RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고대 근동 다신교의 문화 전략과 유일신교의 발달: 아텐과 야훼를 중심으로 = Cultural Strategies of Polytheism and the Development of Monotheism in Ancient Near East: Focusing on Atenism and Yahwism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109139853

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper understands the phenomenon of monotheism in the ancient Near East as a variant of a polytheistic worldview. The monotheisms that arose in ancient Egypt and Western Asia were the result of polytheistic cultures adapting polytheistic cultural strategies to adapt to specific political and social crises. The Aten and Yahweh religions, which are considered revolutionary monotheisms that destroyed the polytheistic worldview, are no exception to this rule. While there are valid reasons for calling them revolutionary, it is still a matter of debate whether they truly rejected the polytheistic worldview. The Yahweh monotheists, not to mention the Aten monotheists, could not have ignored the polytheistic societies of the nations in which they were embedded. The priestly version of Israel’s monotheism under the Persian patronage is not far removed from the Henotheism of Assur, Marduk, and Amun-Re. Nevertheless, it is clear why Aten and Yahweh monotheisms are called “revolutionary”: They were abstractly redefining the divinity of a monotheistic god and were hostile to other gods. And the reason that Aten and Yahweh religions have such a revolutionary character is not exhausted by the political and social context in which they arose, because inclusive monotheisms, like henotheism, are also special forms of polytheism that responded to political and social conditions. The individuality and religious creativity of thinkers cannot be ignored in the development of revolutionary monotheisms. If one were to make a comparison, the Israelite religion of Yahweh seems to be a more specialized phenomenon than the Athenian religion. Unlike other monotheistic religions, where monotheism emerged at the height of national power, Israel's monotheism emerged in the context of state collapse. It is also interesting to note that it was not the work of a single individual, but rather the collaboration of a diverse group of intellectuals. Above all, the continuous documentation of monotheistic ideas (Josiah's Deuteronomic Code, Deuteronomic History, prophetic writings, and priestly texts) seems to be a crucial reason why the monotheistic religion of Yahweh survived in a polytheistic society and remains influential to this day.
      번역하기

      This paper understands the phenomenon of monotheism in the ancient Near East as a variant of a polytheistic worldview. The monotheisms that arose in ancient Egypt and Western Asia were the result of polytheistic cultures adapting polytheistic cultural...

      This paper understands the phenomenon of monotheism in the ancient Near East as a variant of a polytheistic worldview. The monotheisms that arose in ancient Egypt and Western Asia were the result of polytheistic cultures adapting polytheistic cultural strategies to adapt to specific political and social crises. The Aten and Yahweh religions, which are considered revolutionary monotheisms that destroyed the polytheistic worldview, are no exception to this rule. While there are valid reasons for calling them revolutionary, it is still a matter of debate whether they truly rejected the polytheistic worldview. The Yahweh monotheists, not to mention the Aten monotheists, could not have ignored the polytheistic societies of the nations in which they were embedded. The priestly version of Israel’s monotheism under the Persian patronage is not far removed from the Henotheism of Assur, Marduk, and Amun-Re. Nevertheless, it is clear why Aten and Yahweh monotheisms are called “revolutionary”: They were abstractly redefining the divinity of a monotheistic god and were hostile to other gods. And the reason that Aten and Yahweh religions have such a revolutionary character is not exhausted by the political and social context in which they arose, because inclusive monotheisms, like henotheism, are also special forms of polytheism that responded to political and social conditions. The individuality and religious creativity of thinkers cannot be ignored in the development of revolutionary monotheisms. If one were to make a comparison, the Israelite religion of Yahweh seems to be a more specialized phenomenon than the Athenian religion. Unlike other monotheistic religions, where monotheism emerged at the height of national power, Israel's monotheism emerged in the context of state collapse. It is also interesting to note that it was not the work of a single individual, but rather the collaboration of a diverse group of intellectuals. Above all, the continuous documentation of monotheistic ideas (Josiah's Deuteronomic Code, Deuteronomic History, prophetic writings, and priestly texts) seems to be a crucial reason why the monotheistic religion of Yahweh survived in a polytheistic society and remains influential to this day.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼