RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1980년대 이후 한국문학에 나타난 제3세계문학의 문제의식 = The 3rd World Literature’s Consciousness in Korean Literature after 1980’s

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105774568

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Although Korean literature has been limited in terms of it’s exchange and connection between international literatures, meanwhile it has been establishing a process in progressive literary national theories after the middle of 1970’s, it has profoundly emerged the understanding horizon on the 3rd world literature. What progressive critic’s theoretical concern and its progressive literary movement face on the consciousness of the 3rd world literature which we can never recognize easily devaluation. It also makes effort to establish people culture with which the 3rd world literature understands through the problematics of realism, regarding the prospect of the national theory. On the other hand, it emphasizes people revolution practice through the literary movement based on complete recognition of the 3rd world realism.
      Regarding this, we should concentrate that what a theoretical position on the 3rd world literature in Korean literary history after 1980’s does not lose its special progressive dynamic when it comes to the efforts of critics and theorists as well as literary movement. Especially, it has been focused by a progressive literary organization. The reason is that so far as progressive national theories being established from 1970’s is clearly different from narrow national theories for ethnocentrism or western imperialism, what we consist of the solidarities with the 3rd world people experienced by emperor’s colonial rule obtains an identity of the 3rd world people. Thus, it rebels against all both structure devil and agent devil affected by capitalistic center, and has strongly regarded the consciousness of emancipation narrative as critic discourse after 1980’s.
      Therefore, Korean literature has been exploring new civilization sense of which creates new aesthetic global horizon by overcoming Eurocentrism aesthetic through steady efforts, although a visible accomplishment is not able to be emerged right now as it continuedly concentrate on exchange between the 3rd world literature after 1980’s.
      번역하기

      Although Korean literature has been limited in terms of it’s exchange and connection between international literatures, meanwhile it has been establishing a process in progressive literary national theories after the middle of 1970’s, it has profo...

      Although Korean literature has been limited in terms of it’s exchange and connection between international literatures, meanwhile it has been establishing a process in progressive literary national theories after the middle of 1970’s, it has profoundly emerged the understanding horizon on the 3rd world literature. What progressive critic’s theoretical concern and its progressive literary movement face on the consciousness of the 3rd world literature which we can never recognize easily devaluation. It also makes effort to establish people culture with which the 3rd world literature understands through the problematics of realism, regarding the prospect of the national theory. On the other hand, it emphasizes people revolution practice through the literary movement based on complete recognition of the 3rd world realism.
      Regarding this, we should concentrate that what a theoretical position on the 3rd world literature in Korean literary history after 1980’s does not lose its special progressive dynamic when it comes to the efforts of critics and theorists as well as literary movement. Especially, it has been focused by a progressive literary organization. The reason is that so far as progressive national theories being established from 1970’s is clearly different from narrow national theories for ethnocentrism or western imperialism, what we consist of the solidarities with the 3rd world people experienced by emperor’s colonial rule obtains an identity of the 3rd world people. Thus, it rebels against all both structure devil and agent devil affected by capitalistic center, and has strongly regarded the consciousness of emancipation narrative as critic discourse after 1980’s.
      Therefore, Korean literature has been exploring new civilization sense of which creates new aesthetic global horizon by overcoming Eurocentrism aesthetic through steady efforts, although a visible accomplishment is not able to be emerged right now as it continuedly concentrate on exchange between the 3rd world literature after 1980’s.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 아시아·아프리카·라틴아메리카문학연구소, (창간) : 2013

      2 김명인, "희망의 문학" 풀빛 11-59, 1990

      3 고명철, "흔들리는 대지의 서사" 보고사 123-159, 2016

      4 (사)한국작가회의 40주년 기념사업단 편찬위원회, "한국작가회의 40년사:1974~2014" 실천문학사 2014

      5 박태순, "한국문학의 현단계 Ⅲ" 창작과비평사 293-315, 1984

      6 김도연, "한국문학의 현단계 Ⅲ" 창작과비평사 261-289, 1984

      7 김종철, "한국문학의 현단계 Ⅰ" 창작과비평사 269-314, 1982

      8 김형수, "특집 좌담: 변화하는 한국사회와 한국작가회의의 전망" (봄) : 6-42, 2008

      9 박태순, "제3세계 문학론" 한벗 175-222, 1982

      10 김명인, "자명한 것들과의 결별" 창비 394-408, 2004

      1 아시아·아프리카·라틴아메리카문학연구소, (창간) : 2013

      2 김명인, "희망의 문학" 풀빛 11-59, 1990

      3 고명철, "흔들리는 대지의 서사" 보고사 123-159, 2016

      4 (사)한국작가회의 40주년 기념사업단 편찬위원회, "한국작가회의 40년사:1974~2014" 실천문학사 2014

      5 박태순, "한국문학의 현단계 Ⅲ" 창작과비평사 293-315, 1984

      6 김도연, "한국문학의 현단계 Ⅲ" 창작과비평사 261-289, 1984

      7 김종철, "한국문학의 현단계 Ⅰ" 창작과비평사 269-314, 1982

      8 김형수, "특집 좌담: 변화하는 한국사회와 한국작가회의의 전망" (봄) : 6-42, 2008

      9 박태순, "제3세계 문학론" 한벗 175-222, 1982

      10 김명인, "자명한 것들과의 결별" 창비 394-408, 2004

      11 김진균, "역사와 사회 1: 제3세계와 사회이론" 한울 1983

      12 갓산 카나파니, "아랍민중과 문학-팔레스티나의 비극" 청사 1979

      13 신동엽, "신동엽전집" 창작과비평사 1980

      14 고명철, "신동엽" 글누림 333-354, 2011

      15 채광석, "민중적 민족문학론: 채광석 선집 Ⅳ" 풀빛 188-198, 1989

      16 조정환, "민주주의 민족문학론과 자기비판" 연구사 160-168, 1989

      17 최원식, "민족문학의 논리" 창작과비평사 346-370, 1982

      18 이재현, "문학과 예술의 실천논리" 실천문학사 65-103, 1983

      19 하정일, "도전과 기회사이에서: 최근 민족문학론의 쟁점과 과제" (겨울) : 39-53, 2001

      20 고명철, "구중서의 제3세계문학론을 형성하는 문제의식" 영주어문학회 31 : 255-277, 2015

      21 "『지구적 세계문학』 창간호"

      22 "『제3세계연구』 제2집" 한길사 1985

      23 "『제3세계연구』 제1집" 한길사 1984

      24 "『실천문학』, 1980년 창간호"

      25 고명철, "1970년대의 유신체제를 넘는 민족문학론" 보고사 2002

      26 韓壽永, "1950년대 한국 문예비평론 연구 : 민족문학론, 실존주의문학론, 모더니즘론을 중심으로" 延世大學校 大學院 1996

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-06-24 학회명변경 영문명 : The Journal of Yeongju Language & Literature -> The Association of Yeongju Language & Literature KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.55 0.55 0.57
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.53 0.47 0.997 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼