RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    知的財産權의 證券化에 대한 小考 = A Legal Study on the Securitisation of Intellectual Property Assets

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104134575

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The securitisation of intellectual property assets as "a new trend". It has now been more than seven years since the introduction of the so-called Bowie bonds - regarded as the first ever music royalties future receivable securitisation - which gave rise to IP securitisation as a financing vehicle. In the days before the Bowie bonds, typically the assets being securitized related to tangible receivables such as real estate leases, supply contracts and the like. Such tangible receivables have predictable revenue streams and credit rating agencies are well familiar with the associated risks. In the case of intellectual property rights, the receivables may be licence royalties or other predictable cash flows from the intellectual property.
    In the years since the introduction of the Bowie bonds, a great deal has been written in the business and legal press and in academic journals about securitizing various IP portfolios from copyrights (particularly those associated with music and film) and patents (particularly those associated with pharmaceuticals and high technology) to trademarks and even trade secrets and domain names.
    In South Korea, there are four major issues for the ip -based securitisation such as the lack of credit rating company, and some restriction on in the securities and corporation regulations. The authors point out such problems and suggest solutions.
    번역하기

    The securitisation of intellectual property assets as "a new trend". It has now been more than seven years since the introduction of the so-called Bowie bonds - regarded as the first ever music royalties future receivable securitisation - which gave r...

    The securitisation of intellectual property assets as "a new trend". It has now been more than seven years since the introduction of the so-called Bowie bonds - regarded as the first ever music royalties future receivable securitisation - which gave rise to IP securitisation as a financing vehicle. In the days before the Bowie bonds, typically the assets being securitized related to tangible receivables such as real estate leases, supply contracts and the like. Such tangible receivables have predictable revenue streams and credit rating agencies are well familiar with the associated risks. In the case of intellectual property rights, the receivables may be licence royalties or other predictable cash flows from the intellectual property.
    In the years since the introduction of the Bowie bonds, a great deal has been written in the business and legal press and in academic journals about securitizing various IP portfolios from copyrights (particularly those associated with music and film) and patents (particularly those associated with pharmaceuticals and high technology) to trademarks and even trade secrets and domain names.
    In South Korea, there are four major issues for the ip -based securitisation such as the lack of credit rating company, and some restriction on in the securities and corporation regulations. The authors point out such problems and suggest solutions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박훤일, "지적재산권 로열티의 유동화" 한국경영법무연구소 2001

    2 최병규, "지적재산권 가치평가와 거래에 대한 연구" 한국산업재산권법학회 (10) : 2001

    3 최병규, "지적재산권 가치평가에 관한 연구" 사단법인 한국국제산업재산권보호협회 1999

    4 김동석, "미국유한책임회사의 특징과 설립" 20 (20): 2001

    5 金根秀, "知識財産權의 資産流動化에 관한 硏究" 延世大學校 法務大學院 法學碩士學位論文 2001

    6 義州??井久勝, "知的財産の?券化" 日本??新聞社 2003

    7 林繁樹, "債權流動化の新潮流―地上波テレビ放送權流動化の法務とスキ-ム" 金融財政事情硏究會 (96) : 2002

    8 Stephen Bennett, "“THE IP ASSET CLASS: PROTECTING AND?????? UNLOCKING INHERENT VALUE”, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 402"

    9 Steven L. Harris, "“How Successful was the Revision of UCC Article 9 ?” : Reflections of the Reporters, 74 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1357, 1388"

    10 Gordon v. Smith, "Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets. 2. ed" John Wiley & Sons 1994

    1 박훤일, "지적재산권 로열티의 유동화" 한국경영법무연구소 2001

    2 최병규, "지적재산권 가치평가와 거래에 대한 연구" 한국산업재산권법학회 (10) : 2001

    3 최병규, "지적재산권 가치평가에 관한 연구" 사단법인 한국국제산업재산권보호협회 1999

    4 김동석, "미국유한책임회사의 특징과 설립" 20 (20): 2001

    5 金根秀, "知識財産權의 資産流動化에 관한 硏究" 延世大學校 法務大學院 法學碩士學位論文 2001

    6 義州??井久勝, "知的財産の?券化" 日本??新聞社 2003

    7 林繁樹, "債權流動化の新潮流―地上波テレビ放送權流動化の法務とスキ-ム" 金融財政事情硏究會 (96) : 2002

    8 Stephen Bennett, "“THE IP ASSET CLASS: PROTECTING AND?????? UNLOCKING INHERENT VALUE”, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 402"

    9 Steven L. Harris, "“How Successful was the Revision of UCC Article 9 ?” : Reflections of the Reporters, 74 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1357, 1388"

    10 Gordon v. Smith, "Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets. 2. ed" John Wiley & Sons 1994

    11 John S. Hillery, "The Securitization of Intellectual Property: Recent Trends from the United States" Washington CORE LLC 2004

    12 Bernard H Fischer, "New Patent Issue: Biopharma Royalty Trust,in From Ideas to Assets: Investing Wisely In Intellectual Property, Bruce Berman (editor) New York , John Wiley & Sons, Inc"

    13 Pauline Stevens, "Intersection of Film Finance and Revised Article 9 : A Mystery,?9 UCLA Ent. L. Rev. 211"

    14 Brian Feit, T, "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITIZATION, 891 PLI/Comm 759"

    15 Steven O. Weise, "An Overview of Revised UCC Article 9, in The New Article 9-Uniform Commercial Code 1 (Corinne Cooper ed. 1999)"

    16 F. Scott Kieff, "AN APPROACH TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, BANKRUPTCY, AND CORPORATE CONTROL” (82 Wash. U. L. Q. 1313)"

    17 寺本振透?前田敏博?上野元, ""知的財産?の?券化スキ?ムと法的留意点”, 債?管理 第97"

    18 Jay H. Eisbruck, ""Moody's Approach to Rating Music Royalty and Intellectual Property-Backed Transactions: There's No Business Like Show Business", Structured Finance Special Report, a publication of Moody's Investors Service"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
    2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼