RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Feasibility Study of Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Beagle Dogs

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104120825

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Aim of this study is demonstrate the feasibility of Laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) tube placement in dogs by comparing with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement, based on operative time, complications and gastro-peritoneal adhesion evaluation. Eight intact male beagle dogs were used in this study. Tri-Funnel Replacement Gastrostomy tube (Bard Inc., USA) of 20 Fr was used for LG technique and PEG kit (Ponsky “Pull” PEG Kit®, Bard Inc., USA) with soft silicone retention dome consisting of a 20 Fr gastrostomy tube was used. Feeding via gastrostomy tube was performed in two weeks, maintenance energy requirement (MER) divided into 3 separate feeding. LG and PEG were evaluated at intraoperative, postoperative and postmortem period. Mean operative time for the PEG group was significantly shorter when compared with the LG group (p < 0.05). Successful maintenance of gastrostomy tube was confirmed in all dogs. Gastric and peritoneal wall adhesions were formed successfully in each group. The mean adhesion length (AL) and width (AW) were significantly larger in LG group compared with in PEG group (p < 0.05).
      The mean adhesion distance (AD) was not significantly different between two groups (p = 0.182). Consequently, LG is an effective minimally invasive, safe and easy to perform technique for providing enteral nutritional support in dogs.
      번역하기

      Aim of this study is demonstrate the feasibility of Laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) tube placement in dogs by comparing with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement, based on operative time, complications and gastro-peritoneal adhesion ...

      Aim of this study is demonstrate the feasibility of Laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) tube placement in dogs by comparing with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement, based on operative time, complications and gastro-peritoneal adhesion evaluation. Eight intact male beagle dogs were used in this study. Tri-Funnel Replacement Gastrostomy tube (Bard Inc., USA) of 20 Fr was used for LG technique and PEG kit (Ponsky “Pull” PEG Kit®, Bard Inc., USA) with soft silicone retention dome consisting of a 20 Fr gastrostomy tube was used. Feeding via gastrostomy tube was performed in two weeks, maintenance energy requirement (MER) divided into 3 separate feeding. LG and PEG were evaluated at intraoperative, postoperative and postmortem period. Mean operative time for the PEG group was significantly shorter when compared with the LG group (p < 0.05). Successful maintenance of gastrostomy tube was confirmed in all dogs. Gastric and peritoneal wall adhesions were formed successfully in each group. The mean adhesion length (AL) and width (AW) were significantly larger in LG group compared with in PEG group (p < 0.05).
      The mean adhesion distance (AD) was not significantly different between two groups (p = 0.182). Consequently, LG is an effective minimally invasive, safe and easy to perform technique for providing enteral nutritional support in dogs.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Aprahamian CJ, "U-stitch laparoscopic gastrostomy technique has a low rate of complications and allows primary button placement : experience with 461 pediatric procedures" 16 : 643-649, 2006

      2 Marks SL, "The principles and practical application of enteral nutrition" 28 : 677-708, 1998

      3 Dempsey D, "The link between nutritional status and clinical outcome: can nutritional intervention modify it?" 47 : 352-356, 1988

      4 Rothenberg S, "Primary laparoscopic placement of gastrostomy buttons for feeding tubes" 13 : 995-997, 1999

      5 Crane SW, "Placement and maintenance of a temporary feeding tube gastrostomy in the dog and cat" 11 : 770-776, 1980

      6 Khattak I, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in paediatric practice : complications and outcome" 33 : 67-72, 1998

      7 Armstrong PJ, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" 4 : 202-206, 1990

      8 Bright R, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" 23 : 531-545, 1993

      9 Kirby DF, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies : a prospective evaluation and review of the literature" 10 : 155-159, 1986

      10 Jergens AE, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy tube placement in healthy dogs and cats" 21 : 18-24, 2007

      1 Aprahamian CJ, "U-stitch laparoscopic gastrostomy technique has a low rate of complications and allows primary button placement : experience with 461 pediatric procedures" 16 : 643-649, 2006

      2 Marks SL, "The principles and practical application of enteral nutrition" 28 : 677-708, 1998

      3 Dempsey D, "The link between nutritional status and clinical outcome: can nutritional intervention modify it?" 47 : 352-356, 1988

      4 Rothenberg S, "Primary laparoscopic placement of gastrostomy buttons for feeding tubes" 13 : 995-997, 1999

      5 Crane SW, "Placement and maintenance of a temporary feeding tube gastrostomy in the dog and cat" 11 : 770-776, 1980

      6 Khattak I, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in paediatric practice : complications and outcome" 33 : 67-72, 1998

      7 Armstrong PJ, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" 4 : 202-206, 1990

      8 Bright R, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" 23 : 531-545, 1993

      9 Kirby DF, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies : a prospective evaluation and review of the literature" 10 : 155-159, 1986

      10 Jergens AE, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy tube placement in healthy dogs and cats" 21 : 18-24, 2007

      11 Yoshimoto SK, "Owner experiences and complications with home use of a replacement low profile gastrostomy device for long-term enteral feeding in dogs" 47 : 144-150, 2006

      12 Crowe D, "Nutritional support for the hospitalized patient : an introduction to tube feeding" 12 : 1711-1721, 1990

      13 Antonoff MB, "Modified approach to laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement minimizes complications" 25 : 349-353, 2009

      14 Lantz M, "Literature review comparing laparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies in a pediatric population" 2010

      15 Zamakhshary M, "Laparoscopic vs percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion: a new pediatric gold standard?" 40 : 859-862, 2005

      16 Mauterer J., "Kirk’s Current Veterinary Therapy XII Small Animal Practice" WB Saunders 669-674, 1995

      17 Giner M, "In 1995 a correlation between malnutrition and poor outcome in critically ill patients still exists" 12 : 23-29, 1996

      18 Gauderer MW, "Gastrostomy without laparotomy : a percutaneous endoscopic technique" 15 : 872-875, 1980

      19 Bankhead RR, "Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes: comparison of surgical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic methods" 20 : 607-612, 2005

      20 Akay B, "Gastrostomy tube placement in infants and children: is there a preferred technique?" 45 : 1147-1152, 2010

      21 Waschak MJ1, "Evaluation of percutaneous gastrostomy as a technique for permanent gastropexy" 26 : 235-241, 1997

      22 Hewitt SA, "Evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted placement of jejunostomy feeding tubes in dogs" 225 : 65-71, 2004

      23 Rabeneck L, "Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement" 349 : 496-498, 1997

      24 Abood S, "Enteral feeding of dogs and cats : 51cases(1989-1991)" 201 : 619-622, 1992

      25 Loser C, "ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG)" 24 : 848-861, 2005

      26 Devitt C, "Clinical evaluation of tube esophagostomy in small animals" 33 : 55-60, 1997

      27 Ireland LM, "A comparison of owner management and complications in 67 cats with esophagostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tubes" 39 : 241-246, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.05 0.05 0.04
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.04 0.04 0.213 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼