Donor Coordination of economic assistance to Eastern Europe : mechanisms and origins of sectoral governance in international relations

목차 (Table of Contents)

• CONTENTS
• ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
• PREFACE : INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS AND AN INTEREST-ORIENTED REALIST APPROACH = XIII
• 1 A BASIC INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY = 1
• 1.1 THE SETTING : ASSISTANCE TO EASTERN EUROPE AND DONOR COORDINATION = 1
• 1.2 A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO A THEORETICAL MERGER = 3
• 1.3 THE COMPARATIVE UNDERTAKING = 4
• 1.4 THE ASSISTANCE SECTOR AS THE FRAMEWORK OF ANALYSIS = 5
• 1.5 DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ASSISTANCE SECTORS = 6
• 2 A RATIONAL-CHOICE APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE AND DONOR COORDINATION = 9
• 2.1 THE MARKET VIEW OF ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE = 9
• 2.2 BEHAVIORAL ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT DONOR AGENCIES = 9
• 2.2.1 Operational characteristics of bilateral donors = 10
• 2.2.2 Operational characteristics of multilateral donors = 11
• 2.3 A MARKET FAILURE FRAMEWORK FOR THE RATIONALISTIC STUDY OF DONOR COORDINATION = 13
• 2.3.1 The costs of coordination = 13
• 2.3.2 Assistance to Eastern Europe : High coordination costs and a lack of donor coordination = 15
• 2.3.3 Donor coordination as a vehicle for solving collective goods problems due to market failure = 17
• 3 THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO AN INSTITUTIONALIST STUDY OF SECTORAL GOVERNANCE = 20
• 3.1 INTERORGANIZATION THEORY = 21
• 3.1.1 Resource dependency = 22
• 3.1.2 Political advocacy and collective actors = 23
• 3.1.3 Task complexity = 25
• 3.1.4 Intermediate summary : managing uncertainty = 26
• 3.2 TRANSACTION COST ECONOMICS(TCE) = 26
• 3.2.1 The basic tenets of transaction cost economics = 27
• 3.2.2 Putting transaction cost economics to work = 30
• 3.2.3 Exploring the intersection between NIE and donor coordination = 32
• 3.2.4 Criticisms of NIE for the study of international relations or : What is the heuristic value of TCE in modeling donor coordination? = 33
• 3.3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY = 35
• 3.3.1 Interdependence theories of international cooperation = 36
• 3.3.2 Realist theories of international cooperation and the role of hegemony = 37
• 4 HOW TO OPERATIONALIZE DONOR COORDINATION = 39
• 4.1 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DONOR COORDINATION = 39
• 4.1.1 Assessing the effectiveness of donor coordination with respect to individual recipients = 40
• 4.1.1.1 The goal-attainment dimension = 41
• 4.1.1.2 The project control dimension = 42
• 4.1.2 Assessing the effectiveness of donor coordination with respect to a group, of recipients = 43
• 4.2 THE EFFICIENCY OF DONOR COORDINATION : EXTENT OF COORDINATION = 44
• 4.3 MEASURING THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF DONOR COORDINATION = 45
• 5 SHORT OUTLINE OF THE RESEARCH DESIGN = 47
• 5.1 SECTOR SELECTION AND HYPOTHESES EVALUATION = 47
• 5.1.1 Strategic relevance : mass privatization vs. agriculture = 47
• 5.1.2 Asset specificity : conventional power vs. telecommunications = 48
• 5.1.3 Interdependence : environment vs. education = 49
• 5.1.4 Task complexity and hegemony : central banking vs. statistics = 50
• 6 THE CASE OF MASS PRIVATIZATION VS. AGRICULTURE = 53
• 6.1 THE CASE OF MASS PRIVATIZATION = 53
• 6.1.1 The role of mass privatization in systemic transformation = 53
• 6.1.1.1 Mass privatization and the ownership change dilemma = 53
• 6.1.1.2 The implementation of mass privatization programs in Eastern Europe = 56
• 6.1.2 External support to mass privatization and its coordination = 59
• 6.1.2.1 Conceptional differences within the donor community - MPPs vs. restructuring = 59
• 6.1.2.2 Donor support to mass privatization = 61
• 6.1.2.3 Assumptions regarding the resulting dynamics of donor coordination = 62
• 6.1.3 Sectoral assistance coordination : country abstracts = 63
• 6.1.3.1 Poland = 63
• 6.1.3.2 Romania = 64
• 6.1.3.3 Ukraine = 66
• 6.1.4 Assistance to mass privatization : taking stock of donor coordination = 68
• 6.2 THE CASE OF AGRICULTURE = 71
• 6.2.1 Agriculture in transition = 71
• 6.2.2 Assistance to agricultural reform and its coordination = 74
• 6.2.2.1 Recipient coordination of agricultural assistance = 75
• 6.2.2.2 Donor coordination of agricultural assistance = 75
• 6.2.2.3 Assumptions regarding the resulting dynamics of donor coordination = 77
• 6.2.3 Sectoral assistance coordination : country abstracts = 78
• 6.2.3.1 Poland = 78
• 6.2.3.2 Romania = 79
• 6.2.3.3 Ukraine = 81
• 6.2.4 Assistance to agriculture : taking stock of donor coordination = 82
• 6.3 CONCLUSION OF THE CASE STUDY = 84
• 7 THE CASE OF CONVENTIONAL POWER VS. TELECOMMUNICATIONS = 86
• 7.1 THE CASE OF CONVENTIONAL POWER = 87
• 7.1.1 Conventional power in transition = 87
• 7.1.2 Features of the power sector with a potential bearing on sectoral assistance coordination = 88
• 7.1.2.1 Restructuring the power sector in the CEECs／NIS = 88
• 7.1.2.3 Private and multilateral financing = 91
• 7.1.2.4 Assumptions regarding the resulting dynamics of donor coordination = 92
• 7.1.3 Sectoral assistance coordination : country abstracts = 93
• 7.1.3.1 Poland = 93
• 7.1.3.2 Romania = 95
• 7.1.3.3 Ukraine = 96
• 7.1.4 Assistance to conventional power : taking stock of donor coordination = 98
• 7.2 THE CASE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS = 100
• 7.2.1 Telecommunications in transition = 100
• 7.2.2 Features of the telecoms sector with a potential bearing on sectoral assistance coordination = 102
• 7.2.2.1 Restructuring telecommunications in the CEECs／NIS = 103
• 7.2.2.2 The economic and technological characteristics of the telecommunications business = 105
• 7.2.2.3 Private and multilateral financing = 107
• 7.2.2.4 Assumptions regarding the resulting dynamics of donor coordination = 108
• 7.2.3 Sectoral assistance coordination : country abstracts = 109
• 7.2.3.1 Poland = 109
• 7.2.3.2 Romania = 112
• 7.2.3.3 Ukraine = 112
• 7.2.4 Assistance to telecoms : taking stock of donor coordination = 113
• 7.3 CONCLUSION OF THE CASE STUDY = 115
• 8 CASE STUDY ON ENVIRONMENT VS. EDUCATION = 119
• 8.1 THE CASE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE = 120
• 8.1.1 Environments in transition = 120
• 8.1.2 The contribution of international economic assistance = 121
• 8.1.3 The coordination of environmental assistance to Eastern Europe = 122
• 8.1.3.1 The Environment for Europe(EfE) process = 124
• 8.1.3.2 The role of the EAP Task Force and the NEAPs in guiding assistance = 128
• 8.1.3.3 Bringing donors together : the PPC = 131
• 8.1.3.4 The role of regional environmental programs and other initiatives in coordinating assistance = 138
• 8.1.4 Environmental assistance : taking stock of donor coordination = 141
• 8.2 THE CASE OF ASSISTANCE TO EDUCATION AND TRAINING = 143
• 8.2.1 Education and training in transition = 143
• 8.2.2 Assistance to education and training systems and its coordination = 145
• 8.2.2.1 Factors conditioning assistance coordination = 145
• 8.2.2.2 Bilateral assistance to education and training systems = 147
• 8.2.2.3 Multilateral assistance to education and training systems and NGOs = 149
• 8.2.3 Assistance to education and training : taking stock of donor coordination = 152
• 8.3 CONCLUSION OF THE CASE STUDY = 154
• 9 CASE STUDY OF CENTRAL BANKING VS. STATISTICS = 157
• 9.1 THE CASE OF CENTRAL BANKING = 157
• 9.1.1 Central banking in transition = 157
• 9.1.2 International support to central banking and its coordination = 158
• 9.1.2.1 The contribution of international organizations = 158
• 9.1.2.2 Coordination arrangements : the case of the CEECs = 161
• 9.1.2.3 Coordination arrangements : the case of the Baltic／FSU countries = 162
• 9.1.3 Assistance to central banking : taking stock of donor coordination = 163
• 9.2 THE CASE OF STATISTICS = 166
• 9.2.1 Statistics in transition = 166
• 9.2.2 International support to statistics and its coordination = 167
• 9.2.2.1 The contribution of international organizations and bilateral donors = 167
• 9.2.2.2 Coordination arrangements : the case of the CEECs = 168
• 9.2.2.3 Coordination arrangements : the case of the Baltic／FSU countries = 170
• 9.2.3 Assistance to statistics : taking stock of donor coordination = 173
• 9.3 CONCLUSION OF THE CASE STUDY = 175
• 10 SECTORAL GOVERNANCE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. MAIN FINDINGS AND THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS = 178
• 10.1 RESULTS OF THE EMPIRICAL SECTOR STUDIES = 179
• 10.2 INTERVENING VARIABLES AND QUESTIONS OPEN TO FURTHER RESEARCH = 181
• 10.3 RATIONAL DONORS AND THE EMERGENCE OF COOPERATION IN ABSENCE OF HEGEMONY = 182
• 11 APPENDIX Ⅰ. FULL COUNTRY REPORTS = 185
• 11.1 MASS PRIVATIZATION = 185
• 11.1.1 Poland = 185
• 11.1.2 Romania = 189
• 11.1.3 Ukraine = 196
• 11.2. AGRICULTURE = 202
• 11.2.1 Poland = 202
• 11.2.2 Romania = 204
• 11.2.3 Ukraine = 206
• 11.3 CONVENTIONAL POWER = 208
• 11.3.1 Poland = 208
• 11.3.2 Romania = 212
• 11.3.3 Ukraine = 217
• 11.4 TELECOMMUNICATIONS = 223
• 11.4.1 Poland = 223
• 11.4.2 Romania = 226
• 11.4.3 Ukraine = 228
• 12 APPENDIX Ⅱ = 230
• 12.1 RESEARCH CONTACTS = 230
• 12.2 ABBREVIATIONS = 232
• 12.3 BIBLIOGRAPHY = 236