RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      A comparison of the fracture resistances of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with endocrowns and glass fiber postcore retained conventional crowns

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102407067

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      PURPOSE This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistances and failure modes of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with endocrowns and conventional post-core retained crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty mandibular premol...

      PURPOSE
      This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistances and failure modes of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with endocrowns and conventional post-core retained crowns.
      MATERIALS AND METHODS
      Thirty mandibular premolars were assigned into three groups (n=10): GI, intact teeth; GE, teeth with endocrowns; GC, teeth with conventional post-core supported crowns. Except for the teeth in group GI, all specimens were cut to 1.5 mm above the cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. Both endocrowns and conventional crowns were fabricated from lithium-disilicate blocks using a CEREC 3D CAD/CAM unit. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling and then to 45° oblique compressive load until fracture occurred. The fracture resistance and failure mode of each specimen were recorded. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and LSD Post Hoc Test (α=.05).
      RESULTS
      The fracture resistances of GE and GC were significantly lower than that of GI (P<.01), while no significant difference was found between GE and GC (P=.702). As of the failure mode, most of the specimens in GE and GC were unfavorable while a higher occurrence of favorable failure mode was presented in GI.
      CONCLUSION
      For the restoration of mandibular premolar, endocrown shows no advantage in fracture resistance when compared with the conventional method. Both of the two methods cannot rehabilitate endodontically treated teeth with the same fracture resistances that intact mandibular premolars have.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Sivers JE, "Restoration of endodontically treated teeth" 36 : 631-650, 1992

      2 Reeh ES, "Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures" 15 : 512-516, 1989

      3 Stern N, "Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations" 30 : 162-165, 1973

      4 Bitter K, "Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review" 20 : 353-360, 2007

      5 Schwartz RS, "Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review" 30 : 289-301, 2004

      6 Hirschfeld Z, "Post and core-the biomechanical aspect" 17 : 467-468, 1972

      7 Ma J, "Photoelastic stress analysis of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems: normal and alveolar bone resorption cases" 30 : 806-813, 2011

      8 Soares PV, "Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode" 99 : 30-37, 2008

      9 Carvalho AO, "Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns" 41 : 76-82, 2016

      10 Guzy GE, "In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement" 42 : 39-44, 1979

      1 Sivers JE, "Restoration of endodontically treated teeth" 36 : 631-650, 1992

      2 Reeh ES, "Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures" 15 : 512-516, 1989

      3 Stern N, "Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations" 30 : 162-165, 1973

      4 Bitter K, "Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review" 20 : 353-360, 2007

      5 Schwartz RS, "Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review" 30 : 289-301, 2004

      6 Hirschfeld Z, "Post and core-the biomechanical aspect" 17 : 467-468, 1972

      7 Ma J, "Photoelastic stress analysis of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems: normal and alveolar bone resorption cases" 30 : 806-813, 2011

      8 Soares PV, "Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode" 99 : 30-37, 2008

      9 Carvalho AO, "Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns" 41 : 76-82, 2016

      10 Guzy GE, "In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement" 42 : 39-44, 1979

      11 Salameh Z, "Fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored using resin composite with or without translucent glass fiber posts" 32 : 752-755, 2006

      12 Chang CY, "Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns" 4 : 110-117, 2009

      13 Lin CL, "Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar" 118 : 87-93, 2010

      14 Huang TJ, "Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin" 18 : 209-215, 1992

      15 Linn J, "Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars" 20 : 479-485, 1994

      16 Sorensen JA, "Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth" 64 : 419-424, 1990

      17 Gegauff AG, "Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns" 84 : 169-179, 2000

      18 Biacchi GR, "Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns" 37 : 130-136, 2012

      19 Bindl A, "Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years-preliminary results" 1 : 255-265, 1999

      20 Bernhart J, "Cerec3D endocrowns--two-year clinical examination of CAD/CAM crowns for restoring endodontically treated molars" 13 : 141-154, 2010

      21 Assif D, "Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth" 71 : 565-567, 1994

      22 Cheung W, "A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration" 136 : 611-619, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.23 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.67 0.59 0.57 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼