‘암시된 저자 The implied author’ 연구 = Contemplation on the ``Implied Author``

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This script contemplates the controversy over the pros and cons regarding the ``Implied Author`` in the western world, and also examines the subsequent revision and supplementation of the ``Implied Author`` by Booth. In addition, it studies the effectiveness and usefulness of the concept in understanding Korean literature, based on poems of Lee Yook-sa. Ostensibly, Chatman criticizes the ``comprehensiveness`` and the ``personification`` of the concept of the ``Implied Author``, but an in-depth look reveals that Chatman acknowledges ``the implied author`` ontologically, and that he tried to re-determine and systematize it from a reader-oriented perspective. Ansgar F. Nunning was highly critical of the ``Implied Author`` in regards to the form in which the ``Implied Author`` was applied to reviews and to the criteria in judging the reliability of the narrator. Olson refutes the assumptions of Nunning, and instead, based on the arguments of Booth, reinforced the discussion on the types of narrators related to judgments on reliability. After such controversy, Booth revised his own opinion on the ``Implied Author``, which he stressed earlier as an official, objective self, to being an intrinsic self or an avatar as an extension of the actual author. This corresponds to an indirect counter-argument at the heart of the ``Implied Author`` controversy; that is, the assertion that the ``Implied Author`` is neither a personification nor ``a distinct agent``. The controversy on the implied author is a clear example of how an implied author that`s set up from an author-centric viewpoint, is reflected when seen from a reader-oriented perspective. Yet the ``Implied Author`` presents itself ontologically during the reader`s comprehension process, and it can lead the reader to fully and truly understand the literary work by grafting the autobiographical and fictional truths together. By composing ``a collection of implied authors``, that is ``Career-Author``, we can meet various egos, embodied metonymically by the author under the circumstances and restraints of his/her time. Specifically, the implied authors of Lee Yook-sa, who was a scholar of Chinese classics and an independence activist who fought for Korea`s independence under Japanese colonial rule, are vivid examples of the power of autobiographical truth-cherishing a strong and genuine passion for national independence-beyond the imaginative prism of ``the guest``, ``steel rainbow`` and ``the seed of a humble song``.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김용직, "항일저항시 해석문제, In 한국근대문학의 현대적 해석: 이육사" 서강대출판부 1995

2 이상숙, "이육사사의 동양시학적 분석을 위한 시론-정경론, 의경론, 흥관군원론을 중심으로" 한국시학회 (12) : 113-141, 2005

3 김희곤, "이육사 평전" 푸른역사 2010

4 손병희, "이육사 전집" 깊은샘 2004

5 박현수, "이육사 시의 텍스트주의적 연구 시론" 한국근대문학회 12 (12): 237-263, 2005

6 김경복, "이육사 시의 사회주의 의식 연구" 한국시학회 (12) : 73-111, 2005

7 김종길, "이상화된 시간과 공간 -「광야」" 1986

8 오세영, "어데 닭우는 소리 들렸으랴 -이육사의「광야」, In 20세기 한국시의 표정" 새미 2000

9 최인자, "소설 화자의 맥락적 이해와 윤리적 반응 형성을 위한 소설 교육" 한국독서학회 (25) : 107-131, 2011

10 정진석, "소설 이해로서 서술자의 신빙성 평가에 대한 연구" 국어교육학회 (42) : 627-667, 2011

11 홍용희, "거경궁리(居敬窮理)의 정신과 예언자적 지성- 이육사 론 -" 한국문학연구소 (38) : 263-292, 2010

12 황현산, "「광야」에서 닭은 울었는가" 1999

13 이수정, "‘믿을 수 없는’ 일인칭 서술, In 현대소설 시점의 시학" 새문사 1996

14 Phelan, James, "The Lessons of 'Wemouth' Homodiegesis, Unreliability, Ethics, and The Remains of the Day, In Narratologies" Ohio Univ 93-96, 1999

15 Chatman, Seymour, "Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and" Cornell University Press 151-, 1978

16 Booth, Wayne C., "Resurrection of the Implied Author: Why Bother?, In NARRATIVE" Blackwell 80-85, 2008

17 Olson, Greta, "Reconsidering Unreliability, In Narrative Vol 11" Ohio State University 2003

18 Nünning, Ansgar F, "Reconceptualizing Unreliable Narration, In NARRATIVE" Blackwell 89-106, 2008

19 Phelan, James, "Living to tell about it" Cornell University Press 46-49, 2005

20 Chatman, Seymour, "In Defense of the Implied Author, In Coming to terms" Cornell Paper 1990

21 Nünning, Ansgar F., "Giessen, Unreliable, compared what? Towards a Cognitive Theory of Unrelaiable Narration, In Transcending Boundaries Narratology in Context" Gunter Narr 64-69, 1999

22 Booth, Wayne C, "General Rules, II: All Authors Should Be Objective, In The Rhetoric of Fiction" The University of Chicago Press 1983

23 Booth, Wayne C., "A Rhetoric of Irony" The University of Chicago Press 133-, 1975

24 Prince, Gerald, "A Dictionary of Narratology" University of Nebraska Press 101-, 1987