Unlike redevelopment and reconstruction which is a project done by buildings, the urban development by land replotting is a project done by lands. , It is to make irregular shaped lots into regular shaped lots similarly to a farmland consolidation.
H...
Unlike redevelopment and reconstruction which is a project done by buildings, the urban development by land replotting is a project done by lands. , It is to make irregular shaped lots into regular shaped lots similarly to a farmland consolidation.
However, as land owners require housings than plane replotting of the land rearrangement project, the necessity of multi-level replotting is rising from parts of newtown district in Seoul etc.
The sale price of new houses can be lowered, the ratio of natives' resettlement can be increased and land development and housing plan can be carried out on one process by multi-level replotting.
Especially, for smooth operation of urban development projects, the multi-level replotting on the urban development act is to get owners' agreement, and to replace their lands, and then to grant parts of buildings which the manager have disposal rights and joint ownership portion of land where the buildings exist in to a project manager in case of necessity. However at present, regulations of the multi-level replotting is not clear and there is no project which applied that, so there is no example which grasped problems caused by carrying out that.
It is really needed to forecast problems of the multi-level replotting and study about solutions for adopting that in the urban development project by land readjustment.
With this in mind, the purpose of this study is to forecast the problems which is possible to generate when we carry out the multi-level replotting and to suggest a solution as follows through a simulation of that.
First, the application time of the multi-level replotting should be planned according to the time of the replotting of multiple ownership lands. It is appropriate to considerate the multi-level replotting at a development planning stage because it affects the whole project.
Second, the application ratio of the multi-level replotting should not be planned according to the applicants' right area but be planned according to the number of applicants. The valuation of the owners' right is done after the approval of the detailed plan and the approval of the architecture plan is done at asking for the approval of the deteiled plan procedure. Therefore the period is conflicted, and the problem that the architecture plan is approved under condition that the plane architecture area hasn't been defined occurs . So it is reasonable that the architecture plan is approved after estimating the number of households on the basis of the number of applicators, and deciding the plane area on the basis of the estimated number.
Third, the group who pays the cost of architecture should be made clear .
The average rate of the defrayal should be differently applied to the group of the plane replotting and the group of the multi-level replotting for the equality problem which all the land owners should pay the project cost of the multi-level replotting architectures.
For this, it is adequate to classify into the defrayal rate of the land creation and the multi-level replotting on the deteiled plan procedure.
This study is to forecast the problems of the multi-level replotting according to the simulation. But it is not possible to analyse the problems more detailedly on the simulation because of the default of the data. Moreover various studies like the relation between right disposal plan and the multi-level replotting etc can not be done. Therefore next studies should verify more variously the possibility of the multi-level replotting on the urban development project.