RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    연령대별 생활권 설정 및 비교에 관한 연구 : 청주시를 대상으로 = Delineating and comparing neighborhood units by age group : Focused on Cheongju city

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110115008

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Changing urban conditions such as the COVID-19 pandemic and population decline have highlighted the importance of neighborhood spaces, and the significance of neighborhood unit as spatial units in urban planning is being highlighted. While discussions have focused on rationally defining neighborhood unit, little is known about the spatial differences in neighborhood unit that may emerge due to the socioeconomic characteristics of urban residents. In particular, while age-related travel patterns can shape neighborhoods differently, research analyzing this is lacking. This study aimed to delineate neighborhood units by age group and compare their differences. We sampled short-distance trips by age group for one weekday in October 2022, using mobile phone data. Community detection was then used to delineate neighborhood units by age group, and these were then compared. The analysis revealed that the neighborhood units for those aged 60 and older was the smallest on average, while for those in their 20s and 30s, areas such as university districts were designated as independent neighborhood unit. In particular, the study revealed spatial differences in neighborhood units by age group, with areas formed as a single area for other age groups becoming fragmented into multiple area for certain age groups. These findings suggest that future neighborhood-based service provision policies should prioritize distributing services for specific age groups across multiple areas, unlike those for other age groups. This study is expected to serve as useful insight for local governments developing facility and service provision policies through neighborhood-based urban planning.
    번역하기

    Changing urban conditions such as the COVID-19 pandemic and population decline have highlighted the importance of neighborhood spaces, and the significance of neighborhood unit as spatial units in urban planning is being highlighted. While discussions...

    Changing urban conditions such as the COVID-19 pandemic and population decline have highlighted the importance of neighborhood spaces, and the significance of neighborhood unit as spatial units in urban planning is being highlighted. While discussions have focused on rationally defining neighborhood unit, little is known about the spatial differences in neighborhood unit that may emerge due to the socioeconomic characteristics of urban residents. In particular, while age-related travel patterns can shape neighborhoods differently, research analyzing this is lacking. This study aimed to delineate neighborhood units by age group and compare their differences. We sampled short-distance trips by age group for one weekday in October 2022, using mobile phone data. Community detection was then used to delineate neighborhood units by age group, and these were then compared. The analysis revealed that the neighborhood units for those aged 60 and older was the smallest on average, while for those in their 20s and 30s, areas such as university districts were designated as independent neighborhood unit. In particular, the study revealed spatial differences in neighborhood units by age group, with areas formed as a single area for other age groups becoming fragmented into multiple area for certain age groups. These findings suggest that future neighborhood-based service provision policies should prioritize distributing services for specific age groups across multiple areas, unlike those for other age groups. This study is expected to serve as useful insight for local governments developing facility and service provision policies through neighborhood-based urban planning.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼