RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCOPUS KCI등재

      역동적 환경 하에 구매사/주공급사 간의 기술협력은 신제품 개발 프로젝트 성과를 향상시키는가? = A Study on the Technology Collaboration between the Main Supplier and Buyer under the Dynamic Environment: The Focus on the Performance of New Product Development

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106800644

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper investigates the effects of technology collaboration between the main supplier and buyer on buyer's new product development under dynamic environment. Based on 428 Korean manufacturing firms, we conducted regression analysis. The technology collaboration between the main supplier and buyer is adopted as a independent variable and quality, cost and lead time performance of new product development projects are used as dependents variables. Environment dynamic is also used as a moderate variables. We found that the in general, technology collaboration is positively associated with the performance of buyers' new product development, but in the high degree of dynamic environment, technology collaboration is negatively associated with the performance of buyers' new product development unlike our expectation. Thus, we divide our sample into two groups; shipbuilding industry with the low degree of environment dynamic and electronic and IT device industry with the high degree of environment dynamic and conducted a post hoc analysis. As a result, in ship building industry, the technology collaboration is significant to improve NPD projects performance, while in electronic and IT device industry, the technology collaboration with a main supplier is not significant as well as coefficient is negative. In that, under the highly dynamic condition with the fast change of technology and products obsolescence the NPD collaboration with the main supplier does not works unlike a stable environment. This implies that the NPD attributes of buyer are different by their environmental factor and the fit between given environmental feature and the collaboration synergy is critical factor for improving the effect of NPD collaboration between supplier and buyer.
      번역하기

      This paper investigates the effects of technology collaboration between the main supplier and buyer on buyer's new product development under dynamic environment. Based on 428 Korean manufacturing firms, we conducted regression analysis. The technology...

      This paper investigates the effects of technology collaboration between the main supplier and buyer on buyer's new product development under dynamic environment. Based on 428 Korean manufacturing firms, we conducted regression analysis. The technology collaboration between the main supplier and buyer is adopted as a independent variable and quality, cost and lead time performance of new product development projects are used as dependents variables. Environment dynamic is also used as a moderate variables. We found that the in general, technology collaboration is positively associated with the performance of buyers' new product development, but in the high degree of dynamic environment, technology collaboration is negatively associated with the performance of buyers' new product development unlike our expectation. Thus, we divide our sample into two groups; shipbuilding industry with the low degree of environment dynamic and electronic and IT device industry with the high degree of environment dynamic and conducted a post hoc analysis. As a result, in ship building industry, the technology collaboration is significant to improve NPD projects performance, while in electronic and IT device industry, the technology collaboration with a main supplier is not significant as well as coefficient is negative. In that, under the highly dynamic condition with the fast change of technology and products obsolescence the NPD collaboration with the main supplier does not works unlike a stable environment. This implies that the NPD attributes of buyer are different by their environmental factor and the fit between given environmental feature and the collaboration synergy is critical factor for improving the effect of NPD collaboration between supplier and buyer.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권기대, "환경요인, 성장단계 및 조직간 협력전략:창업기업과 대기업을 중심으로" 한국경제통상학회 24 (24): 165-196, 2006

      2 이종선, "중소기업의전략 유형에 따른 혁신활동이 대외개방 인식에 미치는 영향: 외부 지식 탐색 및 시장진입전략의 조절 효과를 중심으로" 기술경영경제학회 21 (21): 199-228, 2013

      3 정도범, "중소기업의 산학연 연구개발(R&D) 협력과 기업 성과 분석" 기술경영경제학회 20 (20): 115-140, 2012

      4 김성준, "중소기업과 대학 간의 산학 공동기술개발 성과의 결정요인에 대한 연구" 기술경영경제학회 19 (19): 145-176, 2011

      5 문성욱, "외부 지식 활용이 한국 제조 기업들의 혁신에 어떤 영향을 미치는가?" 한국기술혁신학회 14 (14): 711-735, 2011

      6 김순기, "신제품개발전략과 성과평가유형이 신제품개발성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한회계학회 11 (11): 63-102, 2006

      7 김성홍, "신제품개발과정에서 공급사슬통합이 기업성과에 미치는 영향" 한국생산관리학회 24 (24): 537-561, 2013

      8 심종섭, "신제품개발 성과에 영향을 미치는 부서간 협력요인에 관한 이론적 토대" 11 (11): 83-100, 1998

      9 정선양, "산학연 협력의 새로운 방향: 산학연 협력연구실 구축을 중심으로" 기술경영경제학회 16 (16): 17-40, 2008

      10 최형필, "기업의 연구협력 선택에 미치는 요인분석 : 한국 제조업체를 대상으로" 기술경영경제학회 18 (18): 153-175, 2010

      1 권기대, "환경요인, 성장단계 및 조직간 협력전략:창업기업과 대기업을 중심으로" 한국경제통상학회 24 (24): 165-196, 2006

      2 이종선, "중소기업의전략 유형에 따른 혁신활동이 대외개방 인식에 미치는 영향: 외부 지식 탐색 및 시장진입전략의 조절 효과를 중심으로" 기술경영경제학회 21 (21): 199-228, 2013

      3 정도범, "중소기업의 산학연 연구개발(R&D) 협력과 기업 성과 분석" 기술경영경제학회 20 (20): 115-140, 2012

      4 김성준, "중소기업과 대학 간의 산학 공동기술개발 성과의 결정요인에 대한 연구" 기술경영경제학회 19 (19): 145-176, 2011

      5 문성욱, "외부 지식 활용이 한국 제조 기업들의 혁신에 어떤 영향을 미치는가?" 한국기술혁신학회 14 (14): 711-735, 2011

      6 김순기, "신제품개발전략과 성과평가유형이 신제품개발성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한회계학회 11 (11): 63-102, 2006

      7 김성홍, "신제품개발과정에서 공급사슬통합이 기업성과에 미치는 영향" 한국생산관리학회 24 (24): 537-561, 2013

      8 심종섭, "신제품개발 성과에 영향을 미치는 부서간 협력요인에 관한 이론적 토대" 11 (11): 83-100, 1998

      9 정선양, "산학연 협력의 새로운 방향: 산학연 협력연구실 구축을 중심으로" 기술경영경제학회 16 (16): 17-40, 2008

      10 최형필, "기업의 연구협력 선택에 미치는 요인분석 : 한국 제조업체를 대상으로" 기술경영경제학회 18 (18): 153-175, 2010

      11 손권중, "국가 산학연 협력 연구개발과제의 목표관리를 위한 정보시스템 효과 분석" 기술경영경제학회 16 (16): 107-139, 2008

      12 황선일, "구매기업과의 신제품 공동개발 과정에서 발생하는 프로젝트 모호성에 대한 실증적 연구: 공급업체의 관점에서" 한국경영학회 40 (40): 1109-1136, 2011

      13 김재영, "공급사개발 및 정보공유가 신제품 개발성과에 미치는 영향 : 신제품 개발 프로세스 통합의 매개작용을 중심으로" 한국인터넷전자상거래학회 14 (14): 123-141, 2014

      14 김창완, "개방형 혁신 지표 개발 및 한국과 일본 기업의 개방형 혁신 비교연구" 기술경영경제학회 20 (20): 199-228, 2012

      15 Chen, I. J., "Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements" 22 (22): 119-150, 2004

      16 Parker, D. B., "Timing and extent of supplier integration in new product development: A contingency approach" 44 (44): 71-83, 2008

      17 Butner, K., "The smarter supply chain of the future" 38 (38): 22-31, 2010

      18 Clark, K. B., "The power of product integrity" 68 (68): 107-118, 1989

      19 DiMaggio, P. J., "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields" 48 (48): 147-160, 1983

      20 Flynn, B. B., "The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach" 28 (28): 58-71, 2010

      21 Tushman, M. L., "Technological discontinuities and organizational environments" 31 (31): 439-465, 1986

      22 Wagner, S. M., "Tapping supplier innovation" 48 (48): 37-52, 2012

      23 Johnsen, T. E., "Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation:Taking stock and looking to the future" 15 (15): 7-197, 2009

      24 Petersen, K. J., "Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain desig" 23 (23): 371-388, 2005

      25 Azadegan, A., "Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: An empirical assessment" 28 (28): 488-505, 2010

      26 Boddy, D., "Success and failure in implementing supply chain partnering: An empirical study" 4 (4): 143-151, 1998

      27 Miller, D., "Strategy‐making and environment: The third link" 4 (4): 221-235, 1983

      28 Jauch, L. R., "Strategic management of uncertainty" 11 (11): 777-790, 1986

      29 Koka, B. R., "Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view" 23 (23): 795-816, 2002

      30 Nishiguchi, T., "Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage" Oxford University Press 1994

      31 Dyer, J. H., "Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage:Evidence from the auto industry" 17 (17): 271-291, 1996

      32 Nahapiet, J., "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage" 23 (23): 242-266, 1998

      33 Krishnan, V., "Product development decisions: A review of the literature" 47 (47): 1-21, 2001

      34 Aldrich, H. E., "Organizations and Environments" Stanford University Press 2008

      35 Shenas, D. G., "Organizational approaches to the implementation of simultaneous engineering" 14 (14): 30-43, 1994

      36 Chesbrough, H. W., "Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology" Harvard Business Press 2003

      37 Wynstra, F., "Managing supplier integration into product development: A literature review and conceptual model" 2001

      38 Kessler, E. H., "Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed" 2002

      39 Handfield, R. B., "Involving suppliers in new product development" 42 (42): 59-82, 1999

      40 Freel, M. S., "Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector:Evidence from ‘Northern Britain’" 40 (40): 289-305, 2006

      41 Brown, J. B., "Environmental uncertainty regarding inventory ordering" 14 (14): 19-36, 1984

      42 Dwyer, F. R., "Environmental relationships of the internal political economy of marketing channels" 22 (22): 397-414, 1985

      43 Achrol, R. S., "Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels" 25 (25): 36-50, 1988

      44 Heide, J. B., "Do norms matter in marketing relationships?" 56 (56): 32-44, 1992

      45 Dess, G. G., "Dimensions of organizational task environments" 29 (29): 52-73, 1984

      46 Swink, B. M. L., "Customizing concurrent engineering processes: Five case studies" 13 (13): 229-244, 1996

      47 Belderbos, R., "Cooperative R&D and firm performance" 33 (33): 1477-1492, 2004

      48 De Faria, P., "Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners" 39 (39): 1082-1092, 2010

      49 Yan, T., "Communication intensity, goal congruence, and uncertainty in buyer–supplier new product development" 31 (31): 523-542, 2013

      50 Miotti, L., "Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis" 32 (32): 1481-1499, 2003

      51 Song, X. M., "Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan" 17 (17): 665-688, 1999

      52 Hoegl, M., "Buyer-supplier collaboration in product development projects" 31 (31): 530-548, 2005

      53 Cannon, J. P., "Buyer-seller relationships in business markets" 36 (36): 439-460, 1999

      54 Lai, K. H., "Bundling digitized logistics activities and its performance implications" 39 (39): 273-286, 2010

      55 Ragatz, G. L., "Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty" 55 (55): 389-400, 2002

      56 Primo, M. A., "An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes" 20 (20): 33-52, 2002

      57 Eisenhardt, K. M., "Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry" 84-110, 1995

      58 Petersen, K. J., "A model of supplier integration into new product development" 20 (20): 284-299, 2003

      59 Jurkovich, R., "A core typology of organizational environments" 19 (19): 380-394, 1974

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 기슬혁신연구 -> 기술혁신연구 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.88
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.92 1.204 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼