RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    하나님과 텍스트성: 조지 린드벡의 후기자유주의 종교론에 대한 비판적 평가 = God and Textuality: A Critical Study of George Lindbeck`s Postliberal Theory of Religion

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99837962

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article analyzes George Lindbeck`s postliberal theology of religion and offers the following eight challenges. First, Lindbeck`s “textualizing of reality” has a danger of transforming theology as ‘talk about God`s being’ into theology as ‘talk about God talk.’ Second, his “performative-propositional” theory fails to mediate the first cognitive-propositional and the second cultural-linguistic model of religion. Third, liberal theology cannot be reduced to what he calls an “experiential-expressive” model but described better as a “hermeneutical-political” model. Fourth, phenomenologists point out that not all religious experiences presuppose doctrinal expectations but often go beyond such expectations. Fifth, theological aestheticians warn against Lindbeck`s potential theological elitism of textuality, and offer non-linguistic possibilities of revelation. Sixth, feminists critique Lindbeck`s relative neglection of biblical patriarchism. Seventh, public theologians argue that the community of interpretation includes not only church but academy, society, even civilization as well for the sake of genuine publicness of theology. Lastly, postmodern cultural theologians argues that church cannot be understood as an isolated cultural “tribe” but has a fundamental relational identity.
    번역하기

    This article analyzes George Lindbeck`s postliberal theology of religion and offers the following eight challenges. First, Lindbeck`s “textualizing of reality” has a danger of transforming theology as ‘talk about God`s being’ into theology as ...

    This article analyzes George Lindbeck`s postliberal theology of religion and offers the following eight challenges. First, Lindbeck`s “textualizing of reality” has a danger of transforming theology as ‘talk about God`s being’ into theology as ‘talk about God talk.’ Second, his “performative-propositional” theory fails to mediate the first cognitive-propositional and the second cultural-linguistic model of religion. Third, liberal theology cannot be reduced to what he calls an “experiential-expressive” model but described better as a “hermeneutical-political” model. Fourth, phenomenologists point out that not all religious experiences presuppose doctrinal expectations but often go beyond such expectations. Fifth, theological aestheticians warn against Lindbeck`s potential theological elitism of textuality, and offer non-linguistic possibilities of revelation. Sixth, feminists critique Lindbeck`s relative neglection of biblical patriarchism. Seventh, public theologians argue that the community of interpretation includes not only church but academy, society, even civilization as well for the sake of genuine publicness of theology. Lastly, postmodern cultural theologians argues that church cannot be understood as an isolated cultural “tribe” but has a fundamental relational identity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정승태, "후기자유주의 신학의 해석학적 한계" 20 : 2001

    2 남정우, "포스트자유주의 신학과 조지 린드벡" 521 : 2002

    3 프레데릭 번햄, "포스트모던 신학" 조명문화사 1990

    4 김주한, "종교에 대한 문화- 언어적 접근 방법 연구" 533 : 2003

    5 이우찬, "조지 린드벡의 후기자유주의 신학 연구" 18 : 2005

    6 고든 카우프만, "신학 방법론" 한들 1999

    7 송재룡, "문화·언어적 종교 이해의 종교사회학적 함의" 한국인문사회과학회 31 (31): 76-96, 2007

    8 한인철, "린드벡(G. A. Lindbeck)의 종교다원주의" 31 : 1996

    9 Reynolds, Terrence, "Walking Apart, Together: Lindbeck and McFague on Theological Method" 77 : 1997

    10 Richards, Jay Wesley, "Truth and Meaning in George Lindbeck’s The Nature of Doctrine" 33 : 1997

    1 정승태, "후기자유주의 신학의 해석학적 한계" 20 : 2001

    2 남정우, "포스트자유주의 신학과 조지 린드벡" 521 : 2002

    3 프레데릭 번햄, "포스트모던 신학" 조명문화사 1990

    4 김주한, "종교에 대한 문화- 언어적 접근 방법 연구" 533 : 2003

    5 이우찬, "조지 린드벡의 후기자유주의 신학 연구" 18 : 2005

    6 고든 카우프만, "신학 방법론" 한들 1999

    7 송재룡, "문화·언어적 종교 이해의 종교사회학적 함의" 한국인문사회과학회 31 (31): 76-96, 2007

    8 한인철, "린드벡(G. A. Lindbeck)의 종교다원주의" 31 : 1996

    9 Reynolds, Terrence, "Walking Apart, Together: Lindbeck and McFague on Theological Method" 77 : 1997

    10 Richards, Jay Wesley, "Truth and Meaning in George Lindbeck’s The Nature of Doctrine" 33 : 1997

    11 Tanner, Kathryn, "Theories of Culture: A New Agenda for Theology" Fortress Press 1997

    12 J?ngel, Eberhard, "Theological Essays I I" T & & Clark 1995

    13 Lints, Richard, "The Postpositivist Choice: Tracy or Lindbeck?" 61 : 1993

    14 Lindbeck, George A., "The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age" The Westminster Press 1984

    15 Geertz, Clifford, "The Interpretation of Cultures" BasicBooks 1973

    16 Von Balthasar, "The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics, vol. 1: Seeing the Form" Ignatius Press 1982

    17 Tracy, David, "The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism" Crossroad 1991

    18 Lindbeck, George A., "Review of An Essay on Theological Method" 5 (5): 1979

    19 Thiemann, Ronald F., "Response to George Lindbeck" 43 : 1986

    20 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, "Philosophical Investigations" Prentice Hall 1958

    21 Ricoeur, Paul, "On Translation: Thinking in Action" Routledge 2006

    22 Tracy, David, "Lindbeck’s New Program For Theology: A Reflection" 49 : 1985

    23 Brown, Delwin, "Kathryn Tanner eds. Converging on Culture: Theologies in Dialogue with Cultural Analysis and Criticism" Oxford University Press 2001

    24 Sommerville, C. John, "Is Religion a Language Game?: A Real World Critique of the Cultural-Linguistic Theory" 51 : 1995

    25 Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler, "In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins" Crossroad 1983

    26 Heyer, "How Does Theology Go Public?: Rethinking the Debate Between David Tracy and George Lindbeck" 5 (5): 2004

    27 Stell, Stephen L., "Hermeneutics in Theology and the Theology of Hermeneutics: Beyond Lindbeck and Tracy" 61 : 1993

    28 Zorn, Hans, "Grammar, Doctrines, and Practice" 75 : 1995

    29 Tracy, David, "Defending the Public Character of Theology" 98 : 1981

    30 Tracy, David, "Blessed Rage for Order : The New Pluralism in Theology" The University of Chicago Press 1996

    31 Lindbeck, George A, "Barth and Textuality" 43 : 1986

    32 Kaufmann, Gordon D., "An Essay on Theological Method" Scholars Press 1975

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.37 0.37 0.34
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.29 0.23 0.606 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼