RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공식배분법을 활용한 관세평가 제4방법 적용의 개선방안

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103269210

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The 4<SUP>th</SUP> customs valuation method is much more applied for the related transaction of multinational enterprises than other customs method. This method usually results into a big amount of duty imposition. because of the present calculation method of the ratio of the same class or kind for the usual general expenses and profit that is a main component of the 4<SUP>th</SUP> method.
      This study mainly tries to suggest a new method which reform this application method of a ratio of the same class or kind with the Global Formulary Apportionment. The GFA is main discussed in the area of internal revenue tax and applied in some countries, however, can be applied for the customs valuation either. The WTO customs valuation agreement is based on the Arm’s Length Principle and the GFA is based on the Unitary Taxation Principle for the MNE’s transactions.
      Therefore, we need to check how the GFA can harmonize with the WTO valuation agreement and the current Korea Customs Law. This study shows how an usual general expenses and profit of the 4<SUP>th</SUP> customs valuation method can be obtained and how the GFA can be harmonized with a current legal frame of the customs valuation. This reform with the GFA will give a predictability on the duty amount to a dutypayer and reduce the time and efforts of customs authority for examination of MNE transfer prices. This also can be a good measure for the MNE’s tax and duties evasion.
      In this regard, this study introduces a new perspective on the application of the WTO customs valuation agreement.
      번역하기

      The 4<SUP>th</SUP> customs valuation method is much more applied for the related transaction of multinational enterprises than other customs method. This method usually results into a big amount of duty imposition. because of the present c...

      The 4<SUP>th</SUP> customs valuation method is much more applied for the related transaction of multinational enterprises than other customs method. This method usually results into a big amount of duty imposition. because of the present calculation method of the ratio of the same class or kind for the usual general expenses and profit that is a main component of the 4<SUP>th</SUP> method.
      This study mainly tries to suggest a new method which reform this application method of a ratio of the same class or kind with the Global Formulary Apportionment. The GFA is main discussed in the area of internal revenue tax and applied in some countries, however, can be applied for the customs valuation either. The WTO customs valuation agreement is based on the Arm’s Length Principle and the GFA is based on the Unitary Taxation Principle for the MNE’s transactions.
      Therefore, we need to check how the GFA can harmonize with the WTO valuation agreement and the current Korea Customs Law. This study shows how an usual general expenses and profit of the 4<SUP>th</SUP> customs valuation method can be obtained and how the GFA can be harmonized with a current legal frame of the customs valuation. This reform with the GFA will give a predictability on the duty amount to a dutypayer and reduce the time and efforts of customs authority for examination of MNE transfer prices. This also can be a good measure for the MNE’s tax and duties evasion.
      In this regard, this study introduces a new perspective on the application of the WTO customs valuation agreement.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김기인, "한국관세법" 한국관세무역개발원 2015

      2 김기인, "이윤 및 일반경비에 대한 미국의 접근방법"

      3 이창희, "세법강의" 박영사 2014

      4 노택환, "다국적기업 경제학" 율곡출판사 2013

      5 이창희, "국제조세법" 박영사 2015

      6 박 민, "국제이중과세에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 대학원 2000

      7 김기인, "관세평가정해" 한국관세무역개발원 2015

      8 김석환, "공식분배법(Formulary Apportionment)에 따른 이전가격 과세방식에 대한 소고" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 184-209, 2008

      9 이명, "고정사업장 소득금액 계산에 있어 공통경비 배분에 관한 연구 : OECD의 논의를 중심으로" 서울시립대학교 세무대학원 2007

      10 이희연, "경제지리학" 법문사 2014

      1 김기인, "한국관세법" 한국관세무역개발원 2015

      2 김기인, "이윤 및 일반경비에 대한 미국의 접근방법"

      3 이창희, "세법강의" 박영사 2014

      4 노택환, "다국적기업 경제학" 율곡출판사 2013

      5 이창희, "국제조세법" 박영사 2015

      6 박 민, "국제이중과세에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 대학원 2000

      7 김기인, "관세평가정해" 한국관세무역개발원 2015

      8 김석환, "공식분배법(Formulary Apportionment)에 따른 이전가격 과세방식에 대한 소고" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 184-209, 2008

      9 이명, "고정사업장 소득금액 계산에 있어 공통경비 배분에 관한 연구 : OECD의 논의를 중심으로" 서울시립대학교 세무대학원 2007

      10 이희연, "경제지리학" 법문사 2014

      11 Joann M. Weiner, "Using the Experience in the U.S. States to Evaluate Issues in Implementing Formula Apportionment at the International Level" Office of Tax Analysis Papers, U.S. Department of the Treasury 1999

      12 Sarah Anderson, "The Rise of Corporate Global Power" Institute for Policy Studies 2000

      13 Larry Samuelson, "The Multinational Firm with Arm's Length Transfer Price Limits" 13 : 1982

      14 Deborah L. Swenson, "Tax Reforms and Evidence of Transfer Pricing" UC Davis and NBER 2000

      15 Peter Dicken, "Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy" The Guilford Press 2011

      16 Saul L. Sherman, "Customs Valuation_Commentary on the GATT Customs Valuation Code" Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1987

      17 Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, "A proposal to adopt formulary apportionment for corporate income taxation : the Hamilton Project" Law&Economics 2007

      18 Sheri Resenow, "A handbook on t he W TO C ustoms V aluation Agreement" Cambridge University Press 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 0.93
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.87 1.057 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼