RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      세계사의 맥락에서 본 20세기 초 내륙아시아 조사 활동  :  스벤 헤딘과 오타니 고즈이 = Early 20th Century Inner Asian Expeditions in the Context of World History:The Cases of Sven Hedin and Ōtani Kozui

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101090024

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The late 19th to early 20th century was the prime time for the expeditions in Inner Asia. Along the routes taken by the expeditions from Europe, America, and Japan, a great amount of new historical and archaeological materials were unearthed. A large part of Inner Asia, such as Eastern Turkestan and Tibet then was within the Qing dynasty’s territory. Even though the Qing was in decline, the foreign expedition teams could not freely choose their expedition routes. The complex international relations ensued from the imperial powers’ pursuit for expansion into Inner Asia and the Qing’s effort to resist them resulted in many restrictions on entering certain regions. In previous scholarship, little attention has been paid to this complex situation behind the Inner Asian expeditions.
      This essay examines the restrictions on Sven Hedin and Ōani Kozui’s expeditions to Inner Asia based on the newly found materials that had been preserved in Diplomatic Archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. The first section of the essay discusses the conflicts between Britain, Russia, and Qing over Tibet. In 1904, the British Empire invaded Tibet and signed the Treaty of Lhasa, and succeeded in preventing Russia’s exertion of power over Tibet. In 1906, in an effort to reconcile with the Qing, Britain signed the Convention between Great Britain and China Respecting Tibet. Then in 1907, Anglo-Russian Convention was concluded between Britain and Russia, both agreeing not to intervene with Tibet.
      The last section looks into the restrictions that Ōani Expedition suffered during their second and third expeditions. In 1909-1910, Ōani requested to the British Indian Government permission to travel through Karakorum Pass and to conduct research in Nepal and Tibet, only to receive a series of rejections. Afterwards, Ōani visited Britain and declared that his expedition team would go to Inner Asia via Russia and would not conduct research in Tibet. However, Ōani later on changed the research plan of one of his members, Aoki Bunkyo, and ordered him to sneak into Tibet without any official authorization from the British Indian Government.
      번역하기

      The late 19th to early 20th century was the prime time for the expeditions in Inner Asia. Along the routes taken by the expeditions from Europe, America, and Japan, a great amount of new historical and archaeological materials were unearthed. A large ...

      The late 19th to early 20th century was the prime time for the expeditions in Inner Asia. Along the routes taken by the expeditions from Europe, America, and Japan, a great amount of new historical and archaeological materials were unearthed. A large part of Inner Asia, such as Eastern Turkestan and Tibet then was within the Qing dynasty’s territory. Even though the Qing was in decline, the foreign expedition teams could not freely choose their expedition routes. The complex international relations ensued from the imperial powers’ pursuit for expansion into Inner Asia and the Qing’s effort to resist them resulted in many restrictions on entering certain regions. In previous scholarship, little attention has been paid to this complex situation behind the Inner Asian expeditions.
      This essay examines the restrictions on Sven Hedin and Ōani Kozui’s expeditions to Inner Asia based on the newly found materials that had been preserved in Diplomatic Archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. The first section of the essay discusses the conflicts between Britain, Russia, and Qing over Tibet. In 1904, the British Empire invaded Tibet and signed the Treaty of Lhasa, and succeeded in preventing Russia’s exertion of power over Tibet. In 1906, in an effort to reconcile with the Qing, Britain signed the Convention between Great Britain and China Respecting Tibet. Then in 1907, Anglo-Russian Convention was concluded between Britain and Russia, both agreeing not to intervene with Tibet.
      The last section looks into the restrictions that Ōani Expedition suffered during their second and third expeditions. In 1909-1910, Ōani requested to the British Indian Government permission to travel through Karakorum Pass and to conduct research in Nepal and Tibet, only to receive a series of rejections. Afterwards, Ōani visited Britain and declared that his expedition team would go to Inner Asia via Russia and would not conduct research in Tibet. However, Ōani later on changed the research plan of one of his members, Aoki Bunkyo, and ordered him to sneak into Tibet without any official authorization from the British Indian Government.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. ‘영러협상’과 ‘삼국협상’
      • Ⅲ. 스벤 헤딘의 티베트 잠입
      • Ⅳ. 오타니 고즈이의 北京에서의 對淸交涉
      • Ⅴ. 헤딘, 티베트 시가체에서의 체류
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. ‘영러협상’과 ‘삼국협상’
      • Ⅲ. 스벤 헤딘의 티베트 잠입
      • Ⅳ. 오타니 고즈이의 北京에서의 對淸交涉
      • Ⅴ. 헤딘, 티베트 시가체에서의 체류
      • Ⅵ. 영국·영국령 인도 정청의 오타니 고즈이의 티베트 조사 거부
      • Ⅶ. 영국·영국령 인도 정청의 오타니 탐험조사대
      • 카라코람 고개 통과 거부
      • Ⅷ. 오타니 고즈이의 영국에 대한 저항
      • Ⅸ. 맺음말
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 外務省条約局, "英, 米, 仏, 露ノ各国及支那国間ノ条約"

      2 田涛, "清朝条約全集 第三巻" 黒竜江人民出版 1996

      3 中国第一歴史档案館, "清季中外使領年表" 中華書局 222-, 1985

      4 栗原健, "対満蒙政 策史の一面" 原書房 1966

      5 白須淨眞, "大谷探検隊研究の新たな地平 アジア広域調査活動と外務省外交記録" 勉誠出版 16-, 2012

      6 白須淨眞, "大谷光瑞と国際政治社会 チベット, 探検隊, 辛亥革命" 勉誠出版 2011

      7 白須淨眞, "大谷光瑞とスヴェン·ヘディン 内陸アジア探検と国際政治社会" 勉誠出版 2014

      8 箱田恵子, "外交官の誕生 近代中国の対外態勢の変容と在外公館" 名古屋大学出版会 204-205, 2012

      9 "北京特信"

      10 張暁輝, "中華民国第一任内閣総理 唐紹儀" 珠海出版社 2006

      1 外務省条約局, "英, 米, 仏, 露ノ各国及支那国間ノ条約"

      2 田涛, "清朝条約全集 第三巻" 黒竜江人民出版 1996

      3 中国第一歴史档案館, "清季中外使領年表" 中華書局 222-, 1985

      4 栗原健, "対満蒙政 策史の一面" 原書房 1966

      5 白須淨眞, "大谷探検隊研究の新たな地平 アジア広域調査活動と外務省外交記録" 勉誠出版 16-, 2012

      6 白須淨眞, "大谷光瑞と国際政治社会 チベット, 探検隊, 辛亥革命" 勉誠出版 2011

      7 白須淨眞, "大谷光瑞とスヴェン·ヘディン 内陸アジア探検と国際政治社会" 勉誠出版 2014

      8 箱田恵子, "外交官の誕生 近代中国の対外態勢の変容と在外公館" 名古屋大学出版会 204-205, 2012

      9 "北京特信"

      10 張暁輝, "中華民国第一任内閣総理 唐紹儀" 珠海出版社 2006

      11 高本康子, "チベット学問僧として生きた日本人-多田等観の生涯" 芙蓉書房出版 2012

      12 Hedin, Sven, "Trans-Himalaya , vol.Ⅰ" 377-,

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2021-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.57 0.57 0.52
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.45 0.523 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼