology in caring research" 14 (14): 3-10, 2000

      6 Sandelowski, M., "The problem of rigor in qualitative research" 8 (8): 27-37, 1986

      7 Englander M., "The phenomenological method in qualitative psychology and psychiatry" 11 : 30682-, 2016

      8 Husserl, E., "Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy:Philosophy as a rigorous science, and philosophy and the crisis of European man" Harper & Row 1965

      9 Giorgi, A., "Phenomenology and psychological research" Duquesne University Press 1985

      10 Crotty, M., "Phenomenology and nursing research" Churchill Livingstone 1996

      1 이남인, "현상학과 질적연구방법" 한국현상학회 (24) : 91-122, 2005

      2 공병혜, "간호연구에서의 현상학" 한국현상학회 (23) : 151-178, 2004

      3 Norlyk, A., "What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies" 20 (20): 420-431, 2010

      4 Giorgi, A., "The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure" 28 : 235-260, 1997

      5 Giorgi, A., "The status of Husserlian phenomenology in caring research" 14 (14): 3-10, 2000

      6 Sandelowski, M., "The problem of rigor in qualitative research" 8 (8): 27-37, 1986

      7 Englander M., "The phenomenological method in qualitative psychology and psychiatry" 11 : 30682-, 2016

      8 Husserl, E., "Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy:Philosophy as a rigorous science, and philosophy and the crisis of European man" Harper & Row 1965

      9 Giorgi, A., "Phenomenology and psychological research" Duquesne University Press 1985

      10 Crotty, M., "Phenomenology and nursing research" Churchill Livingstone 1996

      11 Husserl, E., "Phenomenological psychology: Lectures, summer semester; 1925" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1977

      12 Ahern K. J., "Pearls, pith, and provocation. Ten tips for reflexive bracketing" 9 (9): 407-411, 1999

      13 Munhall, P. L., "Nursing research: A qualitative perspective" Jones and Bartlett 2007

      14 Lincoln, Y. S. ., "Naturalistic Inquiry" Sage Publications 1985

      15 Barkway, P., "Michael Crotty and nursing phenomenology : Criticism or critique" 8 (8): 191-195, 2001

      16 Seidman, I. E., "Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide to researchers in education and the social sciences" Teachers College Press 2006

      17 Husserl, E., "Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, first book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1982

      18 Abalos, E. E., "Husserlian phenomenology and Colaizzi’s method of data analysis : Exemplar in qualitative nursing inquiry using nursing as caring theory" 20 (20): 19-23, 2016

      19 Paley, J., "Husserl, phenomenology and nursing" 26 (26): 187-193, 1997

      20 McConnell-Henry, T., "Husserl and Heidegger : Exploring the disparity" 15 (15): 7-15, 2009

      21 Colaizzi, P., "Existential -phenomenological alternatives for psychology" Oxford University Press 48-71, 1978

      22 Willis, D. G., "Distinguishing features and similarities between descriptive phenomenological and qualitative description research" 38 (38): 1185-1204, 2016

      23 Cohen, M. Z., "Critical issues in qualitative research methods" Sage Publishing 136-156, 1993

      24 Giorgi, A., "Concerning the phenomenological methods of Husserl and Heidegger and their application in psychology" 1 : 63-78, 2007

      25 Tufford, L., "Bracketing in qualitative research" 11 (11): 80-96, 2012

      26 Chan, Z., "Bracketing in phenomenology : Only undertaken in the data collection and analysis process" 18 (18): 1-9, 2013

      27 Groenewald, T., "A phenomenological research design ilustrated" 3 (3): 42-55, 2004

      28 Bevan, M. T., "A method of phenomenological interviewing" 24 (24): 136-144, 2014

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.49 2.49 2.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.87 3.05 3.548 0.42
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼