한국적 창의성과 창의적 환경에 대한 대학생들의 암묵적 이론 = College students' implicit theory of Korean creativity and creative environment

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the college students' implicit theory of Korean creativity. This study deals with the degree to which the students exploit the creativity, and the obstacles for them to exploit the creativity. Another purpose of this study is to explore their implicit knowledge of Korean creative environments. The results are as follows. The implicit knowledge of Korean creativity could be characterized by the following key words: ‘flexibility’, ‘application’, ‘transformation’, ‘originality’, ‘perseverance’, ‘not being stereotyped’, ‘esthetic flavor’ and ‘understanding-new-by-exploring-old’. Students thought themselves to be more or less creative. Students in art and physical education, and male students estimated themselves more creative than other discipline and female. They thought that socio-institutional factors such as educational system focused on the college entrance test are the most serious obstacles against creativity. About half of the students thought the creative persons would have been raised in poor family whereas other students thought differently. The home environment of the creative person was thought to be characterized by the words such as democratic, free and encouraging. Creative persons were thought to be maladaptive school life, but good at peer relations. This study will be used as a pioneer research which suggest a model of Korean creativity.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구에서는 우리나라 대학생들이 생각하는 한국적 창의성 개념과 대학생들이 창의성을 어느 정도 발휘하고 있는지, 그리고 창의성의 저해요인은 무엇이라고 생각하는지 조사하였다. 더불어 한국의 창의적 인물의 가정환경과 학교환경에 대한 대학생들의 암묵적 생각을 탐색하였다. 한국적 창의성은 융통/응용/변환, 독창성, 꾸준한 노력, 탈고정관념, 예술 심미 선호, 온고지신을 포함하였다. 대학생들은 스스로 창의성을 보통 이상(M=3.2)으로 발휘하고 있다고 생각하고 있었으며 전공별로는 예체능계열이, 성별에 있어서는 남학생들이 상대적으로 창의성을 더 많이 발휘하고 있다고 생각하였다. 창의성 저해요인으로는 입시위주의 교육제도와 융통성 없는 사회풍토를 포함하는 사회제도적 요인들을 가장 많이 지적하였다. 대학생들은 한국의 창의적인 인물들이 가난한 가정환경과 부유한 가정환경이라는 극단적인 경제 환경을 가졌을 것이라고 응답하였다. 다음으로 화목하고 민주적이고 자유로우며 지지받는 가정 분위기를 가졌다고 응답하였다. 학교생활 및 환경에 대해서는 창의적 인물들이 학교교육 및 학교생활에 부적응했다고 하는 응답이 가장 많았다. 그리고 교우관계는 긍정적이었다는 응답이 많았다. 본 연구는 한국적 창의성 모형을 제안하기 위한 탐색자료로 활용될 것이다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한순미, "환경은 창의성을 어떻게 조형하는가" 5 (5): 167-188, 2006

2 성은현, "한국 대학생이 생각하는 한국과 미국의 암묵적 창의성에 대한 비교 연구" 17 (17): 365-391, 2007

3 한순미, "창의성-사람/환경/전략" 학지사 2005

4 정범모, "창의력이란 - 그 실체와 육성" 교육과학사 2001

5 성은현, "문화와 창의성. 인하대학교 국제학술대회 발표 자료집 - 아시아 교육의 기적-가정, 학교 그리고 문화적 맥락에서의 아동 발달"

6 성은현, "동서양의 창의성 차이 고찰: 창의적 문화와 환경, 성격, 사고, 산물을 중심으로" 5 (5): 45-62, 2006a

7 Sternberg,R, "the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity" Free Press 1995

8 Mendecka,G., "of parents and development of creativity. In Fostering the growth of high ability: European perspectives" Ablex 1996

9 Dacey, J., "Understanding creativity" Jossey-Bass Publishers 1998

10 Gardner,H., "The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach" Basic Books 1991

11 Amabile,T., "The social psychology of creativity" Springer-Verlag 1983

12 Kim,J., "The relationship of creativity measurres to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students" 55 : 60-74, 1995

13 Dacey,J., "The nurturing parent: How to raise creative, loving, responsible children" Simon & Schuster 1992

14 MacKinnon,D, "The nature and nurture of creative potential" 17 : 484-495, 1961

15 Torrance,E.P, "The beyonders. In Why fly? A philosophy of creativity" Ablex 1995

16 Sternberg,R.J., "The Creativity Conundrum" Psychology Press 2002

17 Harrington., D. M., "Testing aspects of Carl Rogers' theory of creative environment: Child rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents in : Journal of Personality and Social Psychological perspective" Cambridge University Press 1-38, 1987

18 Hallman,R., "Techniques of creative teaching" 1 (1): 325-330, 1967

19 Treffinger, D. J., "Teacher's attitudes toward creativity" 2 (2): 242-248, 1968

20 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure" Cambridge University Press 1993

21 Millward, L. J., "Role expectations as constraints to innovation: The case of female managers" 14 : 93-109, 2002

22 Lubart,T., "Psychologie de la Creativit" Armand Colin 2003

23 John-Steiner,B., "Notebooks of the mind: Explorations of thinking" Oxford University Press 1997

24 Michel,M., "Mother-child relationships and creativity" 4 (4): 281-286, 1991

25 Kim,K.H, "Learning from each other: Creativity in East Asian and American Education" 17 (17): 337-347, 2005

26 Kyung Hee Kim, "Learning From Each Other: Creativity in East Asian and American Education" 17 (17): 2005

27 Sternberg, R. J, "Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, July"

28 Hyson. M. C., "Ingredients of parental pressure in early childhood" 12 : 347-365, 1991

29 Sternberg,R.J., "Implicit Theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom" 49 (49): 607-627, 1985

30 Csikszentmihalyi,M., "Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Handbook of creativity" Cambridge University Press 313-335, 1999

31 Lee,J.K., "Historic factors affecting educational administration in Korean higher education" 32 : 7-23, 1999

32 Amabile,T., "Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity" Creative Education Foundation Press 1989

33 Winner,E, "Gifted children:Myths and realities" Basic Books 1996

34 Eysenck,H., "Genius: The natural history of creativity" Cambridge University?Press 1995

35 Gardner, K., "Family adaptability, cohesion, and creativity" 3 (3): 281-286, 1990

36 Gardner,H., "Extraordinary minds" Basic Books 1997

37 Wollam,J., "Equality versus excellence: The South Korean dilemma in gifted education" 14 : 212-217, 1992

38 Chao,R.K., "East and West: Concepts of the self as reflected in mothers' reports of their child-rearing, Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles"

39 Grzeskowiak,S., "Curiosity in small children and the childrearing style of their mothers. In Fostering the growth of high ability: European perspectives" Ablex 1996

40 Ludwig,A.M, "Culture and creativity" 46 (46): 454-469, 1992

41 Csikszentmihalyi,M., "Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention" Harper Collins 1996

42 Cropley,A.J., "Creativity: A Social approach" 28 (28): 125-130, 2006

43 Amabile,T., "Creativity in context" Westview Press 1996

44 Cropley,A.J., "Creativity and mental health in everyday life" 3 : 167-178, 1990

45 Rudowicz,E., "Creativity and culture: a two way interaction" 47 (47): 2003

46 Lubart, T. I., "Creativity across cultures" Cambridge University Press 1999

47 Barron,F., "Creative person and creative process" Holt, Rinehart, and Winston 1969

48 Moustakis,C.E., "Creative life" Van Nostrand 1977

49 Gardner,H., "Creating Minds" Harper Collins 1993

50 Hills,T.W., "Children in the fast lane: Implications for early childhood policy and practice" 2 (2): 265-273, 1987

51 Walberg, H., "Childhood eminence" 13 : 225-231, 1979

52 Walberg, H., "Childhood eminence" 13 : 225-231, 1979

53 Maduro,R, "Artistic creativity in a Brahmin painter community. Research monograph 14. Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies" University of California 1976

54 Sternberg, R., "Are cognitive styles still in style" 52 (52): 700-712, 1997

55 Rhodes,M., "An analysis of creativity" 42 : 305-310, 1961

56 Torrance,E.P, "A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity" 12 : 195-199, 1968

57 Ng,A.K., "A Cultural Model of Creative and Conforming Behavior" 15 (15): 223-233, 2003