도시의 확산 억제 정책수단의 효율성과 형평성 = Efficiency and Equity of Anti-Sprawl Policies

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper analyzes the efficiency and equity impacts of spatial policies such as greenbelt and zoning (physical regulation) and congestion tolls and fuel tax (economic measures) in a spatial equilibrium model that contains transportation externalities. The study shows that economic policy instruments could outperform physical regulation in both equity and efficiency when the Pigouvian taxes collected are used in manner equally benefiting the rich and the poor. In addition, physical regulation tends to improve the welfare of the rich of the poor because the regulation could sharply increase the living cost of the poor while the higher rents mostly benefit the rich class of landowners.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 논문은 도시확산의 억제를 위해 이용되는 수단으로서 토지이용규제, 그린벨트와 같은 물리적 규제수단, 그리고 주행세, 혼잡통행료와 같은 경제적 수단이 서로 다른 소득계층의 후생수준과 형평성에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 분석한다. 종래의 정식연구는 대부분 개별 정책수단의 효율성과 형평성에 집중되었다. 분석 결과, 물리적 규제수단은 경제적 수단에 비해 대체로 효율성과 형평성 두 측면 모두 열등하게평가되는 경향이 발견된다. 특히 물리적 규제수단이 자칫 저소득층의 주거비 부담만 가중시키고 이들의 희생 위에 다른 계층의 후생이 증진되는 상황이 관찰된다. 이뿐만 아니라 역진성을 가지는 경제적 수단이 조세수입의 지출방식에 따라 오히려 저소득층이 더 혜택을 보는 프로그램이 될 수도 있다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이혁주, "행태모형과 정책연구. in: 한국행정연구-도전과 과제" 박영사 317-342, 2009

2 박지호, "조건부가치추정법(CVM)을 이용한 신도시 중앙공원의 경제적 가치평가" 대한국토·도시계획학회 39 (39): 199-214, 2004

3 이영성, "선택모형을 이용한 생태복원의 환경가치 추정에 관한 연구-청계천 복원사업을 사례로" 39 (39): 165-177, 2004

4 민병원, "복잡계로 풀어내는 국제정치" 삼성경제연구소 2005

5 김경환, "미래지향적 수도권 정책. ｢국가경쟁력 강화 및 국가균형발전을 위한 수도권의 역할과 과제｣" 67-111, 2003

6 문경일, "도시여가공간으로서 고궁의 이용가치 평가" 대한국토·도시계획학회 38 (38): 191-201, 2003

7 Hamilton, Bruce W., "Zoning and Property Taxation in a System of Local Governments" 12 : 205-211, 1975

8 Brueckner, Jang K., "Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies" 23 (23): 160-171, 2000

9 Squires, Gregory, "Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Responses" The Urban Institute Press 2002

10 Nechyba, Thomas J., "Urban Sprawl" 18 (18): 177-200, 2004

11 Brueckner, Jang K., "Urban Growth Controls with Resident Landowners" 26 : 125-143, 1996

12 McMillen, D., "Urban Aldn Value Function with Endogenous Zoning" 29 : 14-27, 1991

13 Davis, S.C., "Transportation Energy Data Book, Edition 24" Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2004

14 Cheshire, Paul, "The Welfare Economics of Land Use Planning" 52 : 242-269, 2002

15 Evans, Alan W., "The Land Market and Government Intervention. in: Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics" Elsevier 1999

16 Grieson, Ronald, "The Existence and Capitalization of Neighborhood Externalities: A Reassessment" 25 : 68-76, 1989

17 Bento, Antonio M., "The Efficiency and Distributional Impacts of Alternative Anti-sprawl Policies" 59 : 121-141, 2006

18 Oates, Wallace E., "The Effects of Property Taxes ad Local Public Spending on Perpty Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis" 77 : 957-971, 1969

19 Levine, Ned, "The Effects of Local Growth Controls on Regional Housing Production and Population Redistribution in California" 36 (36): 2047-2068, 1999

20 Quigley, John M., "The Effects of Land Use Regulation on the Price of Housing: What Do We Know? What Can We Learn?" 8 (8): 69-137, 2005

21 Frech, H.E, III, "The Effect of the California Coastal Commission on Housing Prices" 16 : 105-123, 1984

22 Speyrer, Janet F., "The Effect of Land-Use Restrictions on Market Values of Single-Family Homes" 2 : 117-130, 1989

23 Ihlandfeldt, Keith, "The Effect of Land Use Regulation on Housing and Land Prices" 61 : 420-435, 2007

24 Fischel, William A., "The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls" Johns Hopkins University Press 1985

25 Real Estate Research Corporation, "The Costs of Sprawl" U.S. Government Printing Office 1975

26 Rubinfeld, Daniel, "Suburban Employment and Zoning: A General Equilibrium Analysis" 18 : 33-44, 1978

27 Fu, Yuming, "Site Density Restrictions: Measurement and Empirical Analysis" 49 : 404-423, 2001

28 Pogodzinski, J. M., "Measuring the Effects of Municipal Zoning Regulations: A Survey" 28 (28): 597-621, 1991

29 Ewing, R., "Is Los Angeles Style Sprawl Desirable?" 63 : 107-123, 1997

30 Jan K. Brueckner, "Infrastructure Financing and Urban Development: The Economics of Impact Fees" 66 : 383-407, 1997

31 Navaro, Peter, "Growth Controls: Policy Analysis for the Second Generation" 24 : 127-152, 1991

32 Anas, Alex, "Curbing Excess Sprawl with Congestion Tolls and Urban Boundaries" 36 (36): 510-541, 2006

33 Kim, Chung-Ho, "Compensation for Regulatory Takings in the Virtual Absence of Constitutional Provision: The Case of Korea" 11 : 108-124, 2002

34 Hamilton, Bruce W., "Capitalization of Intrajurisdictional Differences in Local Tax Prices" 66 : 743-753, 1976

35 Gordon, Peter, "Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?" 63 : 95-106, 1997

36 Son, Jae-Young, "Analysis of Urban Land Shortages: The Case of Korean Cities" 43 : 362-384, 1998

37 Lee, Chang-Moo, "An Intertemporal Efficiency Test of a Greenbelt: Assessing the Economic Impacts of Seoul's" 19 : 41-52, 1999

38 Tiebout, Charles M., "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures" 64 : 416-424, 1956

39 Wheaton, William C., "A Comparative Static Analysis of Urban Spatial Structure" 9 : 223-237, 1974