RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    현행 준조세 통제규범의 문제점과 개선방안 -부담금, 수수료, 기부금을 중심으로- = A Study on the Legal Improvement Scheme of Quasi-Tax in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99620666

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The notion of quasi-tax can be variously defined according to lawyers and scholars. However, it is common in that each definition emphasis the compulsive power on the payers as an essential elements. In this aspect, the scope of quasi-tax can cover surcharge, public service fees and even nov-voluntary donations. In modern countries, governments come to pursue diverse resources to meet their demands for the public finance. In the same context, the korean government has also established and operated lots of quasi-tax during last a few decades. Currently, whole amount of the quasi-taxes which has been imposed on payers is equivalent to that of tax. Actually, the system of quasi-tax itself has many merits and benefits. Nevertheless public opinions on the quasi-taxes are not that favorable. It is mainly because operating activities on the quasi-taxes in Korea have not so transparently controlled by law, compared with the controls on taxes. From the process of preparing to administering quasi-tax, normal control on it is not sufficiently applied. For that reason, justification of quasi-tax is getting weak and there are some requests to amende or abolish it. In this situation, endeavors and trials to improve current quasi-tax system are urgently requested. This paper tries to suggest some legislative ideas for the more transparent quasi-tax system. For this purpose it makes an analysis of current quasi-tax system with an angle of the transparency of public finance, and points out some legislative problems regarding imposition, collection and usage of quasi-tax. In conclusion, the paper insists a comprehensive legislation to control whole quasi-tax from imposition through ex-post audit is needed, and proposes several concrete schemes to improve current laws.
    번역하기

    The notion of quasi-tax can be variously defined according to lawyers and scholars. However, it is common in that each definition emphasis the compulsive power on the payers as an essential elements. In this aspect, the scope of quasi-tax can cover su...

    The notion of quasi-tax can be variously defined according to lawyers and scholars. However, it is common in that each definition emphasis the compulsive power on the payers as an essential elements. In this aspect, the scope of quasi-tax can cover surcharge, public service fees and even nov-voluntary donations. In modern countries, governments come to pursue diverse resources to meet their demands for the public finance. In the same context, the korean government has also established and operated lots of quasi-tax during last a few decades. Currently, whole amount of the quasi-taxes which has been imposed on payers is equivalent to that of tax. Actually, the system of quasi-tax itself has many merits and benefits. Nevertheless public opinions on the quasi-taxes are not that favorable. It is mainly because operating activities on the quasi-taxes in Korea have not so transparently controlled by law, compared with the controls on taxes. From the process of preparing to administering quasi-tax, normal control on it is not sufficiently applied. For that reason, justification of quasi-tax is getting weak and there are some requests to amende or abolish it. In this situation, endeavors and trials to improve current quasi-tax system are urgently requested. This paper tries to suggest some legislative ideas for the more transparent quasi-tax system. For this purpose it makes an analysis of current quasi-tax system with an angle of the transparency of public finance, and points out some legislative problems regarding imposition, collection and usage of quasi-tax. In conclusion, the paper insists a comprehensive legislation to control whole quasi-tax from imposition through ex-post audit is needed, and proposes several concrete schemes to improve current laws.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 중소기업중앙회, "중소기업의 준조세부담 실태분석" 중소기업중앙회 2006

    2 신종익, "준조세의 실태와 정비 방안" 한국경제연구원 2006

    3 손원익, "준조세의 범위와 규모" 한국세무사회 24 (24): 31-39, 2006

    4 김상헌, "준조세의 개념과 규모에 관한 소고: 조세성 부담금과 비조세성 부담금을 중심으로" 한국재정학회 10 (10): 67-91, 2005

    5 신영수, "준조세 운용의 투명성 제고를 위한 법제개선 방안" 한국법제연구원 2007

    6 오준근, "조세 외 금전지급의무제도의 투명성 제고를 위한 법제정비방안" 한국법제연구원 1998

    7 손원익, "우리나라 준조세의 실태 및 정책방향" 한국조세연구원 2010

    8 김진수, "기업의 기부활동과 조세정책" 한국조세연구원 10 (10): 56-83, 2005

    9 감사원, "감사원이 본 민선자치 10년 :성과와 과제"

    10 日本財政法學會, "財政法の基本課題" 勁草書房 2005

    1 중소기업중앙회, "중소기업의 준조세부담 실태분석" 중소기업중앙회 2006

    2 신종익, "준조세의 실태와 정비 방안" 한국경제연구원 2006

    3 손원익, "준조세의 범위와 규모" 한국세무사회 24 (24): 31-39, 2006

    4 김상헌, "준조세의 개념과 규모에 관한 소고: 조세성 부담금과 비조세성 부담금을 중심으로" 한국재정학회 10 (10): 67-91, 2005

    5 신영수, "준조세 운용의 투명성 제고를 위한 법제개선 방안" 한국법제연구원 2007

    6 오준근, "조세 외 금전지급의무제도의 투명성 제고를 위한 법제정비방안" 한국법제연구원 1998

    7 손원익, "우리나라 준조세의 실태 및 정책방향" 한국조세연구원 2010

    8 김진수, "기업의 기부활동과 조세정책" 한국조세연구원 10 (10): 56-83, 2005

    9 감사원, "감사원이 본 민선자치 10년 :성과와 과제"

    10 日本財政法學會, "財政法の基本課題" 勁草書房 2005

    11 樓井敬子, "財政の法學的硏究" 有斐閣 2001

    12 Allen Schick, "The Federal Budget-Politics, Policy, Process-" The Brookings Institute 2000

    13 OECD, "Revenue Statistics of OECD Member Countries" OECD 2004

    14 Richard W. Tresch, "Public Finance(2nd ed.)" Academic Press 2002

    15 기획재정부, "2011년도 부담금운용종합보고서" 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2015-02-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Dankook Law Riview KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.71 0.71 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.56 0.53 0.68 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼