RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국어능력시험에서의 문법 평가 연구 = Research of the Evauating Grammar on the KPT

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75522573

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper`s purpose is to survey how KPT(Korean Proficiency test) evaluates Korean learners` grammatical competence through analysis of the 6th, 7th, and 8th tests, and to suggest further directions for development of KPT. To put it concretely, I surveyed the frequency and distribution of grammar patterns, and analyze both the types of questions and the type of examination text itself in 6th, 7th, 8th tests. Through this result I reached suggestions that may improve the KPT. Compared to previous tests, the current 6th, 7th, 8th tests are more systematic because questions are following the question making criterion(Kim Wang-Kyu, 2002). However, these tests still have some issues. For example, a few grammar questions are not following their criterion, and unimportant grammar questions are too frequently being asked. As for the types of questions, there appears to be too large a variety of questions, and imbalanced in the percent of question types. Finally, at the higher levels, there appears to be no spoken text. In addition, to gauge the Korean learners` level of communicative competence, there needs to be a list of basic grammar patterns and a list of grammar patterns used in the professional world. Especially, how important, the frequency of use, and common errors that Korean learners make should be a factor in deciding the basic grammar patters list.
    번역하기

    This paper`s purpose is to survey how KPT(Korean Proficiency test) evaluates Korean learners` grammatical competence through analysis of the 6th, 7th, and 8th tests, and to suggest further directions for development of KPT. To put it concretely, I sur...

    This paper`s purpose is to survey how KPT(Korean Proficiency test) evaluates Korean learners` grammatical competence through analysis of the 6th, 7th, and 8th tests, and to suggest further directions for development of KPT. To put it concretely, I surveyed the frequency and distribution of grammar patterns, and analyze both the types of questions and the type of examination text itself in 6th, 7th, 8th tests. Through this result I reached suggestions that may improve the KPT. Compared to previous tests, the current 6th, 7th, 8th tests are more systematic because questions are following the question making criterion(Kim Wang-Kyu, 2002). However, these tests still have some issues. For example, a few grammar questions are not following their criterion, and unimportant grammar questions are too frequently being asked. As for the types of questions, there appears to be too large a variety of questions, and imbalanced in the percent of question types. Finally, at the higher levels, there appears to be no spoken text. In addition, to gauge the Korean learners` level of communicative competence, there needs to be a list of basic grammar patterns and a list of grammar patterns used in the professional world. Especially, how important, the frequency of use, and common errors that Korean learners make should be a factor in deciding the basic grammar patters list.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼