RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    “삶이라는 내밀하게 정교한 이 매듭” = “절묘한 조합”의 『안토니와 클레오파트라』

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102056639

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra is a transitional play from his great tragedies to the late romances. In his last plays Shakespeare represents his expanded and comprehensive vision of life with his centrifugal images and expansive symbolism. Thematically this vision is dramatized by the achievement of the virtue of patience by his long-suffering and meandering sea-tossed characters. We can easily find out some thematic resemblance between the late medieval narrative poem, ‘Pearl’ and his romance plays. Both Antony and Cleopatra falls short at the brink of entering that happy paradise of reconciliation at the last moment. However, Shakespeare suggests their happy marriage in death, as did Romeo and Juliet. This after-life vision makes it difficult for us categorize generically both Romeo and Juliet and Antony and Cleopatra in tragedies and comedies. The titular heroes and heroines in both plays are comically rash and impatient. Shakespeare’s experiment in tragicomedies is made possible by his understanding and detached observation of life as a “mingled yarn’ of some “intrinsicate knots” and entanglements. The apparent bipolarism in Antony and Cleopatra of Rome and Egypt, self-indulgence and military discipline, and the Tiber and the Nile, confounds itself into the final reconciliation of the “mighty opposites” and the vision of life in death and death in life at once. Shakespeare succeed in the play in alchemically transmuting his uncertain historical materials into a cosmic myth-making. The myth-making in his last phase is adumbrate in the play’s expanded spatio-temporal structure and images. “This capacity to correlate opposites” makes possible Shakespeare’s oblique criticism of the heroic honour and political powers that be.
    번역하기

    Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra is a transitional play from his great tragedies to the late romances. In his last plays Shakespeare represents his expanded and comprehensive vision of life with his centrifugal images and expansive symbolism. Them...

    Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra is a transitional play from his great tragedies to the late romances. In his last plays Shakespeare represents his expanded and comprehensive vision of life with his centrifugal images and expansive symbolism. Thematically this vision is dramatized by the achievement of the virtue of patience by his long-suffering and meandering sea-tossed characters. We can easily find out some thematic resemblance between the late medieval narrative poem, ‘Pearl’ and his romance plays. Both Antony and Cleopatra falls short at the brink of entering that happy paradise of reconciliation at the last moment. However, Shakespeare suggests their happy marriage in death, as did Romeo and Juliet. This after-life vision makes it difficult for us categorize generically both Romeo and Juliet and Antony and Cleopatra in tragedies and comedies. The titular heroes and heroines in both plays are comically rash and impatient. Shakespeare’s experiment in tragicomedies is made possible by his understanding and detached observation of life as a “mingled yarn’ of some “intrinsicate knots” and entanglements. The apparent bipolarism in Antony and Cleopatra of Rome and Egypt, self-indulgence and military discipline, and the Tiber and the Nile, confounds itself into the final reconciliation of the “mighty opposites” and the vision of life in death and death in life at once. Shakespeare succeed in the play in alchemically transmuting his uncertain historical materials into a cosmic myth-making. The myth-making in his last phase is adumbrate in the play’s expanded spatio-temporal structure and images. “This capacity to correlate opposites” makes possible Shakespeare’s oblique criticism of the heroic honour and political powers that be.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 인용문헌
    • Abstract
    • 인용문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Henn, T.R., "The Living Image: Shakespearean Essays" Methuen 1972

    2 Adelman, Janet, "The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra" Yale UP 1973

    3 Borroff, Marie, "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Patience, Pearl" Norton 2001

    4 Spencer, T. J. B., "Shakespeare’s Plutarch" Penguin 1968

    5 Clemen, Wolfgang, "Shakespeare’s Dramatic Art" Methuen 1972

    6 Traversi, Derek, "Shakespeare: The Last Phase" Harcourt 1954

    7 Pascal, Blaise, "Pensees" Oxford UP 1995

    8 Shakespeare, William, "King Lear" Cambridge UP 2005

    9 Shakespeare, William, "Hamlet" Methuen 1981

    10 Roerecke, Edith M., "Essays on Shakespeare" Pennsylvania UP 182-195, 1965

    1 Henn, T.R., "The Living Image: Shakespearean Essays" Methuen 1972

    2 Adelman, Janet, "The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra" Yale UP 1973

    3 Borroff, Marie, "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Patience, Pearl" Norton 2001

    4 Spencer, T. J. B., "Shakespeare’s Plutarch" Penguin 1968

    5 Clemen, Wolfgang, "Shakespeare’s Dramatic Art" Methuen 1972

    6 Traversi, Derek, "Shakespeare: The Last Phase" Harcourt 1954

    7 Pascal, Blaise, "Pensees" Oxford UP 1995

    8 Shakespeare, William, "King Lear" Cambridge UP 2005

    9 Shakespeare, William, "Hamlet" Methuen 1981

    10 Roerecke, Edith M., "Essays on Shakespeare" Pennsylvania UP 182-195, 1965

    11 Shakespeare, William, "Antony and Cleopatra" Cambridge UP 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.12 0.12 0.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.12 0.11 0.561 0.03
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼