한국판 레토릭 지수(RHETSEN-K)의 개발과 타당화 = The Korean Version of Rhetorical Sensitivity Scale (RHETSEN-K): Development and Validation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: We aimed to develop a Korean version of Rhetorical Sensitivity Scale by Eadie and Powell (1991).
The scale is expected to help communication students and educators by letting them to know what their communication types are and how they can be improved.
Methods: We carried out exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to examine the factor structure of the scale and based on the results we categorized communication types of the respondents. Then, we investigated the correlations among the factors of RHETSEN-K, Communication Competency Scale, and Big 5 to affirm convergent and discriminant validity of RHETSEN-K.
Results: The results of factor analysis suggested the three factors, rhetorical sensitives, noble selves, and rhetorical reflectors as in the original study, but the factor structure was slightly different. The internal consistency of the three factors were all above .7. The results of convergent and discriminant validity showed that rhetorical sensitives were positively correlated with information gathering, taking initiatives, understanding others'perspectives, extroversion, agreeableness, and openness to experience. Noble selves showed a negative correlation with overcoming stereotypes and positive correlations with taking initiatives, extroversion, and openness to experience. Rhetorical reflectors showed negative correlations with self disclosure, taking initiatives, extroversion,and openness to experience.
Conclusion: These results support that the original concepts of the three types are mostly kept in Korea.
Finally, the relationship between rhetorical sensitivity and the East-West cultural differences and educational implications of RHETSEN-K are discussed

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서은국, "한국형 Big 5 축약검사"

2 김장이, "한국인의 의사소통" 106-109, 2006

3 권대식, "직종별 기초직업능력의 중요도 분석" 446-447, 2006

4 馬正健, "어머니의 促進的 意思疏通과 자녀의 人性 特性과의 關係" 서울大學校 大學院 1988

5 정혜진, "어머니와 아동의 성격특성이 아동의 부모-자녀 의사소통 및 또래 관계에 미치는 영향" 98-99, 2008

6 장휘숙, "애착과 의사소통 능력 및 결혼관계 만족의 관계" 한국심리학회 산하 한국발달심리학회 20 (20): 17-32, 2007

7 탁진국, "심리검사: 개발과 평가방법의 이해" 학지사 2007

8 이석재, "생애능력 측정도구 개발연구: 의사소통능력, 문제해결능력, 자기주도적 학습능력을 중심으로" 한국교육개발원연구보고서 2003

9 박영화, "부부의 자존감, 의사소통 방식, 및 갈등대처행동과 결혼만족도간의 관계: 자기효과와 상대방효과" 한국사회및성격심리학회 19 (19): 71-100, 2005

10 백경미, "부모-자녀 간 의사소통과자기효능감이 학교 적응에 미치는 영향" 666-667, 2008

11 이영훈, "레토릭 지수(Rhetorical Sensitivity Scale) ― 커뮤니케이션 능력 측정 가능성의 탐구 ―" 한국수사학회 (7) : 99-118, 2007

12 이지은, "기혼여성의 마음챙김과 부부의사소통패턴, 결혼만족도의 관련성" 한국여성심리학회 12 (12): 331-345, 2007

13 안선경, "개인의 성격과 의사소통 능력 간의 관계" 한국언론학회 48 (48): 321-345, 2004

14 박진채, "가족의사소통, 합리적 진로의사결정, 진로결정효능감의 관계모형 검증" 11 : 37-52, 2004

15 Edwards R, "You need to understand my gender role: An empirical test of Tannen's model of gender and communication" 50 : 491-504, 2004

16 Carlson RE, "The Nurse's Guide to Better Communication" Scott, Foresman and Company 1984

17 Rybacki DJ, "Sensitivity among the members of decision making groups" University of Nebraska 1983

18 Gross DD, "Rhetorical sensitivity: A key concept for creating successful online instruction. TCC-L On-Line Conference; 1997"

19 Ting-Toomey S., "Rhetorical sensitivity style in three cultures: France, Japan, and the United States" 39 : 28-36, 1988

20 Hart RP, "Rhetorical sensitivity and social interaction" 39 : 75-91, 1972

21 Eadie WF, "RHETSEN2: A new measure of rhetorical sensitivity" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association 1991

22 Gotcher JM, "Perceptions and uses of electronic mail: A function of rhetorical style" 15 : 145-158, 1997

23 Teutsch C, "Patient-doctor communication" 87 : 1115-1145, 2003

24 Maquire P, "Key communication skills and how to acquire them" 325 : 697-700, 2002

25 Stewart M, "Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review" 152 : 1423-1433, 1995

26 Knutson TJ, "Development of an instrument to measure Thai rhetorical sensitivity" 2002

27 Dowling S, "Cognitive complexity, rhetorical sensitivity: Contributing factors in clinical skill?" 17 : 9-17, 1984

28 Hart RP, "Attitudes toward communication and the assessment of rhetorical sensitivity" 47 : 1-22, 1980

29 House A, "Androgyny and rhetorical sensitivity: The connection of gender and communicator style" 11 : 11-20, 1998

30 Richmond VP, "An investigation of self-perceived communication competence and personality orientations" 6 : 28-36, 1989

31 Cahn DD, "An exploratory study of the relationship between rhetorical sensitivity, leadership effectiveness, and rank in a military organization. Research report" Research report 1980

32 Jung Lee, "Adolescent girls’eating disordered behaviors and family communication over a four-time period: Latent Growth Modeling (LGM) analysis" 한국건강심리학회 12 (12): 467-492, 2007

33 Knutson TJ, "A cross-cultural comparison of Thai and US American rhetorical sensitivity: Implications for intercultural communication effectiveness" 27 : 63-78, 2003

34 Dell S., "A communication-based theory of the glass ceiling: Rhetorical sensitivity and upward mobility within the technical organization" 35 : 230-235, 1992