RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Causes and Clinical Relevance of Inconclusive SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Reverse Transcription- PCR Test Results

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107234230

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Inconclusive SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) test results, which are positive for one or more target genes but not all, are problematic in clinical laboratories. In this study, we aimed to investigate the cause and clinical relevance of such inconclusive results.
      Methods: rRT-PCR was performed using the Allplex 2019-nCoV assay kit (Seegene Inc., Korea) targeting the following three genes: E, RdRp, and N. For all inconclusive test results reported from March to June 2020, the frequency per kit, lot number, specimen type, cycle threshold (Ct) and peak values of the amplification curves, positive target genes, and results of repeated or consecutive tests were analyzed.
      Results: A total of 43,268 tests were conducted, of which 93 (0.21%) were inconclusive—49 from 11 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and 44 from non-COVID-19 patients.
      In COVID-19 patients, the results were inconclusive 11.9 ± 4.7 days after diagnosis and were negative 8.8 ± 5.5 days after the inconclusive results were reported. However, in non- COVID-19 patients, they were all negative upon retest and 81.8% of them were identified to have yielded in 2 out of 8 lots. The most frequently positive target genes were N (55.4%) in COVID-19 and RdRp (61.2%) in non-COVID-19 patients, respectively. No difference was observed in the Ct or peak values of the amplification curves for inconclusive samples between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases.
      Conclusion: Inconclusive test results should be reported neither positive nor negative. Such results can be reported as inconclusive without retesting in COVID-19 patients; however, they should certainly be confirmed by a retest in non-COVID-19 patients or newly diagnosed cases.
      번역하기

      Background: Inconclusive SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) test results, which are positive for one or more target genes but not all, are problematic in clinical laboratories. In this study, we aimed to investigate the cause and...

      Background: Inconclusive SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) test results, which are positive for one or more target genes but not all, are problematic in clinical laboratories. In this study, we aimed to investigate the cause and clinical relevance of such inconclusive results.
      Methods: rRT-PCR was performed using the Allplex 2019-nCoV assay kit (Seegene Inc., Korea) targeting the following three genes: E, RdRp, and N. For all inconclusive test results reported from March to June 2020, the frequency per kit, lot number, specimen type, cycle threshold (Ct) and peak values of the amplification curves, positive target genes, and results of repeated or consecutive tests were analyzed.
      Results: A total of 43,268 tests were conducted, of which 93 (0.21%) were inconclusive—49 from 11 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and 44 from non-COVID-19 patients.
      In COVID-19 patients, the results were inconclusive 11.9 ± 4.7 days after diagnosis and were negative 8.8 ± 5.5 days after the inconclusive results were reported. However, in non- COVID-19 patients, they were all negative upon retest and 81.8% of them were identified to have yielded in 2 out of 8 lots. The most frequently positive target genes were N (55.4%) in COVID-19 and RdRp (61.2%) in non-COVID-19 patients, respectively. No difference was observed in the Ct or peak values of the amplification curves for inconclusive samples between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases.
      Conclusion: Inconclusive test results should be reported neither positive nor negative. Such results can be reported as inconclusive without retesting in COVID-19 patients; however, they should certainly be confirmed by a retest in non-COVID-19 patients or newly diagnosed cases.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Barry A, "SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectivity" 395 : 1339-1340, 2020

      2 Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Response guidelines against COVID-19"

      3 Jung J, "Re : low-dose corticosteroid therapy does not delay viral clearance in patients with COVID-19" 81 : e79-e81, 2020

      4 Sung H, "Nationwide external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing, South Korea" 26 : 2353-, 2020

      5 Penarrubia L, "Multiple assays in a real-time RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 panel can mitigate the risk of loss of sensitivity by new genomic variants during the COVID-19 outbreak" 97 : 225-229, 2020

      6 Chu DKW, "Molecular diagnosis of a novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)causing an outbreak of pneumonia" 66 : 549-555, 2020

      7 Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, "List of COVID-19 diagnostic kits authorized for use under emergency use authorizations"

      8 WHO, "Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases"

      9 Moreno JL, "Identification of a coronavirus transcription enhancer" 82 : 3882-3893, 2008

      10 Ki Ho Hong, "Guidelines for Laboratory Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Korea" 대한진단검사의학회 40 (40): 351-360, 2020

      1 Barry A, "SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectivity" 395 : 1339-1340, 2020

      2 Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Response guidelines against COVID-19"

      3 Jung J, "Re : low-dose corticosteroid therapy does not delay viral clearance in patients with COVID-19" 81 : e79-e81, 2020

      4 Sung H, "Nationwide external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing, South Korea" 26 : 2353-, 2020

      5 Penarrubia L, "Multiple assays in a real-time RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 panel can mitigate the risk of loss of sensitivity by new genomic variants during the COVID-19 outbreak" 97 : 225-229, 2020

      6 Chu DKW, "Molecular diagnosis of a novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)causing an outbreak of pneumonia" 66 : 549-555, 2020

      7 Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, "List of COVID-19 diagnostic kits authorized for use under emergency use authorizations"

      8 WHO, "Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases"

      9 Moreno JL, "Identification of a coronavirus transcription enhancer" 82 : 3882-3893, 2008

      10 Ki Ho Hong, "Guidelines for Laboratory Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Korea" 대한진단검사의학회 40 (40): 351-360, 2020

      11 Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Findings from investigation and analysis of re-positive cases"

      12 Hur KH, "Evaluation of four commercial kits for SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction approved by emergency-use-authorization in Korea" 7 : 521-, 2020

      13 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Duration of isolation and precautions for adults with COVID-19"

      14 Lee J, "Do we really need to isolate all children with COVID-19in healthcare facilities?" 35 : e277-, 2020

      15 Corman VM, "Detection of 2019novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)by real-time RT-PCR" 25 : 2000045-, 2020

      16 WHO, "Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic"

      17 Nalla AK, "Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection assays using seven different primer-probe sets and one assay kit" 58 : e00557-20-, 2020

      18 Heungsup Sung, "COVID-19 Molecular Testing in Korea: Practical Essentials and Answers From Experts Based on Experiences of Emergency Use Authorization Assays" 대한진단검사의학회 40 (40): 439-447, 2020

      19 Zhou P, "A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin" 579 : 270-273, 2020

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-03-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한임상미생물학회지 -> Annals of Clinical Microbiology
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology -> Annals of Clinical Microbiology
      KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 () KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.19 0.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.22 0.2 0.651 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼