RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Revisiting the Functionalist Approach to Korean Unification: The Role of International Organizations and NGOs

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104131076

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It is often said that the functionalist approach has failed in explaining inter-Korean relations and the road to Korean unification. So, it is regarded by many scholars and policymakers as an invalid theory in proposing any good foreign or North Korea policy. This is mostly because the Sunshine Policy, or South Korea’s engagement policy toward North Korea under the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun governments, had been based on the functionalist approach to regional integration. However, this paper argues that we can still find the validity of the functionalist approach on the Korean peninsula by paying attention to the roles of international organizations (IOs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Most scholars and governmental officials in Korea have been so far interested in spillover effects between the economy and politics when they deal with functionalist approaches. However, they have not paid much attention to other significant logical paths that the theory has produced. In particular, the functionalist approach emphasizes the role of non-state actors and the institutionalization of cooperation as well as spillover effects, but their roles have tended to be ignored in many researches on Korean unification. It is mostly because the Korean peninsula is surrounded by the four great powers, i.e., U.S., China, Japan and Russia. This kind of state-centric approach toward North Korea policy and Korean unification has dominated both academic and policy debates. In this vein, this paper highlights the importance of the role of non-state actors such as IOs and NGOs, thereby bringing the functionalist approach back to the road toward the Korean unification.
      번역하기

      It is often said that the functionalist approach has failed in explaining inter-Korean relations and the road to Korean unification. So, it is regarded by many scholars and policymakers as an invalid theory in proposing any good foreign or North Korea...

      It is often said that the functionalist approach has failed in explaining inter-Korean relations and the road to Korean unification. So, it is regarded by many scholars and policymakers as an invalid theory in proposing any good foreign or North Korea policy. This is mostly because the Sunshine Policy, or South Korea’s engagement policy toward North Korea under the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun governments, had been based on the functionalist approach to regional integration. However, this paper argues that we can still find the validity of the functionalist approach on the Korean peninsula by paying attention to the roles of international organizations (IOs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Most scholars and governmental officials in Korea have been so far interested in spillover effects between the economy and politics when they deal with functionalist approaches. However, they have not paid much attention to other significant logical paths that the theory has produced. In particular, the functionalist approach emphasizes the role of non-state actors and the institutionalization of cooperation as well as spillover effects, but their roles have tended to be ignored in many researches on Korean unification. It is mostly because the Korean peninsula is surrounded by the four great powers, i.e., U.S., China, Japan and Russia. This kind of state-centric approach toward North Korea policy and Korean unification has dominated both academic and policy debates. In this vein, this paper highlights the importance of the role of non-state actors such as IOs and NGOs, thereby bringing the functionalist approach back to the road toward the Korean unification.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김성한, "한반도 통일기반 조성을 위한 비정부기구(NGO)의 역할: 대북 지원 NGO와 북한 인권 NGO를 중심으로" 일민국제관계연구원 19 (19): 143-174, 2014

      2 Moon, Kyungyon, "The role of humanitarian NGOs: impact on South Korean food aid policy towards North Korea from 1995 to 2007" Cranfield University 2012

      3 Haas, Ernst B., "The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-1957" Stanford University Press 1957

      4 Moon, Chung-In, "The Sunshine Policy: In Defense of Engagement as a Path to Peace in Korea" Yonsei University 2012

      5 황지환, "The Paradox of South Korea’s Unification Diplomacy: Moving beyond a State-Centric Approach" 통일연구원 23 (23): 49-72, 2014

      6 Hwang, Jihwan, "The North Korea Crisis and Regional Responses" East-West Center 2015

      7 McCormick, John, "The European Union" Westview Press 1999

      8 Milward, Alan S., "The European Rescue of the Nation-State" Routledge 1992

      9 McCormick, James, "The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2012

      10 Steinberg, James, "Strategic Reassurance and Resolve: U.S.-China Relations in the Twenty-First Century" Princeton University Press 2014

      1 김성한, "한반도 통일기반 조성을 위한 비정부기구(NGO)의 역할: 대북 지원 NGO와 북한 인권 NGO를 중심으로" 일민국제관계연구원 19 (19): 143-174, 2014

      2 Moon, Kyungyon, "The role of humanitarian NGOs: impact on South Korean food aid policy towards North Korea from 1995 to 2007" Cranfield University 2012

      3 Haas, Ernst B., "The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-1957" Stanford University Press 1957

      4 Moon, Chung-In, "The Sunshine Policy: In Defense of Engagement as a Path to Peace in Korea" Yonsei University 2012

      5 황지환, "The Paradox of South Korea’s Unification Diplomacy: Moving beyond a State-Centric Approach" 통일연구원 23 (23): 49-72, 2014

      6 Hwang, Jihwan, "The North Korea Crisis and Regional Responses" East-West Center 2015

      7 McCormick, John, "The European Union" Westview Press 1999

      8 Milward, Alan S., "The European Rescue of the Nation-State" Routledge 1992

      9 McCormick, James, "The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2012

      10 Steinberg, James, "Strategic Reassurance and Resolve: U.S.-China Relations in the Twenty-First Century" Princeton University Press 2014

      11 Kim, Hanna, "Social Networks and Ideological Orientation of South Korean NGOs Involved in the Unification Issues of the Korean Peninsula" 51 (51): 2011

      12 Lingberg, L., "Regional Integration: Theory and Research" Harvard University Press 1971

      13 Bennett, Bruce W, "Preparing for the Possibility of a North Korean Collapse. RAND Corporation Research Report Series" 2013

      14 Stares, Paul B., "Preparing for Sudden Change in North Korea" 2009

      15 Keohane, Robert, "Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition" Little Brown 1977

      16 Kim, Sung-han, "Korea’s Unification Diplomacy: Issues and Directions" 2015

      17 Haas, Ernst B., "International Integration: the European and the Universal Process" 15 (15): 1961

      18 Im, Hyug-Baeg, "Inter-Korean and Cross-Strait Relations through the Window of Regional Integration Theories" 51 (51): 2011

      19 Carlsnaes, Walter, "Handbook of International Relations" Sage Publications 2002

      20 Heywood, Andrew, "Global Politics" Palgrave Macmillan 2011

      21 Mitrany, David, "Functionalism: Theory and Practice in International Relations" University of London Press 1975

      22 Haggard, Stephan, "Famine in North Korea: Markets, Aid, and Reform" Columbia University Press 2007

      23 Choi, Jinwoo, "Contemporary theory of International Relations and Korea" Sahoepyongron 2004

      24 Haas, Ernst B., "Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization" Stanford University Press 1964

      25 Hodges, M, "Approaches and Theory on International Relations" Longman 1978

      26 Keohane, Robert, "After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy" Princeton University Press 1984

      27 Mitrany, David, "A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization" University of Chicago Press 1966

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2021-10-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : JIAS -> Journal of International and Area Studies
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of International and Area Studies
      KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.04 0.04 0.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.05 0.11 0.398 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼