RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Storm-Time Behaviour of Meso-Scale Field-Aligned Currents: Case Study with Three Geomagnetic Storm Events

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106352440

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) satellite magnetic data are used to investigate the latitudinal variation of the storm-time meso-scale field-aligned currents by defining a new metric called the FAC range. Three major geomagnetic storm events are considered. Alongside SymH, the possible contributions from solar wind dynamic pressure and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) BZ are also investigated. The results show that the new metric predicts the latitudinal variation of FACs better than previous studies. As expected, the equatorward expansion and poleward retreat are observed during the storm main phase and recovery phase respectively. The equatorward shift is prominent on the northern duskside, at ~58° coinciding with the minimum SymH and dayside at ~59° compared to dawnside and nightside respectively. The latitudinal shift of FAC range is better correlated to IMF BZ in northern hemisphere dusk-dawn magnetic local time (MLT) sectors than in southern hemisphere. The FAC range latitudinal shifts responds better to dynamic pressure in the duskside northern hemisphere and dawnside southern hemisphere than in southern hemisphere dusk sector and northern hemisphere dawn sector respectively. FAC range exhibits a good correlation with dynamic pressure in the dayside (nightside) southern (northern) hemispheres depicting possible electrodynamic similarity at day-night MLT sectors in the opposite hemispheres.
      번역하기

      Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) satellite magnetic data are used to investigate the latitudinal variation of the storm-time meso-scale field-aligned currents by defining a new metric called the FAC range. Three major geomagnetic storm events...

      Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) satellite magnetic data are used to investigate the latitudinal variation of the storm-time meso-scale field-aligned currents by defining a new metric called the FAC range. Three major geomagnetic storm events are considered. Alongside SymH, the possible contributions from solar wind dynamic pressure and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) BZ are also investigated. The results show that the new metric predicts the latitudinal variation of FACs better than previous studies. As expected, the equatorward expansion and poleward retreat are observed during the storm main phase and recovery phase respectively. The equatorward shift is prominent on the northern duskside, at ~58° coinciding with the minimum SymH and dayside at ~59° compared to dawnside and nightside respectively. The latitudinal shift of FAC range is better correlated to IMF BZ in northern hemisphere dusk-dawn magnetic local time (MLT) sectors than in southern hemisphere. The FAC range latitudinal shifts responds better to dynamic pressure in the duskside northern hemisphere and dawnside southern hemisphere than in southern hemisphere dusk sector and northern hemisphere dawn sector respectively. FAC range exhibits a good correlation with dynamic pressure in the dayside (nightside) southern (northern) hemispheres depicting possible electrodynamic similarity at day-night MLT sectors in the opposite hemispheres.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Bythrow PF, "Variation of the auroral Birkeland current pattern associated with the north-south component of the IMF" 28 : 131-136, 1984

      2 Takesi Iijima, "The amplitude distribution of field-aligned currents at northern high latitudes observed by Triad" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 81 (81): 2165-2174, 1976

      3 H.-C. Yeh, "Storm time electric field penetration observed at mid-latitude" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 96 (96): 5707-, 1991

      4 B. J. Anderson, "Storm time dawn-dusk asymmetry of the large-scale Birkeland currents" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 110 (110): 2005

      5 H. Wang, "Solar zenith angle and merging electric field control of field-aligned currents: A statistical study of the Southern Hemisphere" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 110 (110): 2005

      6 A. M. Du, "Solar wind energy input during prolonged, intense northward interplanetary magnetic fields: A new coupling function" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 116 (116): 2011

      7 Stefan Maus, "Separating the magnetospheric disturbance magnetic field into external and transient internal contributions using a 1D conductivity model of the Earth" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 31 (31): 2004

      8 S. Maus, "Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 9 (9): 2008

      9 H. Lundstedt, "Operational forecasts of the geomagnetic Dst index" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 29 (29): 34-1-34-4, 2002

      10 Cowley SWH, "Magnetosphere-ionosphere interactions: A tutorial review" 118 : 91-106, 2000

      1 Bythrow PF, "Variation of the auroral Birkeland current pattern associated with the north-south component of the IMF" 28 : 131-136, 1984

      2 Takesi Iijima, "The amplitude distribution of field-aligned currents at northern high latitudes observed by Triad" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 81 (81): 2165-2174, 1976

      3 H.-C. Yeh, "Storm time electric field penetration observed at mid-latitude" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 96 (96): 5707-, 1991

      4 B. J. Anderson, "Storm time dawn-dusk asymmetry of the large-scale Birkeland currents" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 110 (110): 2005

      5 H. Wang, "Solar zenith angle and merging electric field control of field-aligned currents: A statistical study of the Southern Hemisphere" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 110 (110): 2005

      6 A. M. Du, "Solar wind energy input during prolonged, intense northward interplanetary magnetic fields: A new coupling function" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 116 (116): 2011

      7 Stefan Maus, "Separating the magnetospheric disturbance magnetic field into external and transient internal contributions using a 1D conductivity model of the Earth" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 31 (31): 2004

      8 S. Maus, "Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 9 (9): 2008

      9 H. Lundstedt, "Operational forecasts of the geomagnetic Dst index" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 29 (29): 34-1-34-4, 2002

      10 Cowley SWH, "Magnetosphere-ionosphere interactions: A tutorial review" 118 : 91-106, 2000

      11 J.-H. Shue, "Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 103 (103): 17691-17700, 1998

      12 G. Le, "Magnetopause erosion during the 17 March 2015 magnetic storm: Combined field‐aligned currents, auroral oval, and magnetopause observations" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 43 (43): 2396-2404, 2016

      13 T. Iijima, "Large-scale characteristics of field-aligned currents associated with substorms" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 83 (83): 599-, 1978

      14 T. Iijima, "Large-scale Birkeland currents in the dayside polar region during strongly northward IMF: A new Birkeland current system" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 89 (89): 7441-7452, 1984

      15 M. Palmroth, "Ionospheric energy input as a function of solar wind parameters: global MHD simulation results" Copernicus GmbH 22 (22): 549-566, 2004

      16 A. D. Richmond, "Ionospheric Electrodynamics Using Magnetic Apex Coordinates." Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences 47 (47): 191-212, 1995

      17 E. Yizengaw, "Ionosphere dynamics over the Southern Hemisphere during the 31 March 2001 severe magnetic storm using multi-instrument measurement data" Copernicus GmbH 23 (23): 707-721, 2005

      18 Sonya Lyatskaya, "Interhemispheric field-aligned currents: Simulation results" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 119 (119): 5600-5612, 2014

      19 J. L. Burch, "IMF B y -dependent plasma flow and Birkeland currents in the dayside magnetosphere: 1. Dynamics Explorer observations" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 90 (90): 1577-, 1985

      20 Stefan Maus, "Fifth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite measurements" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 8 (8): 2007

      21 H. Wang, "Field-aligned currents observed by CHAMP during the intense 2003 geomagnetic storm events" Copernicus GmbH 24 (24): 311-324, 2006

      22 L. Benkevich, "Field-aligned currents between conjugate hemispheres" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 105 (105): 27727-27737, 2000

      23 R. Fujii, "Field-aligned current signatures during the March 13–14, 1989, Great Magnetic Storm" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 97 (97): 10703-, 1992

      24 A. Boudouridis, "Effect of solar wind pressure pulses on the size and strength of the auroral oval" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 108 (108): 2003

      25 C. Wang, "Effect of interplanetary shock strengths and orientations on storm sudden commencement rise times" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 33 (33): 2006

      26 Maus S, "Earth Observation with CHAMP: Results from Three Years in Orbit" Springer 293-298, 2005

      27 C. -I. Meng, "Dynamic Variation of the Auroral Oval During Intense Magnetic Storms" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 89 (89): 227-235, 1984

      28 V. M. Mishin, "Distribution of the field−aligned currents in the ionosphere: dawn–dusk asymmetry and its relation to the asymmetry between the two hemispheres" Pleiades Publishing Ltd 56 (56): 524-534, 2016

      29 S. Ohtani, "Comparison of large-scale field-aligned currents under sunlit and dark ionospheric conditions" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 110 (110): 2005

      30 Ch. Reigber, "CHAMP mission status" Elsevier BV 30 (30): 129-134, 2002

      31 B. J. Anderson, "Birkeland current system key parameters derived from Iridium observations: Method and initial validation results" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 107 (107): 2002

      32 H. Luhr, "An algorithm for estimating field-aligned currents from single spacecraft magnetic field measurements: a diagnostic tool applied to Freja satellite data" Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 34 (34): 1369-1376, 1996

      33 S. E. Milan, "A simple model of the flux content of the distant magnetotail" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 109 (109): 2004

      34 V. O. Papitashvili, "A new model of field-aligned currents derived from high-precision satellite magnetic field data" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 29 (29): 28-1-28-4, 2002

      35 J. T. Emmert, "A computationally compact representation of Magnetic-Apex and Quasi-Dipole coordinates with smooth base vectors" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 115 (115): 2010

      36 Ryan M. McGranaghan, "A Comprehensive Analysis of Multiscale Field-Aligned Currents: Characteristics, Controlling Parameters, and Relationships" American Geophysical Union (AGU) 122 (122): 11,931-11,960, 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-05-12 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences KCI등재
      2010-06-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국우주과학회지 -> Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.18 0.18 0.18
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.15 0.28 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼