RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    계층 분석 과정법을 활용한 기초사무IT자격 유형별 경쟁력 요인과 우선 순위 분석 = Analysis on Competitiveness and Priority according to Qualification Type of Basic Business Information Technology Qualifications(BBITQs) based on Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) method

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104207416

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    With advent of knowledge-based industry and society, Basic Business Information Technology Qualifications(BBITQs) have been considered to be essential competencies to manpower who is working not only fields of information and communication but also fields of general industries. This competencies was showed as certificate objectively.
    As all industry sectors have recognized the importance of Information and communication application competencies, BBITQs which were evaluated comprehensive competencies of IT skills including computer application skill and development skill of multi-media contents was treated to be key competencies as much as reading and writing skill.
    BBITQs which are divided into national technical qualifications(NTQs), vendor qualification(VQs) and private qualification(PQs) as well as which have distinctive features according to qualification type, were conducted quantitative analysis based on AHP method. By using AHP method, competitiveness and priority according to qualification type were assessed by testing experts, qualification expert, and university professors.
    Survey results were summarized as fellows;
    Testing experts thought that the competitiveness of NTQs was superior to VQs and PQs. Also BBITQs assured portability, practicability and reliability were considered having competitiveness. Qualification experts thought that VQs were better than NTQs and PQs in terms of competitiveness, and BBITQs showed competitiveness if they were equipped with practicability, portability and reliability. University professors thought that competitiveness of VQs was much better than NTQs and PQs, and they also considered importance of practicability, portability and reliability in order for VQs to have competitiveness.
    번역하기

    With advent of knowledge-based industry and society, Basic Business Information Technology Qualifications(BBITQs) have been considered to be essential competencies to manpower who is working not only fields of information and communication but also fi...

    With advent of knowledge-based industry and society, Basic Business Information Technology Qualifications(BBITQs) have been considered to be essential competencies to manpower who is working not only fields of information and communication but also fields of general industries. This competencies was showed as certificate objectively.
    As all industry sectors have recognized the importance of Information and communication application competencies, BBITQs which were evaluated comprehensive competencies of IT skills including computer application skill and development skill of multi-media contents was treated to be key competencies as much as reading and writing skill.
    BBITQs which are divided into national technical qualifications(NTQs), vendor qualification(VQs) and private qualification(PQs) as well as which have distinctive features according to qualification type, were conducted quantitative analysis based on AHP method. By using AHP method, competitiveness and priority according to qualification type were assessed by testing experts, qualification expert, and university professors.
    Survey results were summarized as fellows;
    Testing experts thought that the competitiveness of NTQs was superior to VQs and PQs. Also BBITQs assured portability, practicability and reliability were considered having competitiveness. Qualification experts thought that VQs were better than NTQs and PQs in terms of competitiveness, and BBITQs showed competitiveness if they were equipped with practicability, portability and reliability. University professors thought that competitiveness of VQs was much better than NTQs and PQs, and they also considered importance of practicability, portability and reliability in order for VQs to have competitiveness.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "체계적인 경력 개발" 경일대학교 출판부 2004c

    2 "증권회사의 경쟁력 결정요인에 관한 연구" 18 : 73-92, 1999

    3 "전문직 자격제도의 현황과 과제" 한국직업능력개발원 2004

    4 "자격제도의 종합적 실태 분석과 개선방안 연구" 한국직업능력개발원 1999

    5 "앞서가는 리더들의 계층분석적 의사결정" 동현출판사 2003

    6 "성공적인 직장 생활" 경일대학교 출판부 2004b

    7 "분석적 계층화 과정법에 의한 전문대학 경쟁력 관련 요소 개발" 2000

    8 "민간자격 운영 실태 분석 및 개선 방안" 한국직업능력개발원 2001

    9 "능력사회를 구현하자" 대구신문 대구논단 2005

    10 "노동시장에서 자격의 활용도 제고 방안" 한국직업능력개발원 2001

    1 "체계적인 경력 개발" 경일대학교 출판부 2004c

    2 "증권회사의 경쟁력 결정요인에 관한 연구" 18 : 73-92, 1999

    3 "전문직 자격제도의 현황과 과제" 한국직업능력개발원 2004

    4 "자격제도의 종합적 실태 분석과 개선방안 연구" 한국직업능력개발원 1999

    5 "앞서가는 리더들의 계층분석적 의사결정" 동현출판사 2003

    6 "성공적인 직장 생활" 경일대학교 출판부 2004b

    7 "분석적 계층화 과정법에 의한 전문대학 경쟁력 관련 요소 개발" 2000

    8 "민간자격 운영 실태 분석 및 개선 방안" 한국직업능력개발원 2001

    9 "능력사회를 구현하자" 대구신문 대구논단 2005

    10 "노동시장에서 자격의 활용도 제고 방안" 한국직업능력개발원 2001

    11 "기초사무IT자격 종목 조정 및 신설 종목에 관한 연구" 대한상공회의소 2004a

    12 "기술계 학원의 평가지표 및 가중치 개발에 관한 연구" 35 (35): 119-131, 2003

    13 "The logic of priorities" 1982

    14 "Quantitative models for performance measurement system International Journal of Production Economics" 64 (64): 231-241, 2000

    15 "Quantitative models for performance measurement system International Journal of Production Economics" 64 (64): 231-241, 2000

    16 "Priority setting in complex problems IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management" 140-155, 1983

    17 "IT 인력의 능력평가제도 도입방안연구-산업체 직무 분석에 의한 S/W 요소기술 개발능력 평가제도의 도입" 정보통신연구원 2002

    18 "Appications of analytical hierarchies" 1-20, 1979

    19 "AHP를 이용한 가격비교사이트 성공요인에 관한연구" 2002

    20 "A new approach to performance measurement - the analytic hierarchy process" 64-72, 1979

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-12-02 학회명변경 영문명 :   -> The Korean Society for Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-08-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국농업교육학회 -> 한국농·산업교육학회
    영문명 : 미등록 ->  
    KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국농업교육학회지 -> 농업교육과 인적자원개발
    외국어명 : Journal of Korean Agricultural Education -> Journal ofAgricultural Education and Human Resource Development
    KCI등재
    2005-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국농업교육학회지 -> 농업교육과 인적자원개발
    외국어명 : Journal of Korean Agricultural Education -> Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.08 1.08 1.21
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.42 1.35 1.587 0.46
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼