론문(論文) : 국가주의와 역사의 착종성: 다카무레 이쓰에(高群逸枝)를 중심으로 = Nationalism and the Entanglement of History: Focusing on Takamure Itsue

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is an essay intended to consider a few issues relating to women’s history by examining Takamure Itsue(1894-1964). Therefore, it aims to reflect on the fundamental topics of history, such as the implications for history of Takamure’s actions as a feminist and female historian, rather than historically studying Takamure as an individual. Takamure Itsue was born in Kumamoto Prefecture on January 18, 1894. Her father was a primary school principal and he taught Chinese classics to his daughter in a countryside blessed by nature. Takamure’s preference for classics and history originates from her father’s Chinese education and her mother’s influence from childhood, which later formed the foundation for her historical research. This study focuses on the 1930s and 1940s in particular, during which period she devoted herself to studying women’s history by immersing herself in it from 1931 onwards. This period coincides with the time when Japan became increasingly involved in the Sino-Japanese War, which makes her indispensable when studying the situations and ideologies of the time. Starting out as an anarchist, Takamure published a number of fanatical texts around 1931 that praised the war, justifying the ‘Pacific War’ as a ‘holy war’ under the logic of ‘marriage harmony(婚姻和協).’ Before then, she had been a defender of the urban lower classes and farm villagers who had fallen into financial difficulties due to the influences of urbanization and industrialization. She advocated for ‘anti-home’ and ‘anti-citizen’ as a critic of modernization more intense than any other. What this study aims to focus on is to examine why she, who had been so cool-headed and had such a critical mind regarding modernity (as shown by ‘anti-home’ and ‘anti-citizen’), could not keep her distance from the modern state and people that had recently come into power. Furthermore, what are the historical and social implications for the course of ‘history’ when an anti-modernist and anarchist converts to being a supporter? These are the two questions this study aims to answer. Takamure found an alternative form of ‘anti-modernism’ (represented by ‘anti-home’ and ‘anti-citizen’) in the ancient kingdom of Japan, stating that the integration of the ancient Japanese kingdom was achieved, not by armed conquest, but by marriage harmony or genealogical ties, which was possible thanks to the existence of the maternal clan since ancient times. Moreover, she declared, “there is no question but that foreign civilizations are inferior to the Japanese civilization that is built on the conscious foundation of the harmony of clans.” As such, her ‘inspiration’ for ‘anti-modernism’ was in the ‘Japanese state’ and ‘people’. Furthermore, Takamure’s assessment that she “thought the true meaning of history is ‘history that gives courage for women to live’ and not history that conveys what happened as it is” shows what she considered the meaning of history to be at a time that was seen as a critical period for Japan. However, there are criticisms of the fact that Takamure’s studies involved ‘creating theories.’ This, perhaps, shows an example of how history is “not something that conveys what happened as it is” but “something that poses ‘current’ problems about ‘the past,’” as merely one of the possible narrations of the past, limited by the ideology of the historian as well as by the methodologies based on that ideology.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이효숙, "우리의 기억은 왜 그토록 불안정할까" 알마 2009

2 폴 리쾨르, "역사와 진리" 솔로몬 2006

3 우에노 지즈코, "안부를 둘러싼 기억의 정치학" 현실문화 2014

4 폴 리퀘르, "시간과 이야기 1,2,3" 문학과 지성사 2008

5 프라센지트 두아라, "민족으로부터 역사를 구출하기" 삼인 2004

6 上野千鶴子, "근대가족의 성립과 종언" 당대 2009

7 이규수, "근대 일본의 학제 형성과 역사 지식의 제도화" 한국사학사학회 (27) : 395-431, 2013

8 高群逸枝論集編集委員会, "高群逸枝論集" 高群逸枝論集編集委員会 1979

9 山下悦子, "高群逸枝論ー"母"のアルケオロジー" 河出書房新社 1988

10 "高群逸枝全集1-10" 理論社 1977

11 "高群逸枝全集 第九卷" 理論社 1977

12 "高群逸枝全集 第九卷" 理論社 1977

13 "高群逸枝全集 第九卷" 理論社 1977

14 "高群逸枝全集 第九卷" 理論社 1977

15 "高群逸枝全集 第八卷" 理論社 1977

16 "高群逸枝全集" 理論社 1977

17 栗原弘, "高群逸枝の婚姻女性史像の研究" 高科書店 212 : 1994

18 村上信彦, "高群逸枝の女性史学" 32 : 1980

19 村上信彦, "高群逸枝と柳田国男" 大和書房 1977

20 高良留美子, "高群逸枝とボーヴォワール" 亜紀書房 1976

21 鹿野正直, "高群逸枝" 朝日新聞社 1985

22 上野千鶴子, "高群女性史 どう受け継ぐかーナショナリズムとフェミニズムのあいだで"

23 陸軍少将, "満蒙と国防"

24 西川祐子, "母性を問う,下" 人文書院 1985

25 西川祐子, "森の家の巫女高群逸枝" 新潮社 1982

26 牟田和惠, "戰略としての家族" 新曜社 1996

27 津田左右吉, "岩波日本史講座" 岩波書店 1934

28 寺田操, "對なるエロス 高群逸枝 : 戀愛論,戀愛創生への試み" 砂子屋書房 1983

29 石牟礼道子, "ジェンダーと女性" 早稲田大学出版部 1997

30 栗原弘, "ジェンだーと女性" 早稲田大学出版 部 1997

31 上野千鶴子ほか, "ジェンだーと女性" 早稲田大学出版部 1997

32 橋本憲三, "わが高群逸枝1,2" 朝日新聞社 1981

33 Joan Wallach Scott, "Gender and the Politics of History" Columbia University Press 1988

34 上野千鶴子, ""国民国家"と"ジェンだー"-"女性の国民化"をめぐって" 24 (24): 1996