RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      대중 과학에서 은유와 유비의 역할: 가모프의 우주론 3부작을 중심으로 = The Roles of Metaphors and Analogies in Popular Scientific Books: A Case of George Gamow's Cosmological Trilogy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103643252

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article examines popular scientific books from the perspective of the rhetoric of science, to look into the strategy and techniques of persuasion in science. It focuses on the rhetorical characteristics of the “Cosmological Trilogy,” authored in the 1940-50s by a Russian-American nuclear physicist George Gamow (1904-1968). Gamow’s Cosmological Trilogy, which dealt with the origin and history of the earth, the sun, and the universe, consisted mainly of expositions of physical laws and scientific hypotheses with easy-to-follow explanations of his own physical cosmology. It also used many biological, archaeological, and historical metaphors that had rarely been used in previous publications on physics-based cosmology. Analogies in the Cosmological Trilogy were also important in understanding Gamow’s strategy of persuading his cosmological theory. “Evolution,” “age,” and the “big bang” of the physical universe were described as analogical counterparts to biological evolution, biological age, and the big bang of atomic bombs, respectively. These analogies played an important role in persuading his readers that the large-scale big-bang creation and the evolutionary process of the universe can be speculated and understood by reasoning based on credible experiential sciences, although the beginning and evolution of the universe as a whole can never be directly experienced. Such analysis shows that to Gamow scientific research and popular writing were not clearly separable.
      번역하기

      This article examines popular scientific books from the perspective of the rhetoric of science, to look into the strategy and techniques of persuasion in science. It focuses on the rhetorical characteristics of the “Cosmological Trilogy,” authored...

      This article examines popular scientific books from the perspective of the rhetoric of science, to look into the strategy and techniques of persuasion in science. It focuses on the rhetorical characteristics of the “Cosmological Trilogy,” authored in the 1940-50s by a Russian-American nuclear physicist George Gamow (1904-1968). Gamow’s Cosmological Trilogy, which dealt with the origin and history of the earth, the sun, and the universe, consisted mainly of expositions of physical laws and scientific hypotheses with easy-to-follow explanations of his own physical cosmology. It also used many biological, archaeological, and historical metaphors that had rarely been used in previous publications on physics-based cosmology. Analogies in the Cosmological Trilogy were also important in understanding Gamow’s strategy of persuading his cosmological theory. “Evolution,” “age,” and the “big bang” of the physical universe were described as analogical counterparts to biological evolution, biological age, and the big bang of atomic bombs, respectively. These analogies played an important role in persuading his readers that the large-scale big-bang creation and the evolutionary process of the universe can be speculated and understood by reasoning based on credible experiential sciences, although the beginning and evolution of the universe as a whole can never be directly experienced. Such analysis shows that to Gamow scientific research and popular writing were not clearly separable.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : HANGUK KWAHAK-SA HAKHOE-JI -> The Korean Journal for the History of Science KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.42 0.42 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.47 0.697 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼