RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      로봇활용교육에 대한 교사의 인식 및 실태 분석 = An Analysis of Teachers' Perception and the Status of Robot Based Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105006683

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of the present paper was to offer questionnaire results of teachers' perception and the status of RBE(Robot Based Education). I carried out a survey targeting 116 teachers who had had experiences on RBE. The survey consisted of the following three items: 1) The teachers' general perceptions of RBE 2) The teachers' perception of application of RBE in their class 3) The teachers' perceptions of the teachers' supporting ideas for diffusing RBE. The results showed the following three findings. At first, at the point of the teachers' general perceptions of RBE, the teachers had thought that RBE was effective on learning and instruction of their class and they had abilities carrying RBE out in their class as well.
      Second, at the point of the teachers' perception of application of RBE in their class, many of them reported that the negative reasons of RBE in their class were the waste of instruction time caused by many robot errors. Robot media didn't support instruction contents efficiently, and more time was needed for students to manipulate the robot media than to comprehend their learning contents. On the contrary, at the point of the benefits of RBE, most of them showed that it was suitable for differentiated education. Additionally complementary factors for the diffusion of RBE, they presented that differentiated robots reflecting their curriculum fully was needed to provide with them, and especially in focusing on robot programming.
      The last, at the point of the teachers' perceptions of the teachers' supporting ideas for diffusing RBE, most of them requested teachers training on RBE's field cases. They mostly answered that the activity which had to be supported by school level was teacher training programs on RBE. In addition, they mostly suggested that the hardware and the software which needed to be priorly developed for the diffusion of RBE in the future were teaching methods and differentiated robot media of RBE.
      번역하기

      The purpose of the present paper was to offer questionnaire results of teachers' perception and the status of RBE(Robot Based Education). I carried out a survey targeting 116 teachers who had had experiences on RBE. The survey consisted of the followi...

      The purpose of the present paper was to offer questionnaire results of teachers' perception and the status of RBE(Robot Based Education). I carried out a survey targeting 116 teachers who had had experiences on RBE. The survey consisted of the following three items: 1) The teachers' general perceptions of RBE 2) The teachers' perception of application of RBE in their class 3) The teachers' perceptions of the teachers' supporting ideas for diffusing RBE. The results showed the following three findings. At first, at the point of the teachers' general perceptions of RBE, the teachers had thought that RBE was effective on learning and instruction of their class and they had abilities carrying RBE out in their class as well.
      Second, at the point of the teachers' perception of application of RBE in their class, many of them reported that the negative reasons of RBE in their class were the waste of instruction time caused by many robot errors. Robot media didn't support instruction contents efficiently, and more time was needed for students to manipulate the robot media than to comprehend their learning contents. On the contrary, at the point of the benefits of RBE, most of them showed that it was suitable for differentiated education. Additionally complementary factors for the diffusion of RBE, they presented that differentiated robots reflecting their curriculum fully was needed to provide with them, and especially in focusing on robot programming.
      The last, at the point of the teachers' perceptions of the teachers' supporting ideas for diffusing RBE, most of them requested teachers training on RBE's field cases. They mostly answered that the activity which had to be supported by school level was teacher training programs on RBE. In addition, they mostly suggested that the hardware and the software which needed to be priorly developed for the diffusion of RBE in the future were teaching methods and differentiated robot media of RBE.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 류지헌, "초등학교 수학용 디지털교과서가 성별 및 적용환경에 따라 학업성취와 매체인식에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 24 (24): 53-83, 2008

      2 서영민, "초등학교 교육과정에서의 로봇교육의 가치와 방향" 20 (20): 155-158, 2012

      3 유인환, "창의적 문제해결력 신장을 위한 로봇 프로그래밍의 가능성 탐색" 교육과학연구소 36 (36): 109-128, 2005

      4 유구종, "지능형로봇을 활용한 유아교육기관 선택활동프로그램 구성 및 효과" 한국열린유아교육학회 16 (16): 493-520, 2011

      5 김영실, "지능형 로봇을 활용한 동시활동이 4세 유아의 음운인식과 단어재인에 미치는 효과" 한국열린유아교육학회 16 (16): 389-409, 2011

      6 방승진, "영재학생의 창의성 신장을 위한 교수매체의 활용 방안" 한국수학교육학회 21 (21): 81-105, 2007

      7 배영권, "성별의 차이를 고려한 로봇프로그래밍 교수전략에 관한 연구" 한국컴퓨터교육학회 10 (10): 27-38, 2007

      8 이영준, "로봇의 교육적 활용방안 및 적정 기능연구" 한국교육학술정보원 2007

      9 이영준, "로봇의 교육적 활용 방안 및 적정 기능 연구" 한국교육학술정보원 2007

      10 박정호, "로봇 활용 수학학습이 학습태도 및 문제해결능력에 미치는 영향" 한국컴퓨터교육학회 13 (13): 71-80, 2010

      1 류지헌, "초등학교 수학용 디지털교과서가 성별 및 적용환경에 따라 학업성취와 매체인식에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 24 (24): 53-83, 2008

      2 서영민, "초등학교 교육과정에서의 로봇교육의 가치와 방향" 20 (20): 155-158, 2012

      3 유인환, "창의적 문제해결력 신장을 위한 로봇 프로그래밍의 가능성 탐색" 교육과학연구소 36 (36): 109-128, 2005

      4 유구종, "지능형로봇을 활용한 유아교육기관 선택활동프로그램 구성 및 효과" 한국열린유아교육학회 16 (16): 493-520, 2011

      5 김영실, "지능형 로봇을 활용한 동시활동이 4세 유아의 음운인식과 단어재인에 미치는 효과" 한국열린유아교육학회 16 (16): 389-409, 2011

      6 방승진, "영재학생의 창의성 신장을 위한 교수매체의 활용 방안" 한국수학교육학회 21 (21): 81-105, 2007

      7 배영권, "성별의 차이를 고려한 로봇프로그래밍 교수전략에 관한 연구" 한국컴퓨터교육학회 10 (10): 27-38, 2007

      8 이영준, "로봇의 교육적 활용방안 및 적정 기능연구" 한국교육학술정보원 2007

      9 이영준, "로봇의 교육적 활용 방안 및 적정 기능 연구" 한국교육학술정보원 2007

      10 박정호, "로봇 활용 수학학습이 학습태도 및 문제해결능력에 미치는 영향" 한국컴퓨터교육학회 13 (13): 71-80, 2010

      11 임호권, "로봇 동아리 프로그램 적용에 의한 배틀 로봇 제작 교육과정 개발" 한세대학교 대학원 2010

      12 Austermann, A., "“Good Robot”, “Bad Robot” Analyzing user’s feedback in a human-robot teaching task" 2008

      13 Kozma, R. B., "Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate" 42 (42): 11-14, 1994

      14 Nugent, G., "The use of digital manipulatives in K-12: robotics, gps/gis and programming" 2009

      15 Barron, B., "Teaching for meaningful learning Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding" Jossey-Bass 2008

      16 Dinitris, A., "Teacher Education on Roborics-Enhanced constructivist Pedagogical Methods" Published 2009 by school of Pedagogical and Technological Education(ASPETE) 2009

      17 Toh, D., "Robotics for Learning" 2015

      18 Sullivan, F. R., "Robotics and science literacy : thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding" 45 (45): 373-394, 2008

      19 백상수, "R-러닝에 대한 예비유아특수교사의 관심도 분석 -관심중심수용모형(CBAM)을 중심으로-" 한국특수교육문제연구소 12 (12): 561-586, 2011

      20 Park, I. -W., "Philosophy and strategy of minimalism-based user created robots(UCRs)for educational robotics-education, technology and business viewpoint. International Journal of Robots" 1 (1): 26-38, 2011

      21 Sailer, J., "M2M? Internet of Things ? Web of Things? Industry 4. 0" 13 (13): 3-4, 2014

      22 Takayuki, K., "Interactive Robots as Social Parters and Peer Tutors for Children" 19 (19): 61-84, 2004

      23 Benitti, F. B., "Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools : A systematic review" 58 : 978-988, 2012

      24 Apiola M., "Creativity and intrinsic motivation in computer science education: experimenting with robots" 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2020-11-06 학회명변경 한글명 : 교육종합연구소 -> 교육종합연구원 KCI등재후보
      2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.12 2.12 1.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.78 1.71 2.408 0.47
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼